Dispersal limitation, niche-based processes as well as historical legacies shape microbial biodiversity, but their respective influences remain unknown for many groups of microbes. We analysed metacommunity structure and functional trait variation in 148 communities of desmids, freshwater green algae, distributed throughout Europe. We delineated biogeographic modules for both taxa and sites using bipartite network analysis given that the taxa of a module co-occurred more often than expected by chance in sites of the same module. The network analysis distinguished two main acidic and neutral habitats, reflecting environmental filtering, and within each habitat separated species pools with distinct geographic locations, representing a plausible influence of historical biogeography. The geographic differentiation was consistent with a hypothesis of glacial refugia on Atlantic coast. Distance decay in community composition in addition to environmental influence further suggested a role of dispersal limitation. Next, we quantified the variation in cell volume and surface-to-volume of taxa within and among communities, to examine morphological and physiological adaptations of desmids in varying environments. Communities from continental climate contained larger desmids. Conversely, we found a functional convergence of smaller, fast-growing, desmids in oceanic regions. Overall, our findings suggest that niche-based processes, dispersal limitation, and historical legacy together drive the distribution and structure of desmid communities. Combining trait- and network-based analyses can resolve long-lasting questions in microbial ecology and biogeography, and could be successfully used in macrobial ecology too.

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Benátská 2 Prague 128 01 Czech Republic

Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France

UMR 5175 Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive Université de Montpellier Université Paul Valéry EPHE 1919 route de Mende 34293 Montpellier France

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 May 14;10(7):497-506 PubMed

Ecology. 2012 Oct;93(10):2263-73 PubMed

Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1015 PubMed

Am J Bot. 2008 Jun;95(6):643-54 PubMed

ISME J. 2012 Sep;6(9):1653-64 PubMed

Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1061-3 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2014 Feb;23(4):954-64 PubMed

Front Microbiol. 2014 Sep 26;5:497 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 23;111(38):13690-6 PubMed

Science. 2008 Oct 24;322(5901):580-2 PubMed

Front Microbiol. 2014 Nov 12;5:614 PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 May;5(5):384-92 PubMed

Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2425-32 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):244-52 PubMed

BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Aug 22;7:144 PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Feb;4(2):102-12 PubMed

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52661 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2007 Feb;10(2):135-45 PubMed

Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 22;278(1725):3644-53 PubMed

J Stat Mech. 2005 Feb 1;2005(P02001):nihpa35573 PubMed

Am Nat. 2015 Oct;186(4):460-9 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Sep;21(9):501-7 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2010 Sep;13(9):1085-93 PubMed

Ecology. 2006 Jun;87(6):1465-71 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 May;21(5):261-8 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 7;278(1716):2355-61 PubMed

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013 Sep;77(3):342-56 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2015 Dec;18(12):1406-19 PubMed

ISME J. 2013 Mar;7(3):652-9 PubMed

Science. 2009 Sep 18;325(5947):1539-41 PubMed

Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):281-291 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Nov;27(11):600-7 PubMed

Front Microbiol. 2014 May 27;5:251 PubMed

Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):919-22 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):178-85 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2005 Mar;14(3):793-803 PubMed

ISME J. 2013 Jul;7(7):1310-21 PubMed

J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;61(5):509-19 PubMed