Variability in Sexual Pheromones Questions their Role in Bumblebee Pre-Mating Recognition System
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
244090FP7/2007-2013
European community's seventh framework programme, STEP project (Status and Trends of European Pollinators
PubMed
29209934
DOI
10.1007/s10886-017-0910-4
PII: 10.1007/s10886-017-0910-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cephalic glands, Courtship behavior, Pheromones, Pollinator, Social insect,
- MeSH
- analýza hlavních komponent MeSH
- exokrinní žlázy chemie metabolismus MeSH
- plynová chromatografie s hmotnostně spektrometrickou detekcí MeSH
- sexuální lákadla analýza chemie MeSH
- včely chemie metabolismus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- sexuální lákadla MeSH
Sex-specific chemical secretions have been widely used as diagnostic characters in chemotaxonomy. The taxonomically confused group of bumblebees has reaped the benefit of this approach through the analyses of cephalic labial gland secretions (CLGS). Most of currently available CLGS descriptions concern species from the West-Palearctic region but few from the New World. Here, the CLGS of four East-Palearctic species Bombus deuteronymus, B. filchnerae, B. humilis, and B. exil (subgenus Thoracobombus) are analysed. Our results show high levels of variability in the major compounds in B. exil. In contrast, we describe a low differentiation in CLGS compounds between B. filchnerae and its phylogenetically closely related taxon B. muscorum. Moreover, the chemical profiles of B. filchnerae and B. muscorum are characterized by low concentrations of the C16 component, which is found in higher concentrations in the other Thoracobombus species. This raises the possibility that courtship behavior as well as environmental constraints could affect the role of the bumblebee males' CLGS.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013 Aug;70(16):3029-39 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 2009 Jun;35(6):698-705 PubMed
J Insect Physiol. 2001 Feb 1;47(2):115-130 PubMed
C R Biol. 2010 May;333(5):429-37 PubMed
Lipids. 2008 May;43(5):441-50 PubMed
J Sep Sci. 2013 Oct;36(19):3206-9 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 06;8(6):e65642 PubMed
Insect Sci. 2018 Feb;25(1):75-86 PubMed
Front Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec 31;1:5 PubMed
Chem Biodivers. 2007 Jul;4(7):1466-71 PubMed
Z Naturforsch C. 2004 Sep-Oct;59(9-10):701-7 PubMed
Chembiochem. 2013 Feb 11;14(3):361-71 PubMed
J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 11;35(10 ):4157-67 PubMed
Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):856-7 PubMed
Eur J Neurosci. 1999 Nov;11(11):3970-82 PubMed
Chem Biodivers. 2015 Oct;12(10):1535-46 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2389-95 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 1984 Aug;10(8):1157-68 PubMed
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 04;10 (9):e0137413 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug;108(4):1106-21 PubMed
Annu Rev Entomol. 2014;59:299-319 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 2008 Oct;34(10):1268-74 PubMed
Rev Mal Respir. 2008 Feb;25(2):155-63 PubMed
J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 6;33(6):2443-56 PubMed
Zootaxa. 2014 Jul 08;3830:1-89 PubMed