OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of ultrasound, sialography, and sialendoscopy for examining benign salivary gland obstructions. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with symptoms of obstruction of the major salivary gland duct system presenting at the ENT Clinic University Hospital, Ostrava, from June 2010 to December 2013 were included. All patients (n=76) underwent ultrasound, sialography, and sialoendoscopy. The signs of sialolithiasis, ductal stenosis, or normal findings were recorded after the examinations. Statistical analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of all the methods was performed, as well as a comparison of the accuracy of each method for different kinds of pathology (sialolithiasis or stenosis). RESULTS: The sensitivity of ultrasound, sialography, and sialoendoscopy for sialolithiasis findings were 71.9%, 86.7 %, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of sialography and sialoendoscopy for stenosis of the duct was 69.0%, and 100%, respectively. The study showed impossibility of ultrasonic diagnostics of ductal stenosis. The sensitivity of sialoendoscopy for both pathologies was significantly higher than that from ultrasound or sialography (p<0.05). The specificity of sialoendoscopy was significantly higher than that from by ultrasound or sialography (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Sialoendoscopy was the most accurate method for examination ductal pathology, with significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than by ultrasound or sialography.

Department of Otolaryngology University Hospital Ostrava 17 listopadu 1790 708 52 Ostrava Czech Republic Tel 00420597375801

Department of Otolaryngology University Hospital Ostrava Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Brown JE. Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Benign Salivary Gland Obstruction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2002;25:345–351. PubMed

Koch M,, Zenk J,, Iro H. Diagnostic and interventional sialoscopy in obstructive disease of the salivary glands. HNO. 2008;56:139–144. PubMed

Koch M,, Zenk J,, Iro H. Algorithms for treatment of salivary gland obstructions. OtolaryngolClin North Am. 2004;9:1173–11792. PubMed

McGurk M,, Makdissi J,, Brown JE. Intra-oral removal of stones from the hilum of the submandibular gland: report of technique and morbidity. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2004;33:683–686. PubMed

Kress E,, Schulz HG,, Neumann T. Diagnosis of diseases of the large salivary glands of the head by ultrasound, sialography and CT-sialography. A comparison of methods.HNO. 1993;41:345–351. PubMed

Stárek I. Choroby slinných žláz, Grada Publishing Praha. 2000 IBSN 8071699667.

Zenk J, Hosemann WG, Iro H. Diameters of the main excretory ducts of the adult human submandibular and parotid gland: a histologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:576–580. PubMed

Koch M, Zenk J, Bozzato A. et al. Sialoscopy in case of unclear

swelling of major salivary glands. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133:863–868. PubMed

Zenk J, Iro H. Die Sialolithiasis und deren Behandlung. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 2001;80:115–136. (suppl)

Marchal F, Becker M, Dulguerov P. et al. Specificity of parotid sialendoscopy. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:264–271. PubMed

Nahlieli O, Baruchin AM. Endoscopic technique for the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive salivary gland diseases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1394–1401. PubMed

Nahlieli O, Baruchin AM. Long-term experience with endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of salivary gland inflammatory diseases. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:988–993. PubMed

Iro H, Uttenweiler V, Zenk J. Kopf-Hals-Sonografie. Berlin Heidelberg; Springer: 2000.

Geisthoff UV., Lehnert B, Verse T. Ultrasound-guided mechanical intraductal stone fragmentation and removal for sialolithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:690–694. PubMed

Koch M, Iro H, Zenk J. Sialendoscopy-based diagnosis and classification of parotid duct stenoses. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1696–1703. PubMed

Bohndorf K., Lönnecken I, Zanella FL. et al. Der Wert von Sonographie und Sialographie in der Diagnostik von Speicheldrüsenerkrankungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1987;147:288–293. PubMed