Restrictions for reimbursement of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral drugs for HCV infection in Europe
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
RP-DG-0610-10055
Department of Health - United Kingdom
PubMed
28986139
DOI
10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30284-4
PII: S2468-1253(17)30284-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antivirové látky ekonomika terapeutické užití MeSH
- chronická hepatitida C komplikace farmakoterapie ekonomika MeSH
- Evropská unie MeSH
- HIV infekce komplikace MeSH
- koinfekce MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náklady na léky * MeSH
- úhrada zdravotního pojištění * MeSH
- zdravotní politika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Švýcarsko MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antivirové látky MeSH
All-oral direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus, which have response rates of 95% or more, represent a major clinical advance. However, the high list price of DAAs has led many governments to restrict their reimbursement. We reviewed the availability of, and national criteria for, interferon-free DAA reimbursement among countries in the European Union and European Economic Area, and Switzerland. Reimbursement documentation was reviewed between Nov 18, 2016, and Aug 1, 2017. Primary outcomes were fibrosis stage, drug or alcohol use, prescriber type, and HIV co-infection restrictions. Among the 35 European countries and jurisdictions included, the most commonly reimbursed DAA was ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with dasabuvir, and with or without ribavirin (33 [94%] countries and jurisdictions). 16 (46%) countries and jurisdictions required patients to have fibrosis at stage F2 or higher, 29 (83%) had no listed restrictions based on drug or alcohol use, 33 (94%) required a specialist prescriber, and 34 (97%) had no additional restrictions for people co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. These findings have implications for meeting WHO targets, with evidence of some countries not following the 2016 hepatitis C virus treatment guidelines by the European Association for the Study of Liver.
Abdominal Center Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki University Helsinki Finland
Arud Centres for Addiction Medicine Zürich Switzerland
Clinic for Infectious Diseases and Febrile Illnesses University Medical Centre Ljubljana Slovenia
Department of Infection and Immunity Luxembourg Institute of Health Luxembourg City Luxembourg
Department of Infectious Diseases Academic Medical Center Amsterdam Netherlands
Department of Infectious Diseases Akershus University Hospital University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Medical University of Bialystok Bialystok Poland
Department of Infectious Diseases Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Internal Medicine Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece
Department of Internal Medicine University of Tartu Estonia
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fundeni Clinical Institute Bucharest Romania
Gastroenterology Department Mater Dei Hospital Msida Malta
Health Protection Scotland Glasgow UK
Hepatology Center St István and St László Hospital Budapest Hungary
Hopital Henri Mondor Universite Paris Est Créteil France
Ludwig Maximilians University Munich Germany
Ministry of Health Luxembourg City Luxembourg
Office of Public Health Vaduz Liechtenstein
Queen Mary University of London London UK
Social Medicine University of Bristol Bristol UK
The Kirby Institute UNSW Sydney NSW Australia
University Hospital for Infectious Diseases University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
HCV Elimination in Central Europe with Particular Emphasis on Microelimination in Prisons
How close are we to hepatitis C virus elimination in Central Europe?