Ratings of activities of daily living in nursing home residents: comparison of self- and proxy ratings with actual performance and the impact of cognitive status
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Germany Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30532672
PubMed Central
PMC6250645
DOI
10.1007/s10433-018-0456-5
PII: 456
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- ADL, Agreement, Differences, Nursing home residents, Proxy reports, Self-reports,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
This study was conducted to examine differences between self- and proxy ratings of activities in daily living (ADL) in nursing home residents and to compare them with actual performance. An impact of cognitive status on these ratings was also determined. Data were obtained from 164 dyads of nursing home residents (self-ratings) and their professional care providers (proxy ratings). Statistical procedures included t tests, intraclass correlations, Pearson's correlations, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and ROC curves. Paired t test provided evidence that residents in general overestimated their abilities for all ADLs (p < .01 in all cases), but a substantial subset of 54 residents, with mean MMSE of 18, agreed with their care providers. The mean MMSE score of those who overestimated their abilities was 13 (N = 57). The ANOVA revealed that greater rating differences were associated with more severe cognitive impairment (MMSE, F = 9.93, p < .001). Proxy ratings of walking were not significantly different from actual performances (p = .145), while self-ratings overestimated it (p < .001). Although residents in general overestimated their ADL abilities and results of comparison with actual performance indicated that proxies may be closer to the actual status in this population, a considerable number of those with milder cognitive impairment were able to assess their ADLs with reasonable accuracy.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Ruská 2411 87 100 00 Prague 10 Czech Republic
Centre of Gerontology Šimůnkova 1600 182 00 Prague 8 Czech Republic
Faculty of Humanities Charles University U Kříže 8 158 00 Prague 5 Czech Republic
School of Aging Studies University of South Florida 4202 E Fowler Ave Tampa FL 33620 USA
See more in PubMed
Angel RJ, Ostir GV, Frisco ML, Markides KS. Comparison of self-reported and a performance-based assessment of mobility in the Hispanic Established Population for Epidemiological Studies of the Elderly. Res Aging. 2000;22(6):715–737. doi: 10.1177/0164027500226006. DOI
Angel RJ, Angel JL, Hill TD. A comparison of the health of older Hispanics in the United States and Mexico: methodological challenges. J Aging Health. 2008;20(1):3–31. doi: 10.1177/0898264307309924. PubMed DOI PMC
Binder EF, Miller JP, Ball LJ. Development of a test of physical performance for the nursing home setting. Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):671–679. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.5.671. PubMed DOI
Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW, Nicklas BJ, Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Tylavsky FA, Brach JS, Satterfield S, Bauer DC, Visser M, Rubin SM, Harris TB, Pahor M. Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people—results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1675–1680. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53501.x. PubMed DOI
Cotter EM, Burgio LD, Stevens AB, Roth DL, Gitlin LN. Correspondence of the functional independence measure (FIM) self-care subscale with real-time observations of dementia patients’ ADL performance in the home. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(1):36–45. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr465oa. PubMed DOI
Cress ME, Ferrucci L, Studenski S, Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Gill TM, Espeland MA, Nayfield S, Romanshkin S, Eldadah B. Functional outcomes for clinical trials in frail older persons: time to be moving. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63(2):160–164. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.2.160. PubMed DOI PMC
Edgington ES. Randomization tests. New York: M. Dekker; 1995.
Farias ST, Mungas D, Jagust W. Degree of discrepancy between self and other-reported everyday functioning by cognitive status: dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy elders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20(9):827–834. doi: 10.1002/gps.1367. PubMed DOI PMC
Farrow DC, Samet JM. Comparability of information provided by elderly cancer patients and surrogates regarding health and functional status, social network, and life events. Epidemiology. 1990;1(5):370–376. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199009000-00006. PubMed DOI
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. PubMed DOI
Gerstenecker A, Mast BT, Shah S, Meeks S. Tracking the cognition of nursing home residents. Clin Gerontol. 2014;37:286–297. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2014.885921. DOI
Gill TM, Williams CS, Tinetti ME. Assessing risk for the onset of functional dependence among older adults: the role of physical performance. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:603–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07192.x. PubMed DOI
Hofmann H, Hahn S. Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(21–22):3012–3024. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12384. PubMed DOI
Holmerova I, Juraskova B, Zikmundova K. Vybrane kapitoly z gerontologie. Praha: Cas; 2003.
Jiang S, Li P. Current development in elderly comprehensive assessment and research methods. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3528248. PubMed PMC
Jirak R. Evaluation of psychological functioning in the elderly. In: Kalvach Z, Zadak Z, Jirak R, editors. Geriatrics and gerontology. Prague: Grada Publishing; 2004.
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. PubMed DOI
Kirk RE. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. 3. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1995.
