Environmental stressors can be key drivers of phenotypes, including reproductive strategies and morphological traits. The response to stress may be altered by the presence of microbial associates. For example, in aphids, facultative (secondary) bacterial symbionts can provide protection against natural enemies and stress induced by elevated temperatures. Furthermore, aphids exhibit phenotypic plasticity, producing winged (rather than wingless) progeny that may be better able to escape danger, and the combination of these factors improves the response to stress. How symbionts and phenotypic plasticity, both of which shape aphids' stress response, influence one another, and together influence host fitness, remains unclear. In this study, we investigate how environmental stressors drive shifts in fecundity and winged/wingless offspring production, and how secondary symbionts influence the process. We induced production of winged offspring through distinct environmental stressors, including exposure to aphid alarm pheromone and crowding, and, in one experiment, we assessed whether the aphid response is influenced by host plant. In the winged morph, energy needed for wing maintenance may lead to trade-offs with other traits, such as reproduction or symbiont maintenance. Potential trade-offs between symbiont maintenance and fitness have been proposed but have not been tested. Thus, beyond studying the production of offspring of alternative morphs, we also explore the influence of symbionts across wing/wingless polyphenism as well as symbiont interaction with cross-generational impacts of environmental stress on reproductive output. All environmental stressors resulted in increased production of winged offspring and shifts in fecundity rates. Additionally, in some cases, aphid host-by-symbiont interactions influenced fecundity. Stress on first-generation aphids had cross-generational impacts on second-generation adults, and the impact on fecundity was further influenced by the presence of secondary symbionts and presence/absence of wings. Our study suggests a complex interaction between beneficial symbionts and environmental stressors. Winged aphids have the advantage of being able to migrate out of danger with more ease, but energy needed for wing production and maintenance may come with reproductive costs for their mothers and for themselves, where in certain cases, these costs are altered by secondary symbionts.

Czech Academy of Sciences Biology Centre Institute of Entomology Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

Department of Biology Clayton State University Morrow Georgia

Department of Biology O Wayne Rollins Research Center Emory University Atlanta Georgia

Department of Biology University of Rochester Rochester New York

Department of Ecosystem Science and Management Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania

Department of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK

See more in PubMed

Barribeau SM, Sok D & Gerardo NM (2010) Aphid reproductive investment in response to mortality risks. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 251. PubMed PMC

Bates M, Maechler M, Bolker B & Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.

Brisson JA (2010) Aphid wing dimorphisms: linking environmental and genetic control of trait variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 605–616. PubMed PMC

Brisson JA, Ishikawa A & Miura T (2010) Wing development genes of the pea aphid and differential gene expression between winged and unwinged morphs. Insect Molecular Biology, 19, 63–73. PubMed

Buchner P (1965) Endosymbiosis of Animal with Plant Microorganisms John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Douglas A (1998) Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 17–37. PubMed

Fautin DG, Guo C-C & Hwang J-S (1995) Costs and benefits of the symbiosis between the anemoneshrimp Periclimenes brevicarpalis and its host Entacmaea quadricolor. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 59, 77–84.

Frederickson ME, Ravenscraft A, Miller GA, Arcila Hernández LM, Booth G & Pierce NE (2012) The direct and ecological costs of an ant-plant symbiosis. The American Naturalist, 179, 768–778. PubMed

Grantham ME, Antonio CJ, O’Neil BR, Zhan YX & Brisson JA (2016) A case for a joint strategy of diversified bet hedging and plasticity in the pea aphid wing polyphenism. Biology Letters, 12, 20160654. PubMed PMC

Groeters FR & Dingle H (1989) The cost of being able to fly in the milkweed-oleander aphid, Aphis nerii (Homoptera: Aphididae). Evolutionary Ecology, 3, 313–326.

Hansen AK, Vorburger C & Moran NA (2012) Genomic basis of endosymbiont-conferred protection against an insect parasitoid. Genome Research, 22, 106–114. PubMed PMC

Harmon JP, Moran NA & Ives AR (2009) Species response to environmental change: impacts of food web interactions and evolution. Science, 323, 1347–1350. PubMed

Hatano E, Kunert G & Weisser WW (2010) Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions. PLoS ONE, 5, e11188. PubMed PMC

Hedges LM, Brownlie JC, O’neill SL & Johnson KN (2008) Wolbachia and virus protection in insects. Science, 322, 702–702. PubMed

Henry LM, Peccoud J, Simon J-C, Hadfield JD, Maiden MJ, Ferrari J & Godfray HCJ (2013) Horizontally transmitted symbionts and host colonization of ecological niches. Current Biology, 23, 1713–1717. PubMed PMC

Himler AG, Adachi-Hagimori T, Bergen JE, Kozuch A, Kelly SE, Tabashnik BE, Chiel E, Duckworth VE, Dennehy TJ & Zchori-Fein E (2011) Rapid spread of a bacterial symbiont in an invasive whitefly is driven by fitness benefits and female bias. Science, 332, 254–256. PubMed

Horgan FG & Ferrater JB (2017) Benefits and potential trade‐offs associated with yeast‐like symbionts during virulence adaptation in a phloem‐feeding planthopper. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 163, 112–125.

Kitano H & Oda K (2006) Robustness trade‐offs and host–microbial symbiosis in the immune system. Molecular systems biology, 2, 10.1038/msb4100039. PubMed DOI PMC

Kunert G, Otto S, Röse US, Gershenzon J & Weisser WW (2005) Alarm pheromone mediates production of winged dispersal morphs in aphids. Ecology Letters, 8, 596–603.

