A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Irosustat Versus Megestrol Acetate in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze II, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
27870712
DOI
10.1097/igc.0000000000000862
PII: S1048-891X(24)04347-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- hormonální protinádorové látky škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- kyseliny sulfonové škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie metabolismus patologie MeSH
- megestrolacetát škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- nádory endometria farmakoterapie metabolismus patologie MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny metabolismus MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- hormonální protinádorové látky MeSH
- irosustat MeSH Prohlížeč
- kyseliny sulfonové MeSH
- megestrolacetát MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Advanced/metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Malignant endometrial tissue has high steroid sulphatase (STS) activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate STS as a therapeutic target in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: This was a phase 2, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm study of the STS inhibitor oral irosustat 40 mg/d versus oral megestrol acetate 160 mg/d in women with advanced/metastatic or recurrent estrogen receptor-positive endometrial cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients without progression or death 6 months after start of treatment. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to progression, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were treated (36 with irosustat, 35 with megestrol acetate). The study was prematurely stopped after futility analysis. Overall, 36.1% and 54.1% of patients receiving irosustat or megestrol acetate had not progressed or died at 6 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between irosustat and megestrol acetate in response and overall survival rates. Irosustat patients had a median progression-free survival of 16 weeks (90% confidence interval, 9.0-31.4) versus 40 weeks (90% confidence interval, 16.3-64.0) in megestrol acetate patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (55.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients receiving irosustat or megestrol, respectively. Most adverse events in both groups were grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: Although irosustat monotherapy did not attain a level of activity sufficient for further development in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, this study confirms the activity of hormonal treatment (megestrol acetate) for this indication.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org