• This record comes from PubMed

Impact of acceptor splice site NAGTAG motif on exon recognition

. 2019 Jun ; 46 (3) : 2877-2884. [epub] 20190306

Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
16-34414A Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
201606 Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation

Links

PubMed 30840204
DOI 10.1007/s11033-019-04734-6
PII: 10.1007/s11033-019-04734-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Pre-mRNA splicing is an essential step in gene expression, when introns are removed and exons joined by the complex of proteins called spliceosome. Correct splicing requires a precise exon/intron junction definition, which is determined by a consensual donor and acceptor splice site at the 5' and 3' end, respectively. An acceptor splice site (3'ss) consists of highly conserved AG nucleotides in positions E-2 and E-1. These nucleotides can appear in tandem, located 3 bp from each other. Then they are referred to as NAGNAG or tandem 3'ss, which can be alternatively spliced. NAG/TAG 3'ss motif abundance is extremely low and cannot be easily explained by just a nucleotide preference in this position. We tested artificial NAG/TAG motif's potential negative effect on exon recognition using a minigene assay. Introducing the NAG/TAG motif into seven different exons revealed no general negative effect on exon recognition. The only observed effect was the partial use of the newly formed distal 3'ss. We can conclude that this motif's extremely low preference in a natural 3'ss is not a consequence of the NAG/TAG motif's negative effect on exon recognition, but more likely the result of other RNA processing aspects, such as an alternative 3'ss choice, decreased 3'ss strength, or incorporating an amber stop codon.

See more in PubMed

BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Mar 21;8:89 PubMed

Nat Genet. 2008 Dec;40(12):1413-5 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 2015 Jul 8;589(15):1766-70 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(16):5487-98 PubMed

Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006 PubMed

Genome Res. 2003 Jul;13(7):1631-7 PubMed

PLoS Biol. 2012 Jan;10(1):e1001229 PubMed

Cell. 1986 Nov 21;47(4):555-65 PubMed

Nat Genet. 2004 Dec;36(12):1255-7 PubMed

J Comput Biol. 2004;11(2-3):377-94 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov 1;39(20):8928-37 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 May;39(10):4396-404 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(11):3569-79 PubMed

Hum Mol Genet. 1998 May;7(5):919-32 PubMed

Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Aug;27(16):5835-48 PubMed

Trends Genet. 2008 May;24(5):246-55 PubMed

PLoS Genet. 2006 Apr;2(4):e45 PubMed

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e89570 PubMed

Hum Mutat. 2009 Nov;30(11):1543-50 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 03;34(1):23-31 PubMed

Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;78(2):291-302 PubMed

RNA. 2006 Dec;12(12):2047-56 PubMed

PLoS Genet. 2010 Oct 07;6(10): PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...