Comparison of titer results obtained using immediate spin one-dilution techniques to a reference method
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
30980760
DOI
10.1111/trf.15170
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- ABO Blood-Group System blood MeSH
- Indicator Dilution Techniques MeSH
- Isoantibodies blood MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Blood Group Incompatibility blood MeSH
- Specimen Handling methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- ABO Blood-Group System MeSH
- Isoantibodies MeSH
BACKGROUND: Many transfusion services determine the titer of potentially incompatible plasma-containing products by performing a one-dilution titer at their selected titer threshold. This study compared the results of immediate spin (IS) one-dilution titers determined by three methods with a reference standard method. METHODS: Plasma-containing products from group A and O donors were titered using the participant's routine IS one-dilution titer method. No time or temperature incubations were performed, and antihuman globulin reagent was not used. The samples were then tested using a reference method, which was a saline tube test with a 1-hour room temperature incubation; antihuman globulin was not used in the reference method. The results of the one-dilution titer were then compared to that obtained in the reference method. RESULTS: Nine centers participated in this study. There were 698 antibodies from 374 units tested by the manual IS tube one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.92), and specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00). There were 412 antibodies from 206 units tested by the manual and automated IS buffered gel card one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). There were 98 antibodies from 49 units tested by an automated microplate IS one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and specificity was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). All three methods had an accuracy rate of 90% or greater. CONCLUSION: The manual and automated one-dilution titer methods are suitable for screening plasma-containing units, although more evaluation of the automated microplate method might be required.
Blood Transfusion and Tissue Department University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Blood Transfusion Department Regional Hospital Karlovy Vary Prague Czech Republic
Department of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Regional Hospital Liberec Liberec Czech Republic
Department of Hemotherapy and Cell Terapy Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Sao Paulo Brazil
Department of Pathology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
The Institute for Transfusion Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
References provided by Crossref.org