Leclair M, Polin S, Jousseaume T, Simon JC, Sugio A, Morlière S, Fukatsu T, Tsuchida T & Outreman Y (2017) Consequences of coinfection with protective symbionts on the host phenotype and symbiont titres in the pea aphid system. Insect Science, 24, 798–808. PubMed

Lees A (1967) The production of the apterous and alate forms in the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton, with special reference to the role of crowding. Journal of Insect Physiology, 13, 289–318.

Leonardo TE & Mondor EB (2006) Symbiont modifies host life-history traits that affect gene flow. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1079–1084. PubMed PMC

Losey JE & Denno RF (1998) The escape response of pea aphids to foliar‐foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour. Ecological Entomology, 23, 53–61.

Łukasik P, Dawid MA, Ferrari J & Godfray HCJ (2013a) The diversity and fitness effects of infection with facultative endosymbionts in the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. Oecologia, 173, 985–996. PubMed

Łukasik P, van Asch M, Guo H, Ferrari J & Godfray CJ (2013b) Unrelated facultative endosymbionts protect aphids against a fungal pathogen. Ecology Letters, 16, 214–218. PubMed

Margulis L & Fester R (1991) Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation: speciation and morphogenesis MIT Press. PubMed

McLean A, Van Asch M, Ferrari J & Godfray H (2011) Effects of bacterial secondary symbionts on host plant use in pea aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 760–766. PubMed PMC

McLean AH, Parker BJ, Hrček J, Kavanagh J, Wellham PA & Godfray HCJ (2017) Consequences of symbiont co‐infections for insect host phenotypes. Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.12705. PubMed DOI

Montllor CB, Maxmen A & Purcell AH (2002) Facultative bacterial endosymbionts benefit pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum under heat stress. Ecological Entomology, 27, 189–195.

Müller CB, Williams IS & Hardie J (2001) The role of nutrition, crowding and interspecific interactions in the development of winged aphids. Ecological Entomology, 26, 330–340.

Näpflin K & Schmid-Hempel P (2016) Immune response and gut microbial community structure in bumblebees after microbiota transplants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 283, 20160312. PubMed PMC

Oliver KM, Russell JA, Moran NA & Hunter MS (2003) Facultative bacterial symbionts in aphids confer resistance to parasitic wasps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 1803–1807. PubMed PMC

Parker BJ, Hrček J, McLean AH & Godfray HCJ (2017) Genotype specificity among hosts, pathogens, and beneficial microbes influences the strength of symbiont‐mediated protection. Evolution, 71, 1222–1231. PubMed PMC

Parker BJ, Spragg CJ, Altincicek B & Gerardo NM (2013) Symbiont-mediated protection against fungal pathogens in pea aphids: a role for pathogen specificity? Applied and environmental microbiology, 79, 2455–2458. PubMed PMC

Pickett J, Wadhams L, Woodcock C & Hardie J (1992) The chemical ecology of aphids. Annual Review of Entomology, 37, 67–90.

Pineda A, Dicke M, Pieterse CM & Pozo MJ (2013) Beneficial microbes in a changing environment: are they always helping plants to deal with insects? Functional Ecology, 27, 574–586.

Polin S, Simon JC & Outreman Y (2014) An ecological cost associated with protective symbionts of aphids. Ecology and Evolution, 4, 836–840. PubMed PMC

Porter SS & Rice KJ (2013) Trade-offs, spatial heterogeneity, and the maintenance of microbial diversity. Evolution, 67, 599–608. PubMed

Reyes ML, Laughton AM, Parker BJ, Wichmann H, Fan M, Sok D, Hrček J, Acevedo T & Gerardo NM (2018) Data from: The influence of symbiotic bacteria on reproductive strategies and wing polyphenism in pea aphids responding to stress. Dryad Digital Repository 10.5061/dryad.pv952ps. PubMed DOI PMC

Rodriguez RJ, Redman RS & Henson JM (2004) The role of fungal symbioses in the adaptation of plants to high stress environments. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 9, 261–272.

Roitberg BD & Myers JH (1978) Adaptation of alarm pheromone responses of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 56, 103–108.

Russell JA & Moran NA (2006) Costs and benefits of symbiont infection in aphids: variation among symbionts and across temperatures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 603–610. PubMed PMC

Sandström J & Moran N (1999) How nutritionally imbalanced is phloem sap for aphids? Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, pp. 203–210. Springer.

Scarborough CL, Ferrari J & Godfray H (2005) Aphid protected from pathogen by endosymbiont. Science, 310, 1781–1781. PubMed

Storeck A, Poppy GM, Emden H.F.v. & Powell W (2000) The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani. Entomologica Experimentalis et Applicata, 97, 41–46.

Sutherland O (1969) The role of crowding in the production of winged forms by two strains of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Insect Physiology, 15, 1385–1410.

Thesing J, Kramer J, Koch LK & Meunier J (2015) Short-term benefits, but transgenerational costs of maternal loss in an insect with facultative maternal care. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 282, 20151617. PubMed PMC

Tsuchida T, Koga R, Matsumoto S & Fukatsu T (2011) Interspecific symbiont transfection confers a novel ecological trait to the recipient insect. Biology Letters, 7, 245–248. PubMed PMC

Vorburger C, Gehrer L & Rodriguez P (2010) A strain of the bacterial symbiont Regiella insecticola protects aphids against parasitoids. Biology Letters, 6, 109–111. PubMed PMC

Zytynska SE & Weisser WW (2016) The natural occurrence of secondary bacterial symbionts in aphids. Ecological Entomology, 41, 13–26.

The influence of symbiotic bacteria on reproductive strategies and wing polyphenism in pea aphids responding to stress

See more in PubMed

Dryad
10.5061/dryad.pv952ps