Impact of acceptor splice site NAGTAG motif on exon recognition
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
16-34414A
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
201606
Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation
PubMed
30840204
DOI
10.1007/s11033-019-04734-6
PII: 10.1007/s11033-019-04734-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Acceptor splice site, NAGNAG motif, Pre-mRNA splicing, Tandem acceptor splice site,
- MeSH
- Alternative Splicing MeSH
- Exons * MeSH
- HeLa Cells MeSH
- Introns MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- RNA Splice Sites genetics physiology MeSH
- Nucleotides genetics MeSH
- Base Sequence MeSH
- RNA Splicing genetics MeSH
- Tandem Repeat Sequences MeSH
- Codon, Terminator MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- RNA Splice Sites MeSH
- Nucleotides MeSH
- Codon, Terminator MeSH
Pre-mRNA splicing is an essential step in gene expression, when introns are removed and exons joined by the complex of proteins called spliceosome. Correct splicing requires a precise exon/intron junction definition, which is determined by a consensual donor and acceptor splice site at the 5' and 3' end, respectively. An acceptor splice site (3'ss) consists of highly conserved AG nucleotides in positions E-2 and E-1. These nucleotides can appear in tandem, located 3 bp from each other. Then they are referred to as NAGNAG or tandem 3'ss, which can be alternatively spliced. NAG/TAG 3'ss motif abundance is extremely low and cannot be easily explained by just a nucleotide preference in this position. We tested artificial NAG/TAG motif's potential negative effect on exon recognition using a minigene assay. Introducing the NAG/TAG motif into seven different exons revealed no general negative effect on exon recognition. The only observed effect was the partial use of the newly formed distal 3'ss. We can conclude that this motif's extremely low preference in a natural 3'ss is not a consequence of the NAG/TAG motif's negative effect on exon recognition, but more likely the result of other RNA processing aspects, such as an alternative 3'ss choice, decreased 3'ss strength, or incorporating an amber stop codon.
See more in PubMed
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Mar 21;8:89 PubMed
Nat Genet. 2008 Dec;40(12):1413-5 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 2015 Jul 8;589(15):1766-70 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(16):5487-98 PubMed
Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006 PubMed
Genome Res. 2003 Jul;13(7):1631-7 PubMed
PLoS Biol. 2012 Jan;10(1):e1001229 PubMed
Cell. 1986 Nov 21;47(4):555-65 PubMed
Nat Genet. 2004 Dec;36(12):1255-7 PubMed
J Comput Biol. 2004;11(2-3):377-94 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov 1;39(20):8928-37 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 May;39(10):4396-404 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jun;37(11):3569-79 PubMed
Hum Mol Genet. 1998 May;7(5):919-32 PubMed
Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Aug;27(16):5835-48 PubMed
Trends Genet. 2008 May;24(5):246-55 PubMed
PLoS Genet. 2006 Apr;2(4):e45 PubMed
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e89570 PubMed
Hum Mutat. 2009 Nov;30(11):1543-50 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 03;34(1):23-31 PubMed
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;78(2):291-302 PubMed
RNA. 2006 Dec;12(12):2047-56 PubMed
PLoS Genet. 2010 Oct 07;6(10): PubMed