Interactions of human butyrylcholinesterase with phenylvalerate and acetylthiocholine as substrates and inhibitors: kinetic and molecular modeling approaches
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
50AV0050RP
Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche - International
306156/2015-6
CNPq - International
PubMed
30877329
DOI
10.1007/s00204-019-02423-8
PII: 10.1007/s00204-019-02423-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Docking, Human butyrylcholinesterase, Inhibition kinetics, Molecular dynamics, Phenyl valerate,
- MeSH
- Acetylthiocholine metabolism MeSH
- Butyrylcholinesterase metabolism MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Models, Molecular * MeSH
- Molecular Docking Simulation MeSH
- Valerates metabolism MeSH
- Binding Sites MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Acetylthiocholine MeSH
- Butyrylcholinesterase MeSH
- phenyl valerate MeSH Browser
- Valerates MeSH
Phenyl valerate (PV) is a substrate for measuring the PVase activity of neuropathy target esterase (NTE), a key molecular event of organophosphorus-induced delayed neuropathy. A protein with PVase activity in chicken (model for delayed neurotoxicity) was identified as butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). Purified human butyrylcholinesterase (hBChE) showed PVase activity with a similar sensitivity to inhibitors as its cholinesterase (ChE) activity. Further kinetic and theoretical molecular simulation studies were performed. The kinetics did not fit classic competition models among substrates. Partially mixed inhibition was the best-fitting model to acetylthiocholine (AtCh) interacting with PVase activity. ChE activity showed substrate activation, and non-competitive inhibition was the best-fitting model to PV interacting with the non-activated enzyme and partial non-competitive inhibition was the best fitted model for PV interacting with the activated enzyme by excess of AtCh. The kinetic results suggest that other sites could be involved in those activities. From the theoretical docking analysis, we deduced other more favorable sites for binding PV related with Asn289 residue, situated far from the catalytic site ("PV-site"). Both substrates acethylcholine (ACh) and PV presented similar docking values in both the PV-site and catalytic site pockets, which explained some of the observed substrate interactions. Molecular dynamic simulations based on the theoretical structure of crystallized hBChE were performed. Molecular modeling studies suggested that PV has a higher potential for non-competitive inhibition, being also able to inhibit the hydrolysis of ACh through interactions with the PV-site. Further theoretical studies also suggested that PV could yet be able to promote competitive inhibition. We concluded that the kinetic and theoretical studies did not fit the simple classic competition among substrates, but were compatible with the interaction with two different binding sites.
References provided by Crossref.org