Comparison of passive sampling and biota for monitoring of tonalide in aquatic environment

. 2017 Oct ; 24 (28) : 22251-22257. [epub] 20170810

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28799007

Grantová podpora
CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024 CENAKVA
the results of the Project LO1205 were obtained with a financial support from the MEYS of the CR under the NPU I program CENAKVA II
012/2016/Z Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia

Odkazy

PubMed 28799007
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9850-3
PII: 10.1007/s11356-017-9850-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Synthetic musk compounds are extensively used in personal care and cosmetic products all over the world. Afterwards, they are discharged into the environment mainly because they are not completely removed in wastewater treatment plants. The aim of this study was to investigate if a passive sampler is applicable for the monitoring of tonalide, a polycyclic musk compound, in the aquatic environment and to compare the levels of tonalide in pesticide-polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) and biota. For this purpose, four sampling localities on the three biggest rivers in the Czech Republic were selected. Tonalide was determined in POCIS at all sampling sites in the concentration ranging from 9 ng/POCIS (Labe River, Hradec Králové) to 25 ng/POCIS (Morava River, Blatec). The locality with the most frequent occurrence of tonalide in biota samples was the Morava River which well corresponded with the highest tonalide concentration in POCIS among sampling sites. The highest number of positive tonalide detections among all studied biota samples was found in fish plasma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence that tonalide bioaccumulates in fish blood. Tonalide levels were below the limit of quantification in benthos samples at all sampling sites.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Mar;20(3):1344-51 PubMed

Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Oct;53(3):390-6 PubMed

J Hazard Mater. 2015 Jan 23;282:34-40 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2005 Aug;60(6):817-23 PubMed

Environ Res. 2015 Nov;143(Pt B):29-45 PubMed

Water Res. 2011 Jan;45(3):1403-13 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 1;511:214-22 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jun 1;41(11):3815-20 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2005 Nov;61(5):610-22 PubMed

Mar Pollut Bull. 2008;57(6-12):373-80 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2012 Feb 1;416:253-60 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Aug;32(8):1718-26 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 Nov;29(11):2461-9 PubMed

Toxicol Lett. 1999 Dec 20;111(1-2):57-79 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2011 Mar;82(11):1518-32 PubMed

J Chromatogr A. 2005 Oct 28;1092(2):170-81 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Jan 15;41(2):424-30 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 Jul;23 (7):1640-8 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 May;28(5):1084-95 PubMed

J Environ Qual. 2010 Jul-Aug;39(4):1161-72 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2008 Aug;72 (10 ):1510-6 PubMed

Water Res. 2015 Apr 1;72:145-53 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Jan;20(1):311-22 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2007 Aug;68(11):2011-20 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Jan;111:248-55 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2010 Jan;158(1):215-22 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jul 15;487:801-12 PubMed

Toxicol Lett. 1999 Dec 20;111(1-2):37-56 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...