Invasive forest pathogens in Europe: Cross-country variation in public awareness but consistency in policy acceptability
Jazyk angličtina Země Švédsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
BiodivERsA
Seventh Framework Programme
PubMed
29572607
PubMed Central
PMC6297109
DOI
10.1007/s13280-018-1046-7
PII: 10.1007/s13280-018-1046-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Media, Multilevel models, Problem awareness, Risk experience, Tree diseases,
- MeSH
- lesy * MeSH
- postup * MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Political action can reduce introductions of diseases caused by invasive forest pathogens (IPs) and public support is important for effective prevention. The public's awareness of IP problems and the acceptability of policies aiming to combat these pathogens were surveyed in nine European countries (N = 3469). Although awareness of specific diseases (e.g., ash dieback) varied, problem awareness and policy acceptability were similar across countries. The public was positive towards policies for informational measures and stricter standards for plant production, but less positive towards restricting public access to protected areas. Multilevel models, including individual and country level variables, revealed that media exposure was positively associated with awareness of IP problems, and strengthened the link between problem awareness and policy acceptability. Results suggest that learning about IPs through the media and recognizing the associated problems increase policy acceptability. Overall, the study elaborates on the anthropogenic dimension of diseases caused by IPs.
Biotic Stress Group AgroBioInstitute Agricultural Academy 8 Dragan Tzankov Blvd 1164 Sofia Bulgaria
Department of Botany Faculty of Forestry Süleyman Demirel University 32600 Isparta Turkey
Department of Geography and Economic History Umeå University 901 87 Umeå Sweden
Department of Psychology Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research PO Box 115 1431 Ås Norway
UMR1202 BIOGECO INRA University Bordeaux 33610 Cestas France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Brasier CM. Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: Dunne CP, editor. The Elms: Breeding, conservation and disease management. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 61–72.
Cushman JH, Meentemeyer RK. Multi-scale patterns of human activity and the incidence of an exotic forest pathogen. Journal of Ecology. 2008;96:766–776. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01376.x. DOI
Demski C, Capstick S, Pidgeon N, Sposato RG, Spence A. Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change. 2017;140:149–164. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Desprez-Loustau ML. Alien fungi of Europe. In: Hulme PE, Nentwig W, Pysek P, Vilá M, editors. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. pp. 15–28.
DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. In: Bickman L, Rog DJ, editors. Applied social research method series. 3. California: Sage; 2012.
Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich; 1993.
Elliott K, Swank W. Long-term changes in forest composition and diversity following early logging (1919–1923) and the decline of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) Plant Ecology. 2008;197:155–172. doi: 10.1007/s11258-007-9352-3. DOI
Eurostat. 2016. Statistics explained. Retrieved April 4, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/d/de/Wood_production%2C_2000%E2%80%9314_%28thousand_m%C2%B3%29_YB16.png.
Fellenor J, Barnett J, Potter C, Urquhart J, Mumford JD, Quine CP. The social amplification of risk on Twitter: The case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom. Journal of Risk Research. 2017 doi: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1281339. DOI
Flint C, Qin H, Ganning JP. Linking local perceptions to the iophysical and amenity contexts of forest disturbance in Colorado. Environmental Management. 2012;49:553–569. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9802-5. PubMed DOI PMC
FOREST EUROPE. 2015. State of Europe’s Forests 2015. Retrieved April 4, 2017, from http://www.foresteurope.org/docs/fullsoef2015.pdf.
