BACKGROUND: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-second edition (MABC-2) Age Band 1 is widely used to identify preschoolers with motor difficulties. Despite unsatisfactory construct validity of the original three-factor model, MABC-2 (manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance), previous research has not considered possible age and gender differences throughout the entire preschool period. AIM: The aim of this study was to verify the construct validity of the MABC-2 Age Band 1 in a population of Czech preschoolers with respect to age and gender. METHODS: Using data from 510 Czech preschoolers (3-6 years; 4.9 ± 1.1 years), confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used for each age category and gender. RESULTS: The goodness-of-fit indices of CFA supported the original three-factor model of the MABC-2 only in 3- and 4-year-old children, and in boys (3-6 years). Low factor loadings and ceiling effects of several test items (Drawing Trail, Walking Heels Raised, and Jumping on Mats) seem to be a probable cause of weak fit indices in 5- and 6-year-old children and in girls (3-6 years). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the MABC-2 can be a valid tool for assessing motor development and identifying motor difficulties among 3- to 4-year olds, and generally fits better for preschool boys in the Czech Republic. However, in 5- to 6-year olds, ceiling effects and a low power of discrimination was found for the Drawing Trail, Walking Heels Raised, and Jumping on Mats tests. Therefore, the three-factor model is not appropriate for all preschoolers, and separate norms should be established for each age and gender.

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Gabbard CP. Lifelong Motor Development: Pearson New International Edition. 6th ed Philadelphia: Pearson Higher Education; (2013).

Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway JD. Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. 7th ed New York: McGraw-Hill; (2011).

Cools W, De Martelaer K, Samaey C, Andries C. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: a review of seven movement skill assessment tools. J Sports Sci Med (2009) 8(2):154–68. PubMed PMC

Stodden D, Goodway J, Langendorfer S, Roberton M, Rudisill M, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest (2008) 60(2):290–306.10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582 DOI

Clark JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. Motor Dev Res Rev. Reston, VA: NASPE; (2002) 2:163–90.

Rose B, Larkin D, Berger BG. The importance of motor coordination for children’s motivational orientations in sport 1. Adapt Phys Activ Q (1998) 15(4):316–27.10.1123/apaq.15.4.316 DOI

Hands BP. How can we best measure fundamental movement skills? Health Sciences Conference Papers Launceston Tas (2002). 5 p.

Psotta R, Brom O. Factorial structure of the movement assessment battery for children test-second edition in preschool children. Percept Mot Skills (2016) 123(3):702–16.10.1177/0031512516666072 PubMed DOI

Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2): Examiner’s Manual. London: Pearson Assessment; (2007).

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; (2013).

Burton AW, Miller DE. Movement Skill Assessment. Champaign: Human Kinetics; (1998).

Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Williamson A, Paton JY, et al. Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2005) 37(4):684–8.10.1249/01.MSS.0000159138.48107.7D PubMed DOI

Kokštejn J, Musálek M, Tufano JJ. Are sex differences in fundamental motor skills uniform throughout the entire preschool period? PLoS One (2017) 12(4):e0176556.10.1371/journal.pone.0176556 PubMed DOI PMC

Livesey D, Coleman R, Piek J. Performance on the movement assessment battery for children by Australian 3- to 5-year-old children. Child Care Health Dev (2007) 33(6):713–9.10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00733.x PubMed DOI

Ziviani J, Poulsen A, Hansen C. Movement skills proficiency and physical activity: a case for engaging and coaching for health (EACH)–child. Aus Occup Ther J (2009) 56(4):259–65.10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00758.x PubMed DOI

Wagner MO, Kastner J, Petermann F, Bös K. Factorial validity of the movement assessment battery for children-2 (age band 2). Res Dev Disabil (2011) 32(2):674–80.10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.016 PubMed DOI

Brown T, Lalor A. The movement assessment battery for children—second edition (MABC-2): a review and critique. Phys Occup Ther Ped (2009) 29(1):86–103.10.1080/01942630802574908 PubMed DOI

Schulz J, Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Structural validity of the movement ABC-2 test: factor structure comparisons across three age groups. Res Dev Disabil (2011) 32(4):1361–9.10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.032 PubMed DOI

Hua J, Gu G, Meng W, Wu Z. Age band 1 of the movement assessment battery for children-second edition: exploring its usefulness in mainland China. Res Dev Disabil (2013) 34(2):801–8.10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.012 PubMed DOI

Ellinoudis T, Evaggelinou C, Kourtessis T, Konstantinidou Z, Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the movement assessment battery for children-second edition. Res Dev Disabil (2011) 32(3):1046–51.10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.035 PubMed DOI

Gabbard CP. Lifelong Motor Development. 7th ed Philadelphia: Pearson Higher Education; (2011).

Kambas A, Venetsanou F, Giannakidou D, Fatouros IG, Avloniti A, Chatzinikolaou A, et al. The motor-proficiency-test for children between 4 and 6 years of age (MOT 4–6): an investigation of its suitability in Greece. Res Dev Disabil (2012) 33(5):1626–32.10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.002 PubMed DOI

Van Waelvelde H, Peersman W, Lenoir M, Smits Engelsman B, Henderson S. The movement assessment battery for children: similarities and differences between 4- and 5-year-old children from Flanders and the United States. Pediatr Phys Ther (2008) 20(1):30–8.10.1097/PEP.0b013e31815ee2b2 PubMed DOI

Gidley Larson JC, Mostofsky SH, Goldberg MC, Cutting LE, Denckla MB, Mahone EM. Effects of gender and age on motor exam in typically developing children. Dev Neurol (2007) 32(1):543–62.10.1080/87565640701361013 PubMed DOI PMC

Hardy L, King L, Farrell L, Macniven R, Howlett S. Fundamental movement skills among Australian preschool children. J Sci Med Sport (2009) 13(5):503–8.10.1016/j.jsams.2009.05.010 PubMed DOI

Foulkes J, Knowles Z, Fairclough S, Stratton G, O’dwyer M, Ridgers N, et al. Fundamental movement skills of preschool children in northwest England. Percept Mot Skills (2015) 121:260–83.10.2466/10.25.PMS.121c14x0 PubMed DOI

Psotta R. MABC-2: Test motoriky pro děti (1. českévydání) [The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Test (1st Czech edition)]. Praha, Czech Republic: Hogrefe-Testcentrum; (2014).

Ferron JM, Hess MR. Estimation in SEM: a concrete example. J Behav Exp x (2007) 32(1):110–20.10.3102/1076998606298025 DOI

Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén&Muthén; (2010).

McDonald RP. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; (1999).

Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle JJ. Contemporary Psychometrics. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; (2005).

McDonald RP, Marsh HW. Choosing a multivarite model: noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychol Bull (1990) 107(2):247–55.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247 DOI

Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparametrized model misspecification. Psychol Methods (1998) 3(4):424–53.10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424 DOI

Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation. 3rd ed New York: Guildford Press; (2011).

Findley DF. Counter examples to parsimony and BIC. Ann Inst StatMath (1991) 43:505–14.10.1007/BF00053369 DOI

Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol (1995) 25:111–63.10.2307/271063 DOI

Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley Interscience; (1989).

Hausman JA. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46(6):1251–71.10.2307/1913827 DOI

Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International; (1993).

Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press; (2006).

Do Girls Have an Advantage Compared to Boys When Their Motor Skills Are Tested Using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd Edition?