• This record comes from PubMed

Cohesive Energy Densities Versus Internal Pressures of Near and Supercritical Fluids

. 2019 Mar 08 ; 24 (5) : . [epub] 20190308

Language English Country Switzerland Media electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
19-00742S Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Links

PubMed 30857238
PubMed Central PMC6429217
DOI 10.3390/molecules24050961
PII: molecules24050961
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Over half a century ago, Wiehe and Bagley suggested that a product of the internal pressure and molar volume of a liquid measures the energy of nonspecific intermolecular interactions whereas the cohesive energy reflects the total energy of intermolecular interactions in the liquid. This conjecture, however, has never been considered in connection with near and supercritical fluids. In this contribution, the cohesive energy density, internal pressure and their ratios are calculated from high precision equations of state for eight important fluids including water. To secure conformity to the principle of corresponding states when comparing different fluids, the calculations are carried out along the line defined by equality between the reduced temperature and the reduced pressure of the fluid (Tr = Pr). The results provide additional illustration of the tunability of the solvent properties of water that stands apart from those of other near and supercritical fluids in common use. In addition, an overview is also presented of the derivatives of cohesive energy density, solubility parameter and internal pressure with respect to temperature, pressure and molar volume.

See more in PubMed

Harvey A.H., Friend D.G. Physical properties of water. In: Palmer D.A., Fernández-Prini R., Harvey A.H., editors. Aqueous Systems at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures. Physical Chemistry in Water, Steam and Hydrothermal Solutions. Elsevier–Academic Press; London, UK: 2004. pp. 1–27. Chapter 1.

Weingärtner H., Franck E.U. Supercritical water as a solvent. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:2672–2692. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462468. PubMed DOI

Uematsu M., Franck E.U. Static dielectric constant of water and steam. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1980;9:1291–1304. doi: 10.1063/1.555632. DOI

Fernández D.P., Goodwin A.R.H., Lemmon E.W., Levelt Sengers J.M.H., Williams R.C. A formulation for the static permittivity of water and steam at temperatures from 238 K to 873 K at pressures up to 1200 MPa, including derivatives and Debye–Hückel coefficients. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1997;26:1125–1166. doi: 10.1063/1.555997. DOI

Marshall W.L., Franck E.U. Ion product of water substance, 0–1000 °C, 1–10,000 bars. New international formulation and its background. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1981;10:295–304. doi: 10.1063/1.555643. DOI

Bandura A.V., Lvov S.N. The ionization constant of water over wide ranges of temperature and density. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2006;35:15–30. doi: 10.1063/1.1928231. DOI

Reichardt C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 3rd ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; Weinheim, Germany: 2003. pp. 329–388. Chapter 6.

Wiehe I.A., Bagley E.B. Estimation of dispersion and hydrogen bonding energies in liquids. AIChE J. 1967;13:836–838. doi: 10.1002/aic.690130505. DOI

Prausnitz J.M., Lichtenthaler R.N., Gomes de Azevedo E. Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 1999. pp. 313–326. Section 7.2.

Wagner W., Overhoff U. ThermoFluids. Interactive Software for the Calculation of Thermodynamic Properties for More Than 60 Pure Substances. Springer-Verlag; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2006.

NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP) [(accessed on 7 February 2019)]; Available online: https://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop.

Lemmon E.W., Span R. Short fundamental equations of state for 20 industrial fluids. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2006;51:785–850. doi: 10.1021/je050186n. DOI

Span R., Wagner W. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1996;25:1509–1596. doi: 10.1063/1.555991. DOI

Dillon H.E., Penoncello S.G. A fundamental equation for calculation of the thermodynamic properties of ethanol. Int. J. Thermophys. 2004;25:321–335. doi: 10.1023/B:IJOT.0000028470.49774.14. DOI

de Reuck K.M., Craven R.J.B. International Thermodynamic Tables of the Fluid State–Vol. 12: Methanol. Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford, UK: 1993.

Span R., Wagner W. Equations of state for technical applications. II. Results for nonpolar fluids. Int. J. Thermophys. 2003;24:41–109. doi: 10.1023/A:1022310214958. DOI

Penoncello S.G., Shan Z., Jacobsen R.T. A fundamental equation for the calculation of the thermodynamic properties of trifluoromethane (R-23) ASHRAE Trans. 2000;106:739–756.

Tillner-Roth R., Baehr H.D. An international standard equation of state for the thermodynamic properties of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a) for temperatures from 170 K to 455 K at pressures up to 70 MPa. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1994;23:657–729. doi: 10.1063/1.555958. DOI

Wagner W., Pruss A. The IAPWS formulation 1995 for the thermodynamic properties of ordinary water substance for general and scientific use. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2002;31:387–535. doi: 10.1063/1.1461829. DOI

Lewis W.C.M. Internal, molecular, or intrinsic pressure—A survey of the various expressions proposed for its determination. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1911;7:94–115. doi: 10.1039/TF9110700094. DOI

Hildebrand J.H. Solubility III. Relative values of internal pressures and their practical application. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1919;41:1067–1080. doi: 10.1021/ja02228a004. DOI

Dack M.R.J. The importance of solvent internal pressure and cohesion to solution phenomena. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1975;4:211–229. doi: 10.1039/cs9750400211. DOI

Marcus Y. Internal pressure of liquids and solutions. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:6536–6551. doi: 10.1021/cr3004423. PubMed DOI

Chorążewski M., Postnikov E.B., Oster K., Polishuk I. Thermodynamic properties of 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-dibromoethane under elevated pressures: Experimental results and predictions of a novel DIPPR-based version of FT-EoS, PC-SAFT, and CP-PC-SAFT. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015;54:9645–9656. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02626. DOI

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...