Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test results in European countries: an ESCMID cross-sectional survey
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
    PubMed
          
           28093208
           
          
          
    DOI
          
           10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.014
           
          
          
      PII:  S0924-8579(17)30007-9
  
    Knihovny.cz E-resources
    
  
              
      
- Keywords
 - Antibiotic prescription, Antibiotic resistance, Antibiotic stewardship, Antibiotic susceptibility testing, Questionnaire, Selective reporting,
 - MeSH
 - Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology therapeutic use MeSH
 - Guideline Adherence MeSH
 - Humans MeSH
 - Microbial Sensitivity Tests methods MeSH
 - Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
 - Drug Utilization standards MeSH
 - Check Tag
 - Humans MeSH
 - Publication type
 - Journal Article MeSH
 - Geographicals
 - Europe MeSH
 - Israel MeSH
 - Names of Substances
 - Anti-Bacterial Agents MeSH
 
Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results is one possible laboratory-based antibiotic stewardship intervention. The primary aim of this study was to identify where and how selective reporting of AST results is implemented in Europe both in inpatient and in outpatient settings. An ESCMID cross-sectional, self-administered, internet-based survey was conducted among all EUCIC (European Committee on Infection Control) or EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) national representatives in Europe and Israel. Of 38 countries, 36 chose to participate in the survey. Selective reporting of AST results was implemented in 11/36 countries (31%), was partially implemented in 4/36 (11%) and was limited to local initiatives or was not adopted in 21/36 (58%). It was endorsed as standard of care by health authorities in only three countries. The organisation of selective reporting was everywhere discretionally managed by each laboratory, with a pronounced intra- and inter-country variability. The most frequent application was in uncomplicated community-acquired infections, particularly urinary tract and skin and soft-tissue infections. The list of reported antibiotics ranged from a few first-line options, to longer reports where only last-resort antibiotics were hidden. Several barriers to implementation were reported, mainly lack of guidelines, poor system support, insufficient resources, and lack of professionals' capability. In conclusion, selective reporting of AST results is poorly implemented in Europe and is applied with a huge heterogeneity of practices. Development of an international framework, based on existing initiatives and identified barriers, could favour its dissemination as one important element of antibiotic stewardship programmes.
Central Hospital Department of Clinical Microbiology Växjö Sweden
Department of Infectious Diseases Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
References provided by Crossref.org