The sixteenth century could be understand as a period of renaissance of interest in nature and as a period of development of natural history as a discipline. The spreading of the printing press was connected to the preparation of new editions of Classical texts and to the act of correcting and commenting on these texts. This forced scholars to confront texts with living nature and to subject it to more careful investigation. The discovery of America uncovered new horizons and brought new natural products, which were exotic and unknown to Classical tradition. The aim of this study is to compare strategies and categories, which were used in describing plants of the Old and the New World. Attention will be paid to the first reactions to the new flora, to the methods of naming and describing plants, to the ways of gaining knowledge about plants from local sources or by means of one's own observation. The confrontation with novelty puts naturalists in the Old World and in the New World in a similar situation. It reveals the limits of traditional knowledge based on Classical authorities. A closer investigation, however, brings to light not only the sometimes unexpected similarities, but also the differences which were due to the radical otherness of American plants.

Department of Philosophy and History of Science Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 44 Prague 2 Czech Republic

Department of Philosophy Faculty of Philosophy and Arts University of West Bohemia Univerzitní 8 301 00 Pilsen Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Early Sci Med. 2014;19(4):287-316 PubMed

Arch Toxicol. 1986 Apr;58(4):207-13 PubMed

Early Sci Med. 2016 Aug;21(2-3):214-231 PubMed

J R Soc Med. 1985 Feb;78(2):149-57 PubMed

Ann Sci. 1976 Nov;33(6):519-42 PubMed

Am Hist Rev. 1979 Feb;84(1):72-85 PubMed

Livre Estampe. 1966;45:51-5 PubMed

Pharm Hist. 1993;35(3):99-127 PubMed