Fuller L, Marzano M, Peace A, Quine CP, Dandy N. Public acceptance of tree health management: Results of a national survey in the UK. Environmental Science & Policy. 2016;59:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.007. DOI
Hayes AF. A Primer on Multilevel Modeling. Human Communication Research. 2006;32:385–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x. DOI
Hulme PE, Pysek P, Nentwig W, Vilà M. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science. 2009;324:40–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1171111. PubMed DOI
Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble RL, Kasperson JX, Ratick S. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis. 1988;8:177–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x. DOI
Klapwijk MJ, Hopkins AJM, Eriksson L, Pettersson M, Schroeder M, Lindelöw Å, Rönnberg J, Keskitalo ECH, et al. Reducing the risk of invasive forest pests and pathogens: Combining legislation, targeted management and public awareness. Ambio. 2016;45:223–234. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0748-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Jakobsson C, Fujii S, Gärling T. Determinants of private car users’ acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy. 2000;7:153–158. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00005-6. DOI
Jepson P, Arakelyan I. Exploring public perceptions of solutions to tree diseases in the UK: Implications for policy-makers. Environmental Science & Policy. 2017;76:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.008. PubMed DOI PMC
Jung T, Orlikowski L, Henricot B, Abad-Campos P, Aday AG, Aguín Casal O, Bakonyi J, Cassiola SO, et al. Widespread Phytophthora infestations in European nurseries put forest, semi-natural and horticultural ecosystems at high risk of Phytophthora diseases. Forest Patholology. 2016;46:134–163. doi: 10.1111/efp.12239. DOI
Liebhold AM, Brockerhoff EG, Garrett LJ, Parke JL, Britton KO. Live plant imports: The major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US. Frontiers in Ecology Environment. 2012;10:135–143. doi: 10.1890/110198. DOI
Lovett GM, Weiss M, Liebhold AM, Holmes TP, Leung B, Lambert KF, Orwig DA, Campbell FT, et al. Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options. Ecological Applications. 2016;26:1437–1455. doi: 10.1890/15-1176. PubMed DOI PMC
Marzano M, Dandy N, Bayliss HR, Porth E, Potter C. Part of the solution? Stakeholder awareness, information and engagement in tree health issues. Biological Invasions. 2015;17:1961–1977. doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-0850-2. DOI
McDonald RI, Chai HY, Newell BR. Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2015;44:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003. DOI
Peugh JL. A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology. 2010;48:85–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002. PubMed DOI
Porth EF, Dandy N, Marzano M. “My garden is the one with no trees:” Residential lived experiences of the 2012 Asian Longhorn Beetle eradication programme in Kent, England. Human Ecology. 2015;43:669–679. doi: 10.1007/s10745-015-9788-3. DOI
Potter C, Urquhart J. Tree disease and pest epidemics in the Anthropocene: A review of the drivers, impacts and policy responses in the UK. Forest Policy and Economics. 2017;79:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.024. DOI
Qin, H., and C.G. Flint. 2010. Capturing community context of human response to forest disturbance by insects: A multi-method assessment. Human Ecology 38: 567–579. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40928143. PubMed PMC
Reser JP, Swim JK. Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. American Psychologist. 2011;66:277–289. doi: 10.1037/a0023412. PubMed DOI
Reser JP, Bradley GL, Ellul MC. Encountering climate change: ‘Seeing’ is more than ‘believing’. WIREs Climate Change. 2014;5:521–537. doi: 10.1002/wcc.286. DOI
Roques A, Rabitsch W, Rasplus JY, Lopez Vaamonde C, Nentwig W, Kenis M. Alien terrestrial invertebrates of Europe. In: Drake JA, editor. Handbook of alien species in Europe, DAISIE. Invading nature, series in invasion ecology. Berlin: Springer; 2009. pp. 63–79.
Santini A, Ghelardini L, De Pace C, Desprez-Loustau ML, Capretti P, Chandelier A, Cech T, Chira D, et al. Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytologist. 2013;197:238–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04364.x. PubMed DOI
Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G. An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2014;38:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002. DOI
Stenlid J, Oliva J. Phenotypic interactions between tree hosts and invasive forest pathogens in the light of globalization and climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2016;371:20150455. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0455. PubMed DOI PMC
Stern PC. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56:407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175. DOI
Tomlinson I. The discovery of ash dieback in the UK: The making of a focusing event. Environmental Politics. 2016;25:709–728. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1118790. DOI
Urquhart J, Potter C, Barnett J, Fellenor J, Mumford J, Quine CP, Bayliss H. Awareness, concern and willingness to adopt biosecure behaviours: Public perceptions of invasive tree pests and pathogens in the UK. Biological Invasions. 2017;19:2567–2582. doi: 10.1007/s10530-017-1467-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Weinstein ND. Effects of personal experience on self-protective behaviour. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;105:31–50. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.31. PubMed DOI
Woodward S, Boa E. Ash dieback in the UK: A wake-up call. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2013;14:856–860. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12084. PubMed DOI PMC