Can Exercise Targeting Mid-Thoracic Spine Segmental Movement Reduce Back Pain and Improve Sensory Perception in Cross-Country Skiers?
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
30439725
DOI
10.1097/jsm.0000000000000699
PII: 00042752-202103000-00015
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Back Pain physiopathology prevention & control MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Touch Perception physiology MeSH
- Thoracic Vertebrae physiology MeSH
- Physical Conditioning, Human methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Skiing injuries physiology MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pain Perception physiology MeSH
- Movement MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of exercise targeting proper trunk stabilization and segmental spinal movement in back pain and sensory perception among cross-country skiers. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial with blinded outcome assessors. SETTING: University Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty elite cross-country skiers aged 17 to 27 years. INTERVENTIONS: Ten cross-country skiers integrated 3 types of exercise targeting segmental motion in mid-thoracic spine into their routine training practice for 2 months. The 10 controls performed routine athletic training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Young Spine Questionnaire to measure intensity and frequency of back pain was completed at the start and end of study. Tactile sensory perception using 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, thermic perception using TIP THERM device, graphesthesia assessed by a touch monitor pencil, 2-point discrimination assessed by a digital caliper, and vibration perception assessed by a 128-Hz tuning fork measured in mid-thoracic spine 5 times. RESULTS: No significant group differences in pain and sensory perception were identified at baseline. Over the 2-month study interval, repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that the experimental group improved significantly relative to the control group on pain intensity (P = 0.005 for cervical, P = 0.004 for thoracic, and P = 0.014 for lumbar) and frequency of pain in the thoracic area only (P = 0.011). Improvements were also observed in the experimental relative to control group on graphesthesia (P < 0.001), vibration perception (P = 0.002), and 2-point discrimination (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise targeting the mid-thoracic spine may decrease back pain and improve sensory perception in cross-country skiers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Original research, level I.
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
School of Aging Studies University of South Florida Tampa Florida; and
See more in PubMed
Frank BC. Risk of injuries, symptoms of excessive strain and preventive possibilities in cross-country skiing. A comparison between classical technique and skating technique [German]. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1995;9:103–108.
Eriksson K, Németh G, Eriksson E. Low back pain in elite cross-country skiers. A retrospective epidemiological study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1996;6:31–35.
Alricsson M, Björklund G, Cronholm M, et al. Spinal alignment, mobility of the hip and thoracic spine and prevalence of low back pain in young elite cross-country skiers. J Exerc Rehabil. 2016;12:21–28.
Bergstrøm KA, Brandseth K, Fretheim S, et al. Back injuries and pain in adolescents attending a ski high school. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:80–85.
Renstrom P, Johnson RJ. Cross-country skiing injuries and biomechanics. Sports Med Auckl NZ. 1989;8:346–370.
Foss IS, Holme I, Bahr R. The prevalence of low back pain among former elite cross-country skiers, rowers, orienteerers, and nonathletes: a 10-year cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2610–2616.
Bahr R, Andersen SO, Løken S, et al. Low back pain among endurance athletes with and without specific back loading—a cross-sectional survey of cross-country skiers, rowers, orienteerers, and nonathletic controls. Spine. 2004;29:449–454.
Alricsson M, Werner S. The effect of pre-season dance training on physical indices and back pain in elite cross-country skiers: a prospective controlled intervention study. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:148–153.
Alricsson M, Werner S. Self-reported health, physical activity and prevalence of complaints in elite cross-country skiers and matched controls. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45:547–552.
Mahlamäki S, Soimakallio S, Michelsson JE. Radiological findings in the lumbar spine of 39 young cross-country skiers with low back pain. Int J Sports Med. 1988;9:196–197.
Federolf P, Bakker E. Muscle activation characteristics in cross-country skiers with a history of anterior compartment pain. Sports Biomech. 2012;11:452–463.
Hintermann B. Overuse damage in modern cross-country skiing [German]. Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1993(suppl 1):274–285.
Lawson GE, Hung LY, Ko GD, et al. A case of pseudo-angina pectoris from a pectoralis minor trigger point caused by cross-country skiing. J Chiropr Med. 2011;10:173–178.
Roosink M, McFadyen BJ, Hébert LJ, et al. Assessing the perception of trunk movements in military personnel with chronic non-specific low back pain using a virtual mirror. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120251.
Hidalgo B, Gobert F, Bragard D, et al. Effects of proprioceptive disruption on lumbar spine repositioning error in a trunk forward bending task. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26:381–387.
Wand BM, Di Pietro F, George P, et al. Tactile thresholds are preserved yet complex sensory function is impaired over the lumbar spine of chronic non-specific low back pain patients: a preliminary investigation. Physiotherapy. 2010;96:317–323.
Rabey M, Slater H, O'Sullivan P, et al. Somatosensory nociceptive characteristics differentiate subgroups in people with chronic low back pain: a cluster analysis. Pain. 2015;156:1874–1884.
Moseley GL. I can't find it! Distorted body image and tactile dysfunction in patients with chronic back pain. Pain. 2008;140:239–243.
Luomajoki H, Moseley GL. Tactile acuity and lumbopelvic motor control in patients with back pain and healthy controls. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:437–440.
Lauridsen HH, Hestbaek L. Development of the young spine questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:185.
Kobesova A, Valouchova P, Kolar P. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization: exercises based on developmental kinesiology models. Functional Training Handbook. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
Kobesova A, Safarova M, Kolar P. Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization: exercise in developmental positions to achieve spinal stability and functional joint centration. Oxford Textbook of Musculoskeletal Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016;678–689.
Gutknecht M, Mannig A, Waldvogel A, et al. The effect of motor control and tactile acuity training on patients with non-specific low back pain and movement control impairment. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19:722–731.
Trapp W, Weinberger M, Erk S, et al. A brief intervention utilising visual feedback reduces pain and enhances tactile acuity in CLBP patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28:651–660.
Wojtys EM, Ashton-Miller JA, Huston LJ, et al. The association between athletic training time and the sagittal curvature of the immature spine. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:490–498.
Alricsson M, Werner S. Young elite cross-country skiers and low back pain—A 5-year study. Phys Ther Sport. 2006;7:181–184.
Hodges PW, Moseley GL. Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13:361–370.
Lotze M, Moseley GL. Role of distorted body image in pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9:488–496.