Mola hydatidosa completa s přechodem do nemetastázující perzistující trofoblastické nemociKazuistika, poučení a úvaha nad pravidly dispenzarizace a rozhodovacích mechanismů Forenzní zodpovědnost a postavení spádového gynekologa
[Complete molar pregancy with development of non-metastatic persistent trophoblastic diseaseA case report, reflection of rules of care and decision-making processes Forensic responsibility and the position of doctor in the general gynecologic and obstetric outpatient practice]
Language Czech Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Case Reports, Journal Article, Review
PubMed
29020788
PII: 61959
- Keywords
- GTN, Trophoblastic Disease Center, chemotherapy, complete hydatiform mole, general gynecologic and obstetric outpatient practice, genetics, molar pregnancy, outpatient follow-up forensic responsibility., persistent gestational trophoblastic disease/neoplasia, trofoblast,
- MeSH
- Gestational Trophoblastic Disease * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Hydatidiform Mole * MeSH
- Uterine Neoplasms * MeSH
- Outpatients MeSH
- Decision Making * MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
- Review MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To define the forensic responsibility and the position of doctor in the general gynecologic and obstetric outpatient practice in care of the complete molar pregancy. DESIGN: Case report and review article. SETTING: General gynecologic and obstetric outpatient practice Velké Meziříčí; Sanatorium REPROMEDA, Centre of reproductive medicine and preimplantation genetics, Brno; Histopatology department of Hospital Jihlava. CASE REPORT: The changing clinical presentation of complete molar pregnancy with development of non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic disease: management. Subsequent early pregnancies outcome following complete hydatiform molar pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Discussed are the forensic responsibility and the position of doctor in the general gynecologic and obstetric outpatient practice with the collaboration of Trophoblastic Disease Center based on the detail expert knowledges: rules of care and decision-making processes and potential controversies, the pitfalls of the histopathologic diagnosis, the genetics of complete hydatiform mole: new lights on a disease, outpatient follow-up and possibility and the risks of the subsequent pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The conclusion is trying to guide quickly a doctor in the general gynecologic and obstetric outpatient practice in the decision-making processes through the crossings of any situation of the complete molar pregnancy and outpatient follow-up, alternatively with the collaboration of Trophoblastic Disease Center.