Although school climate and self-efficacy have received some attention in the literature, as correlates of students' willingness to intervene in bullying, to date, very little is known about the potential mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between classroom climate and students' willingness to intervene in bullying. To this end, the present study analyzes whether the relationship between classroom cohesion (as one facet of classroom climate) and students' willingness to intervene in bullying situations is mediated by self-efficacy in social conflicts. This study is based on a representative stratified random sample of two thousand and seventy-one students (51.3% male), between the ages of twelve and seventeen, from twenty-four schools in Germany. Results showed that between 43% and 48% of students reported that they would not intervene in bullying. A mediation test using the structural equation modeling framework revealed that classroom cohesion and self-efficacy in social conflicts were directly associated with students' willingness to intervene in bullying situations. Furthermore, classroom cohesion was indirectly associated with higher levels of students' willingness to intervene in bullying situations, due to self-efficacy in social conflicts. We thus conclude that: (1) It is crucial to increase students' willingness to intervene in bullying; (2) efforts to increase students' willingness to intervene in bullying should promote students' confidence in dealing with social conflicts and interpersonal relationships; and (3) self-efficacy plays an important role in understanding the relationship between classroom cohesion and students' willingness to intervene in bullying. Recommendations are provided to help increase adolescents' willingness to intervene in bullying and for future research.

Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus Senftenberg Institute of Health Sciences 01968 Senftenberg Germany

Department of Educational Studies University of Potsdam 14476 Potsdam Germany

Department of Psychology Pennsylvania State University PA 16802 USA

Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University 60200 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kowalski R.M., Giumetti G.W., Schroeder A.N., Lattanner M.R. Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol. Bull. 2014;140:1073–1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618. PubMed DOI

Bauman S., Toomey R.B., Walker J.L. Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. J. Adolesc. 2013;36:341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001. PubMed DOI

Eslea M., Menesini E., Morita Y., O’Moore M., Mora-Merchán J.A., Pereira B., Smith P.K. Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: Data from seven countries. Aggress. Behav. 2004;30:71–83. doi: 10.1002/ab.20006. DOI

Olweus D. Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 2012;9:520–538. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.682358. DOI

Solberg M.E., Olweus D. Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggress. Behav. 2003;29:239–268. doi: 10.1002/ab.10047. DOI

Salmivalli C. Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. J. Adolesc. 1999;22:453–459. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0239. PubMed DOI

Salmivalli C. Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggress. Viol. Behav. 2010;15:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007. DOI

Wachs S., Schubarth W., Scheithauer H., Hess M. Mobbing an Schulen: Erkennen-Handeln-Vorbeugen. Kohlhammer Verlag; Stuttgart, Germany: 2016.

Salmivalli C. Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Pract. 2014;53:286–292. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2014.947222. DOI

Wachs S., Bilz L., Niproschke S., Schubarth W. Bullying Intervention in Schools: A Multilevel Analysis of Teachers’ Success in Handling Bullying from the Students’ Perspective. J. Early Adolesc. 2018 doi: 10.1177/0272431618780423. DOI

Sainio M., Veenstra R., Huitsing G., Salmivalli C. Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2011;35:144–151. doi: 10.1177/0165025410378068. DOI

Lynn Hawkins D., Pepler D.J., Craig W.M. Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Soc. Dev. 2001;10:512–527. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00178. DOI

Rivers I., Poteat V.P., Noret N., Ashurst N. Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. Sch. Psychol. Q. 2009;24:211–223. doi: 10.1037/a0018164. DOI

Wachs S. Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: Differences by participant role. Emot. Behav. Diffic. 2012;17:347–360. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2012.704318. DOI

Evans C.B., Smokowski P.R., Rose R.A., Mercado M.C., Marshall K.J. Cumulative Bullying Experiences, Adolescent Behavioral and Mental Health, and Academic Achievement: An Integrative Model of Perpetration, Victimization, and Bystander Behavior. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2018:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1078-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Craig W.M., Pepler D.J. Observations of bullying and victimization in the school yard. Can. J. Sch. Psychol. 1998;13:41–59. doi: 10.1177/082957359801300205. DOI

Espelage D., Green H., Polanin J. Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students: Individual and peer-group influences. J. Early Adolesc. 2012;32:776–801. doi: 10.1177/0272431611423017. DOI

Rigby K., Johnson B. Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educ. Psychol. 2006;26:425–440. doi: 10.1080/01443410500342047. DOI

Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freedom and Company; New York, NY, USA: 1997.

