Extended Timed Up & Go test: Is walking forward and returning back to the chair equivalent gait?
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30982536
DOI
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.001
PII: S0021-9290(19)30247-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Gait analysis, Instrumented gait, Timed Up&Go,
- MeSH
- Gait Analysis methods MeSH
- Spatio-Temporal Analysis MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Walking physiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Parkinson Disease physiopathology MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The Timed Up & Go test (TUG) is functional test and is a part of routine clinical examinations. The instrumented Timed Up & Go test enables its segmentation to sub-tasks: sit-to-stand, walking forward, turning, walking back, stand-to-sit, and consequently the computation of task-specific parameters and sub-tasks separately. However, there are no data on whether walking forward parameters differ from the walking back parameters. This study tested the differences between walking forward and walking back in the TUG extended to 10 m for 17 spatio-temporal gait parameters. All parameters were obtained from a GAITRite® pressure sensitive walkway (CIR Systems, Inc.). The differences were assessed for healthy controls and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. None of investigated parameters exhibited a difference between both gait subtasks for healthy subjects group. Five parameters of interest, namely velocity, step length, stride length, stride velocity, and the proportion of the double support phase with respect to gait cycle duration, showed a statistically significant difference between gait for walking forward and walking back in PD patients. Therefore, we recommend a separate assessment for walking forward and walking back rather than averaging both gaits together.
References provided by Crossref.org