Parental care compromises feeding in the pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus)
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
2011/01/D/NZ8/01807
NCN Poland
PubMed
29582140
PubMed Central
PMC5869894
DOI
10.1007/s00114-018-1554-0
PII: 10.1007/s00114-018-1554-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Alternative mating strategy, Bayesian inference, Filial cannibalism, Male mating polymorphism, Parental care, Territoriality,
- MeSH
- chov MeSH
- otcovské chování fyziologie MeSH
- Perciformes fyziologie MeSH
- sexuální faktory MeSH
- stravovací zvyklosti fyziologie MeSH
- velikost těla fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Providing parental care is potentially costly. Costs can arise through elevated energy expenditure or from an increased risk of mortality. A cost of parental care can also occur because a parent is compromised in their ability to forage. We used pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus, a fish with an alternative male mating strategy, to test whether parental males differed in their feeding in comparison with females and cuckolder males. To address this question, we examined the stomach contents of female, cuckolder male, and parental male pumpkinseed during the breeding season over an entire diel cycle. We showed that parental males had a lower total weight of food in their stomachs in comparison with females, while cuckolder males did not. Parental males also had a lower weight and number of chironomids in their stomachs. The temporal pattern of feeding of parental males diverged from that of females, and they had a lower probability of pupal chironomids in their stomachs, which implies spatial segregation in foraging. Parental males had a greater probability of conspecific eggs in their stomachs than females, while the probability of egg cannibalism did not differ between cuckolder males and females. Overall, these finding meet predictions in accordance with an assumption that parental care and territoriality can compromise feeding.
Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology University of Łódź Banacha 12 16 90 237 Łódź Poland
Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program Trent University Peterborough ON K9J 7B8 Canada
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Aday DD, Philipp DP, Wahl DH. Sex-specific life history patterns in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus): interacting mechanisms influence individual body size. Oecologia. 2006;147:31–38. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0242-x. PubMed DOI
Almeida D, Almodóvar A, Nicola GG, Elvira B. Feeding tactics and body condition of two introduced populations of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus: taking advantages of human disturbances? Ecol Freshw Fish. 2009;18:15–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00317.x. DOI
Alonso-Alvarez C, Velando A. Benefits and costs of parental care. In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, editors. The evolution of parental care. Oxford: Oxford University press; 2012. pp. 40–61.
Armitage PD. Chironomidae as food. In: Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LCV, editors. The Chironomidae. Dordrecht: Springer; 1995.
Balshine-Earn S. The costs of parental care in Galilee St Peters fish, Sarotherodon galilaeus. Anim Behav. 1995;50:1–7. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1995.0214. DOI
Bhattacharya CG. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into Gaussian components. Biometrics. 1967;23:115–135. doi: 10.2307/2528285. PubMed DOI
Boujard T, Leatherland JF. Circadian rhythms and feeding time in fishes. Environ Biol Fish. 1992;35:109–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00002186. DOI
Clutton-Brock TH. The evolution of parental care. Press, Princeton: Princeton Univ; 1991.
Collins NC, Hinch SG. Diel and seasonal variation in foraging activities of pumpkinseeds in an Ontario pond. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1993;122:357–365. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<0357:DASVIF>2.3.CO;2. DOI
Cooke SJ, Philipp DP, Wahl DH, Weatherhead PJ. Energetics of parental care in six syntopic centrarchid fishes. Oecologia. 2006;148:235–249. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0375-6. PubMed DOI
Copp GH, Fox MG, Przybylski M, Godinho FN. Life-time growth patterns of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus introduced to Europe, relative to native North American populations. Folia Zool. 2004;53:237–254.
Declerck S, Louette G, De Bie T, De Meester L. Patterns of diet overlap between populations of non-indigenous and native fishes in shallow ponds. J Fish Biol. 2002;61:1182–1197. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02464.x. DOI
Dodson JJ, Aubin-Horth N, Thériault V, Páez DJ. The evolutionary ecology of alternative migratory tactics in salmonid fishes. Biol Rev. 2013;88:602–625. doi: 10.1111/brv.12019. PubMed DOI
Feldmeth CR. Costs of aggression in trout and pupfish. In: Asprey WP, Lustick SI, editors. Behavioural energetics—the cost of survival in vertebrates. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1983. pp. 117–138.
García-Berthou E, Moreno-Amich R. Food of introduced pumpkinseed sunfish: ontogenetic diet shift and seasonal variation. J Fish Biol. 2000;57:29–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00773.x. DOI
Godinho FN, Ferriera MT, Cortes RV. The environmental basis of diet variation in pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus, and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, along the Iberian river basin. Environ Biol Fish. 1997;50:105–115. doi: 10.1023/A:1007302718072. DOI
Gross MR. Cuckoldry in sunfishes (Lepomis: Centrarchidae) Can J Zool. 1979;57:1507–1509. doi: 10.1139/z79-197. DOI
Gross MR. Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Ethology. 1982;60:1–26.