Connolly J. Social self-efficacy in adolescence: Relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 1989;21:258. doi: 10.1037/h0079809. DOI

Thornberg R., Jungert T. Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. J. Adolesc. 2013;36:475–483. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003. PubMed DOI

Thornberg R., Tenenbaum L., Varjas K., Meyers J., Jungert T., Vanegas G. Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene? West. J. Emerg. Med. 2012;13:247. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792. PubMed DOI PMC

Pöyhönen V., Juvonen J., Salmivalli C. What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Q. 2010;56:143–163. doi: 10.1353/mpq.0.0046. DOI

Pöyhönen V., Juvonen J., Salmivalli C. Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Soc. Dev. 2012;21:722–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x. DOI

van der Ploeg R., Kretschmer T., Salmivalli C., Veenstra R. Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers? J. Sch. Psychol. 2017;65:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002. PubMed DOI

Gini G., Albiero P., Benelli B., Altoe G. Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. J. Adolesc. 2008;31:93–105. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002. PubMed DOI

Pozzoli T., Gini G. Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2010;38:815–827. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9. PubMed DOI

Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: London, UK: 1979.

Espelage D.L. Ecological theory: Preventing youth bullying, aggression, and victimization. Theory Pract. 2014;53:257–264. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2014.947216. DOI

Polanin J.R., Espelage D.L., Pigott T.D. A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs’ Effects on Bystander Intervention Behavior. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2012;41:47–65.

Wernick L.J., Kulick A., Inglehart M. Influences of peers, teachers, and climate on students’ willingness to intervene when witnessing anti-transgender harassment. J. Adolesc. 2014;37:927–935. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.06.008. PubMed DOI

Goldammer L., Swahn M.H., Strasser S.M., Ashby J.S., Meyers J. An examination of bullying in Georgia schools: Demographic and school climate factors associated with willingness to intervene in bullying situations. West. J. Emerg. Med. 2013;14:324. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.3.15637. PubMed DOI PMC

Thornberg R., Wänström L., Hong J.S., Espelage D.L. Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis. J. School Psychol. 2017;63:49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.002. PubMed DOI

Schunk D.H., Meece J.L. Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In: Pajares F., Urdan T., editors. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Volume 5. IAP; Greenwich, CT, USA: 2006. pp. 71–96.

Schunk D.H., Miller S.D. Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In: Pajares F., Urdan T., editors. Academic Motivation of Adolescents. Volume 2. IAP; Greenwich, CT, USA: 2002. pp. 29–52.

Yoon J.S., Kerber K. Bullying: Elementary teachers’ attitudes and intervention strategies. Res. Educ. 2003;69:27–35. doi: 10.7227/RIE.69.3. DOI

Jerusalem M., Klein-Heßling J. Skalendokumentation der Lehrer- und Schülerskalen des Projektes, Sicher und Gesund in der Schule (SIGIS) Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin, Germany: 2002. Soziale Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung.

Fend H., Prester H.G. Dokumentation der Skalen des Projektes Entwicklung im Jugendalter. Universität Konstanz; Konstanz, Germany: 1986.

Trach J., Hymel S., Waterhouse T., Neale K. Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Can. J. Sch. Psychol. 2010;25:114–130. doi: 10.1177/0829573509357553. DOI

Muthen L.K., Muthen B.O. Mplus [Computer Software] Muthén & Muthén; Los Angeles, CA, USA: 1998.

Naylor P., Cowie H., del Rey R. Coping strategies of secondary school children in response to being bullied. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Rev. 2001;6:114–120. doi: 10.1017/S1360641701002647. DOI

Jenkins L.N., Nickerson A.B. Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention. Aggress. Behav. 2017;43:281–290. doi: 10.1002/ab.21688. PubMed DOI

Nucci L. Classroom management for moral and social development. In: Evertson C., Weinstein C., editors. Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; Mahwah, NJ, USA: 2011. pp. 711–731.

Juvonen J., Galván A. Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In: Prinstein M.J., Dodge K.A., editors. Duke Series in Child Development and Public Policy. Understanding peer Influence in Children and Adolescents. Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2008. pp. 225–244.

Associations among Adolescents' Relationships with Parents, Peers, and Teachers, Self-Efficacy, and Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: A Social Cognitive Approach