The ultrasonography evaluation of talar dysplasia as a potential prognostic factor for predicting the course and outcomes of clubfoot deformity treatment using Ponseti technique
Language English Country Turkey Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
29452895
PubMed Central
PMC6136334
DOI
10.1016/j.aott.2017.11.007
PII: S1017-995X(16)30057-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Achilles tendon, Clubfoot, Ponseti method, Talar dysplasia, Tarsal bone, Ultrasonography,
- MeSH
- Achilles Tendon surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Clubfoot * diagnosis pathology physiopathology surgery MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Casts, Surgical MeSH
- Talus * abnormalities diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Tenotomy * methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Ultrasonography methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the role of sonographic evaluation of Talar dysplasia in predicting the outcome of standard Ponseti method in the treatment of clubfoot deformity. METHODS: A total 23 children (15 boys and 8 girls; mean age: 18.2 ± 5.4 days (8-32)) who underwent Ponseti treatment were included in the study. Before the treatment, maximal talus length of affected and non-affected feet were measured by US and relative talar dysplasia ratio (RTDR) was calculated. The patients were categorized 2 groups according to RTDR: group A - mild and group B - severe deformity. Pirani score was used for clinical evaluation. The groups were compared in terms of number of the applied casts, need of percutaneous tenotomy of Achilles tendon (AchT) and frequency of deformity recurrence. RESULTS: Pirani score was 4.46 for population (4.33 for group A; 4.54 for group B). Number of casts significantly differed between groups (p < 0.001) and positive correlation was found (r = 0.851, p < 0.001). AchT was performed in 56% cases for group A and in 86% cases for group B; no statistically significant difference was obtained (p = 0.162). Recurrence occurred in 2 patients belonging to group B without significant difference compared to group A (p = 0.502). CONCLUSION: Talar dysplasia assessment appeared as a promising prognostic factor for predicting the outcome of the Ponseti technique in treatment of clubfoot deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study.
See more in PubMed
Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and the cause of congenital club foot. Talipes equinovarus, talipes calcaneo-valgus and metatarsus varus. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1964;46:445–463. PubMed
Ponseti I.V. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1992;74(3):448–454. PubMed
Colburn M., Williams M. Evaluation of the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by using the Ponseti method. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(5):259–267. PubMed
Herzenberg J.E., Radler C., Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(4):517–521. PubMed
Lehman W.B., Mohaideen A., Madan S. A method for the early evaluation of the Ponseti (Iowa) technique for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003;12(2):133–140. PubMed
Diméglio A., Bensahel H., Souchet P., Mazeau P., Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(2):129–136. PubMed
Pirani S., Outerbridge H., Moran M.B.S. POSNA; Miami: 1995. A Method of Evaluating Virgin Clubfoot with Substantial Interobserver Reliability.
Dyer P.J., Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1082–1084. PubMed
Chu A., Labar A.S., Sala D.A., van Bosse H.J., Lehman W.B. Clubfoot classification: correlation with Ponseti cast treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(7):695–699. PubMed
Howard C.B., Benson M.K. The ossific nuclei and the cartilage anlage of the talus and calcaneum. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1992;74(4):620–623. PubMed
Miyagi N., Iisaka H., Yasuda K., Kaneda K. Onset of ossification of the tarsal bones in congenital clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(1):36–40. PubMed
Aurell Y., Andriesse H., Johansson A., Jonsson K. Ultrasound assessment of early clubfoot treatment: a comparison of the Ponseti method and a modified Copenhagen method. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14(5):347–357. PubMed
Aurell Y., Johansson A., Hansson G., Jonsson K. Ultrasound anatomy in the neonatal clubfoot. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(10):2509–2517. PubMed
Hamel J., Becker W. Sonographic assessment of clubfoot deformity in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5(4):279–286. PubMed
Maiza D., Themar-Noel C., Legrand I., Bensahel H., Hassan M. Ultrasonographic approach to the neonatal foot: preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(2):123–128. PubMed
Chandrakanth U., Sudesh P., Gopinathan N., Prakash M., Goni V.G. Tarsal bone dysplasia in clubfoot as measured by ultrasonography: can it be used as a prognostic indicator in congenital idiopathic Clubfoot? A prospective observational study. J Pediatr Orthop J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Oct-Nov;36(7):725–729. PubMed
Abdelgawad A.A., Lehman W.B., van Bosse H.J., Scher D.M., Sala Da. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16(2):98–105. PubMed
Aurell Y., Johansson A., Hansson G., Wallander H., Jonsson K. Ultrasound anatomy in the normal neonatal and infant foot: an anatomic introduction to ultrasound assessment of foot deformities. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(9):2306–2312. PubMed
El-Adwar K.L., Taha Kotb H. The role of ultrasound in clubfoot treatment: correlation with the Pirani score and assessment of the Ponseti method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(9):2495–2506. PubMed PMC
Suda R., Suda A.J., Grill F. Sonographic classification of idiopathic clubfoot according to severity. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15(2):134–140. PubMed
Desai S., Aroojis A., Mehta R. Ultrasound evaluation of clubfoot correction during Ponseti treatment: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(1):53–59. PubMed