Gross MR. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:92–98. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81050-0. PubMed DOI
Johnson JH, Dropkin DS. Diel variation in diet composition of a riverine fish community. Hydrobiologia. 1993;271:149–158. doi: 10.1007/BF00005412. DOI
Jordan C, Backe N, Wright MC, Tovey CP (2009) Biological synopsis of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus). Can Manuscr Rep Fish Aquat Sci 2886: iv + 16 p
Keast A, Welsh L. Daily feeding periodicities, food uptake rates and dietary changes with hour of day in some lake fishes. J Fish Res Board Can. 1968;25:1133–1144. doi: 10.1139/f68-099. DOI
Klug H, St Mary CM. Reproductive fitness consequences of filial cannibalism in the flagfish, Jordanella floridae. Anim Behav. 2005;70:685–691. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.015. DOI
Klug H, Lindström K, St. Mary CM. Parents benefit from eating offspring: density-dependent egg survivorship compensates for filial cannibalism. Evolution. 2006;60:2087–2095. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01846.x. PubMed DOI
Klug H, Alonzo SH, Bonsall MB. Theoretical foundations of parental care. In: Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, editors. The evolution of parental care. Oxford: Oxford University press; 2012. pp. 21–39.
Maazouzi C, Médoc V, Pihan JC, Masson G. Size-related dietary changes observed in young-of-the-year pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus): stomach contents and fatty acid analyses. Aquat Ecol. 2010;45:23–33. doi: 10.1007/s10452-010-9320-1. DOI
Mank JE, Promislow DEL, Avise JC. Phylogenetic perspectives in the evolution of parental care in ray-finned fishes. Evolution. 2005;59:1570–1578. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01806.x. PubMed DOI
Mittelbach GG, Osenberg CW, Wainwright PC. Variation in feeding morphology between pumpkinseed populations: phenotypic plasticity or evolution? Evol Ecol Res. 1999;1:111–128.
Nikolova M, Uzunova E, Studenkov S, Georgieva M, Pehlivanov L, Velkov B. Feeding patterns and seasonal variation in the diet of non-indigenous fish species Lepomis gibbosus L. from shallow eutrophic lakes along River Vit, Bulgaria. Natura Montenegrina. 2008;7:71–85.
Payne AG, Smith C, Campbell AC. Filial cannibalism improves survival and development of beaugregory damselfish embryos. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol. 2002;269:2095–2102. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2144. PubMed DOI PMC
Persson L. Food consumption and the significance of detritus and algae to intraspecific competition in roach Rutilus rutilus in a shallow eutrophic lake. Oikos. 1983;41:118–125. doi: 10.2307/3544353. DOI
R Development Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
Rezsu E, Specziár A. Ontogenetic diet profiles and size-dependent diet partitioning of ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus, perch Perca fluviatilis and pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus in Lake Balaton. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2006;15(3):339–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00172.x. DOI
Rios-Cardenas O. Patterns of parental investment and sexual selection in teleost fishes: do they support Bateman’s principles? Integr Comp Biol. 2005;45:885–894. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.5.885. PubMed DOI
Rios-Cardenas O, Webster MS. Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish. Behav Ecol. 2005;16:914–921. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ari076. DOI
Rohwer S. Parent cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat. 1978;112(984):429–440. doi: 10.1086/283284. DOI
Rue H, Riebler A, Sørbye SH, Illian JB, Simpson DP, Lindgren FK. Bayesian computing with INLA: a review. Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2017;4:395–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054045. DOI
Scott WB, Crossman EJ. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fish Res Board Can Bull. 1973;184:713–718.
Shuster SM. Alternative mating strategies. In: Fox C, Westneat DF, editors. Evolutionary behavioral ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 434–450.
Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, Royle NJ. In: The evolution of parental care. Oxford. Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M, editors. Oxford: University Press; 2012. pp. 1–17.
Smith C. Filial cannibalism as a reproductive strategy in care-giving teleosts? Neth J Zool. 1992;42:607–613. doi: 10.1163/156854292X00107. DOI
Smith C, Reay PJ. Cannibalism in teleost fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1991;1:41–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00042661. DOI
Smith C, Wootton RJ. The costs of parental care in Haplochromis “argens” (Cichlidae) Environ Biol Fish. 1994;40:99–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00002184. DOI
Smith C, Wootton RJ. The costs of parental care in teleost fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1995;5:7–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01103363. DOI
Smith C, Wootton RJ. Parental energy expenditure of the male three-spined stickleback. J Fish Biol. 1999;54:1132–1136. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00866.x. DOI
Taborsky M. Alternative reproductive tactics in fish. In: Oliviera RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ, editors. Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 251–299.
Thorp JH, Goldsmith LD, Polgreen JA, Mayer LM. Foraging patterns of nesting and nonnesting sunfish (Centrarchidae: Lepomis auritus and L. gibbosus) Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1989;46:1342–1346. doi: 10.1139/f89-172. DOI
Williams GC. Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat. 1966;100:687–690. doi: 10.1086/282461. DOI
Wolfram-Wais A, Wolfram G, Auer B, Mikschi E, Hain A. Feeding habits of two introduced fish species (Lepomis gibbosus, Pseudorasbora parva) in Neusiedler See (Austria), with special reference to chironomid larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae) Hydrobiologia. 1999;408(409):123–129. doi: 10.1023/A:1017014130103. DOI
Wootton RJ. The ecology of teleost fishes. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1998.
Wootton RJ, Smith C (2015) Reproductive biology of teleost fishes. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford 496
Yavno S, Rooke AC, Fox MG. Morphological change and phenotypic plasticity in native and non-native pumpkinseed sunfish in response to competition. Naturwissenschaften. 2014;101:479–492. doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1177-z. PubMed DOI
Zięba G, Smith C, Fox MG, Yavno S, Záhorská E, Przybylski M, Masson G, Cucherousset J, Verreycken H, Van Kleef HH, Copp GH (2018) Red operculum spots, body size, maturation and evidence for a satellite male phenotype in non-native European populations of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus. Ecol Freshw Fish. 10.1111/eff.12399