OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify factors contributing to the development of non-union after fixation of diaphyseal humeral fractures using Hackethal's intramedullary nailing technique. METHODS: In the time period from 2001 to 2010 156 patients with diaphyseal humeral fractures were treated surgically using Hackethal's technique. Six of them (3.8%) developed non-union. This group included three women and two men aged 63-69 years and one woman aged 37 years. The following parameters of the patients were recorded: age, gender, comorbidities, substance abuse, mechanism of injury, fracture type and location according to the AO/ASIF classification, and the operative technique. RESULTS: A non-union developed in six patients treated with Hackethal´s method (3.8%). Five of six non-unions (83%) were observed in patients in their sixties. In the subgroup of sexagenarians, non-union developed in 20.8% of surgically treated patients, as compared to 3.8 % in entire group. In the union group, fractures have been caused by high energy trauma in 52% of patients. In patients who developed non-union, high energy trauma caused 67% of fractures. With correct surgical technique the development of a non-union was observed in 0.7% of patients, with incorrect technique in 35.7% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures with Hackethal's intramedullary elastic bundle nailing resulted in an overall high union rate. Factors contributing to the development of non-union were extension of this method to AO type B3 and C fractures and technical imperfection during implantation. Level of Evidence III, Prospective, Case-Control Study.

Clinic of Traumatology Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem Czech Republic

Clinic of Traumatology Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem Czech Republic ; > 3rd Medical Faculty Charles University Prague Czech Republic

University Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital Dresden Germany

See more in PubMed

Hackethal KH. Die Bündel-Nagelung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1961.

Brug E, Westphal T, Schafers G. Differenzierte Behandlung der Humerus diaphys enfrakturen. Unfallchirurg. 1994;97(12):633–638. PubMed

Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T. Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2007;31(3):391–395. PubMed PMC

Demirel M, Turhan E, Dereboy F, Ozturk A. Interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures A retrospective study of 114 patients. Indian J Med Sci. 2005;59(10):436–442. PubMed

Rommens PM, Kuechle R, Bord T, Lewens T, Engelmann R, Blum J. Humeral nailing revisited. Injury. 2008;39(12):1319–1328. PubMed

Strohm PC, Reising K, Hammer T, Sudkamp NP, Jaeger M, Schmal H. Humerus shaft fractures - where are we today. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(3):185–189. PubMed

mejkal K, Dědek T, Lochman P, Zahradníček J, Žvák I, Trlica J. Operační léčba zlomenin diafýzy humeru. Rozhl Chir. 2008;87(11):580–584. PubMed

Neumann HS, Holmenschlager F, Winckler S, Brug E. Bundle nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995;61(1):159–161. PubMed

Obruba P, Kopp L, Edelmann K. Léčba zlomenin diafýzy humeru nitrodřeňovou fixací svazkem hřebů podle Hackethala. Acta Chir Orthop Traum Čech. 2012;79(4):341–346. PubMed

Peter RE, Hoffmeyer P, Henley MB. Treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures with Hackethal stacked nailing: a report of 33 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(1):14–17. PubMed

Ponziani L, Pascarella R, Barchetti M, Palumbi P, Trono M, Magnani M. Fractures of the humerus treated by elastic nailing. Chir Organi Mov. 2001;86(1):15–19. PubMed

páta L, Kleisl R, Bartoš P. Hackethalova osteosyntéza kosti pažní Enderovými pruty. Úraz Chir. 1997;5(3):14–17.

Zatti G, Teli M, Ferrario A, Cherubino P. Treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures with intramedullary elastic nails. J Trauma. 1998;45(6):1046–1050. PubMed

Frank M, Kanta M, Dědek T. Paréza radiálního nervu způsobená pakloubem diafýzy humeru - kazuistika. Rozhl Chir. 2010;89(9):440–442. PubMed

Allende C, Paz A, Altube G, Boccolini H, Malvarez A, Allende B. Revision with plates of humeral nonunions secondary to failed intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop. 2014;38(4):899–903. PubMed PMC

Broadbent MR, Will E, McQueen MM. Prediction of outcome after humeral diaphyseal fracture. Injury. 2010;41(6):572–577. PubMed

Foulk DA, Szabo RM. Diaphyseal humerus fractures: natural history and occurrence of nonunion. Orthopedics. 1995;18(4):333–335. PubMed

Frič V, Pazdírek P, Bartoníček J. Nepředvrtané zajištěné hřebování zlomenin humeru- základní hodnocení souboru. Acta Chir Orthop Traum Čech. 2001;68:345–356. PubMed

Garnavos C, Lasanianos N, Kanakaris NK, Arnaoutoglou C, Papathanasopoulou V, Xenakis T. A new modular nail for the diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Injury. 2009;40(6):604–610. PubMed

Kumar MN, Ravindranath VP, Ravishankar M. Outcome of locking compression plates in humeral shaft nonunions. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(2):150–155. PubMed PMC

Mallick E, Hazarika S, Assad S, Scott M. The Fixion nailing system for stabilising diaphyseal fractures of the humerus a two-year clinical experience. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008;74(3):308–316. PubMed

Mauch J, Renner N, Rikli D. Marknagelosteosynthese von Humerusschaftfrakturen - erste Erfahrungen mit dem unaufgebohrten Humerusnagel (UHN) Swiss Surg. 2000;6(6):299–303. PubMed

Remiger AR, Miclau T, Lindsey RW, Blatter G. Segmental avascularity of the humeral diaphysis after reamed intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(4):308–311. PubMed

Decomas A, Kaye J. Risk factors associated with failure of treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures after functional bracing. J La State Med Soc. 2010;162(1):33–35. PubMed

Hernigou J, Schuind F. Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in diaphyseal fracture healing. Int Orthop. 2013;37(5):883–887. PubMed PMC