Kiyak HA, Teri L, Borson S. Physical and functional health assessment in normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease: self-reports vs family reports. Gerontologist. 1994;34(3):324–330. doi: 10.1093/geront/34.3.324. PubMed DOI
Koren MJ. Person-centered care for nursing home residents: the culture-change movement. Health Aff. 2010;29(2):312–317. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0966. PubMed DOI
Li M, Harris I, Lu ZK. Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Loewenstein DA, Rubert MP. Staging functional impairment in dementia using performance based measures: a preliminary analysis. J Ment Health Aging. 1995;1:47–56.
Loewenstein DA, Arguelles S, Bravo M, Freeman RQ, Arguelles T, Acevedo A, Eisdorfer C. Caregivers’ judgments of the functional abilities of the Alzheimer’s disease patient: a comparison of proxy reports and objective measures. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(2):P78–P84. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.2.P78. PubMed DOI
Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR, Gruber-Baldini A. Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(3):283–292. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008740. PubMed DOI
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65. PubMed
Mast BT. Methods for assessing the person with Alzheimer’s disease: integrating person-centered and diagnostic approaches to assessment. Clin Gerontol. 2012;35:360–375. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2012.702647. DOI
Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67(6):387–389. PubMed
Miller LS, Brown CL, Mitchell MB, Williamson GM. Activities of daily living are associated with older adult cognitive status: caregiver versus self-reports. J Appl Gerontol. 2013;32(1):3–30. doi: 10.1177/0733464811405495. PubMed DOI
Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE, Phillips CD, Mor V, Katz S, Murphy K, Drugovich ML, Friedlob AS. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1990;30(3):293–307. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.3.293. PubMed DOI
Morris JN, Belleville-Taylor P, Fries BE, Hawes C, Murphy K, Mor V, Nonemaker S, Phillips CD, Berg K, Bjorkgren M, et al. interRAI long-term care facilities (LTCF) assessment form and user’s manual. Version 9.1. Washington: interRAI; 2009.
Neumann PJ, Araki SS, Gutterman EM. The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(12):1646–1654. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03877.x. PubMed DOI
Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. Hamilton: Bc Decker; 2008.
Nunnally JC, Bernestein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1994.
Onder G, Carpenter I, Finne-Soveri H, Gindin J, Frijters D, Henrard JC, Nikolaus T, Topinkova E, Tosato M, Liperoti R, et al. Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the services and health for elderly in long term care (SHELTER) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Ostbye T, Tyas S, McDowell I, Koval J. Reported activities of daily living: agreement between elderly subjects with and without dementia and their caregivers. Age Ageing. 1997;26(2):99–106. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.2.99. PubMed DOI
Puente AN, Terry DP, Faraco CC, Brown CL, Miller LS. Functional impairment in mild cognitive impairment evidenced using performance-based measurement. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014;27(4):253–258. doi: 10.1177/0891988714532016. PubMed DOI
Rubenstein LZ, Schairer C, Wieland GD, Kane R. Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: effects of different data sources. J Gerontol. 1984;39(6):686–691. doi: 10.1093/geronj/39.6.686. PubMed DOI
Santos-Eggimann B, Zobel F, Berod AC. Functional status of elderly home care users: do subjects, informal and professional caregivers agree? J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(3):181–186. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00155-3. PubMed DOI
Schwenk M, Howe C, Saleh A, Mohler J, Grewal G, Armstrong D, Najafi B. Frailty and technology: a systematic review of gait analysis in those with frailty. Gerontology. 2014;60:79–89. doi: 10.1159/000354211. PubMed DOI PMC
Sheikh J, Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale: recent findings and development of a short version. In: Brink TL, editor. Clinical gerontology: a guide to assessment and intervention. New York: Howarth Press; 1986.
Snow AL, Cook KF, Lin PS, Morgan RO, Magaziner J. Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(5 Pt 2):1676–1693. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00447.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Tanizaki H. Power comparison of non-parametric tests: small-sample properties from Monte Carlo experiments. J Appl Stat. 1997;24:603–632. doi: 10.1080/02664769723576. DOI
Tiku ML. Power function of the F-test under non-normal situations journal of the American Statistical Association. J Am Stat Assoc. 1971;66(336):913–916.
Valk M, Post MW, Cools HJ, Schrijvers GA. Measuring disability in nursing home residents: validity and reliability of a newly developed instrument. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(3):P187–P191. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.3.P187. PubMed DOI
Weinberger M, Samsa GP, Schmader K, Greenberg SM, Carr DB, Wildman DS. Comparing proxy and patients’ perceptions of patients’ functional status: results from an outpatient geriatric clinic. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(6):585–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02107.x. PubMed DOI