Sex-specific mechanisms of the determination of insect body sizes are insufficiently understood. Here we use the common heath moth, Ematurga atomaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) to examine how larval growth trajectories differ between males and females. We monitored the development of 1379 larvae in controlled laboratory conditions. Sexually dimorphic development times during the first four instars were associated with sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in the beginning of the fifth (last) instar, when females were on average 15% heavier than males. Similarly, the duration of the last instar was about 13% longer in females. Further, we specifically focussed on the estimates of differential (instantaneous) growth rates of the larvae based on 24h mass increments of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th day in the beginning of the last instar. We calculated 'allometric' differential growth rates as the per-day increase in cube-root-transformed mass of the larvae. We found that allometric growth rates were slightly but significantly larger in females than in males. As this measure of growth rate (in contrast to the relative growth rate, based on the ratio of masses recorded at consecutive measurements) did not depend on body size, it allows an unambiguous separation of the effects of sex and size. We conclude that in accordance with an emerging general pattern, larger female body size in E. atomaria is achieved primarily by means of a longer growth period. Furthermore, our study shows that the differential growth rate can also be sexually dimorphic and contribute to SSD. This contribution, however, is lower than that of the development time by an order of magnitude. In addition to development periods and growth rates, other parameters of the non-linear growth curves of insect larvae also need to be considered in the context of SSD determination. In particular, weight loss prior to pupation was shown to be considerably larger in females than in males.

Department of Zoology Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Blanckenhorn WU. Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethol. 2005;111: 977–1016.

Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, size, and gender roles Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2007.

Teder T, Tammaru T. Sexual size dimorphism within species increases with body size in insects. Oikos. 2005;108: 321–334.

Foellmer MW, Moya-Laraño J. Sexual size dimorphism in spiders: patterns and processes In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2007. pp. 71–81.

Stillwell RC, Blanckenhorn WU, Teder T, Davidowitz G, Fox CW. Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55: 227–245. 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085500 PubMed DOI PMC

Monnet J-M, Cherry MI. Sexual size dimorphism in anurans. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]. 2002;269: 2301–2307. PubMed PMC

Cox RM, Butler MA, John-Alder HB. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in reptiles In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2007. pp. 38–49.

Szekely T, Lislevand T, Figuerola J. Sexual size dimorphism in birds In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2007. pp. 27–37.

Webb TJ, Freckleton RP. Only half right: species with female biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch’s rule. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2(9): e897 10.1371/journal.pone.0000897 PubMed DOI PMC

Isaac JL. Potential causes and life-history consequences of sexual size dimorphism in mammals. Mammal Rev. 2005;35: 101–115.

Lindenfors P, Gittleman JL, Jones KE. Sexual size dimorphism in mammals In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2007. pp. 16–26.

Reeve JP, Fairbairn DJ. Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity. Heredity 1999;83: 697–706. PubMed

Kuntner M, Coddington JA. Discovery of the largest orbweaving spider species: the evolution of gigantism in Nephila. PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(10): e7516 10.1371/journal.pone.0007516 PubMed DOI PMC

Cheng RC, Kuntner M. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders. Evolution 2014;68–10: 2861–2872. PubMed

Blanckenhorn WU. The evolution of body size–what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol. 2000;75: 385–407. PubMed

Allen CE, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56: 445–64. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144828 PubMed DOI

Kuntner M, Elgar MA. Evolution and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism: aligning phylogenetic and experimental evidence. Front Ecol Evolut. 2014. 10.3389/fevo.2014.00026 DOI

Badyaev AV. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol Evolut. 2002;17: 369–378.

Nijhout HF, Riddiford LM, Mirth C, Shingleton AW, Suzuki Y, Callier V. The developmental control of size in insect. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology 2014;3: 113–134. 10.1002/wdev.124 PubMed DOI PMC

Stillwell RC, Daws A, Davidowitz G. The ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism of a moth: when do males and females grow apart? PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(9): e106548 10.1371/journal.pone.0106548 PubMed DOI PMC

Budriene A, Budrys E, Nevronyte Z. Sexual size dimorphism in the ontogeny of the solitary predatory wasp Symmorphus allobrogus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Comptes Rendus Biologie 2013;336: 57–64. PubMed

Esperk T, Tammaru T, Nylin S, Teder T. Achieving high sexual size dimorphism in insects: females and instars. Ecol Entomol. 2007;32: 243–256.

Molleman F, Javoiš J, Esperk T, Teder T, Davis RB, Tammaru T. Sexual differences in weight loss upon eclosion are related to life history strategy in Lepidoptera. J Insect Physiol. 2011;57: 712−722. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.02.009 PubMed DOI

Testa N, Ghosh SM, Shingleton AW. Sex-specific weight loss mediates sexual size dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(3): e58936 10.1371/journal.pone.0058936 PubMed DOI PMC

Vendl T, Šípek P, Kouklík O, Kratochvíl L. Hidden complexity in the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in male-larger beetles. Nature Scientific Reports 2018;8:5871. PubMed PMC

Stillwell RC, Davidowitz G. A developmental perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of a moth. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]. 2010; 277: 2069–2074. PubMed PMC

Tammaru T, Esperk T, Ivanov V, Teder T. Proximate sources of sexual size dimorphism in insects: locating constraints on larval growth schedules. Evol Ecol 2010;24: 161–175.

Teder T. Sexual size dimorphism requires a corresponding sex difference in development time: a meta-analysis in insects. Funct Ecol. 2014;28: 479–486.

Wormington JD, Juliano SA. Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Evolut Ecol Res. 2014;16: 223–234. PubMed PMC

Blanckenhorn WU, Dixon AFG, Fairbarn DJ, Foellmer MW, Gibert P, Linde K. Proximate causes of Rensch’s rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? Am Nat. 2007;169: 245–257. 10.1086/510597 PubMed DOI

Knapp M. Emergence of sexual size dimorphism and stage-specific effects of elevated temperature on growth rate and development rate in Harmonia axyridis. Physiol Entomol. 2014;39: 341–347.

Rohner PT, Blanckenhorn WU, Puniamoorthy N. Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development. Evolution 2016;70: 1189–1199. 10.1111/evo.12944 PubMed DOI

Mikolajewski DJ, Wohlfahrt B, Joop G, Beckerman AP. Sexual size dimorphism and the integration of phenotypically plastic traits. Ecol Entomol. 2013;38: 418–428.

Meister H, Esperk T, Välimäki P, Tammaru T. Evaluating the role and measures of juvenile growth rate: latitudinal variation in insect life histories. Oikos 2017;126: 1726–1737.

Higgins LE, Rankin MA. Different pathways in arthropod postembryonic development. Evolution 1996;50: 573–582. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03869.x PubMed DOI

Esperk T, Tammaru T. Does the 'investment principle' model explain moulting strategies in lepidopteran larvae? Physiol Entomol. 2004;29: 56–66.

Tammaru T, Esperk T. Growth allometry of immature insects: Larvae do not grow exponentially. Funct Ecol. 2007;21: 1099–1105.

Esperk T, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Wiklund A, Kaasik A, Tammaru T. Distinguishing between anticipatory and responsive plasticity in a seasonally polyphenic butterfly. Evol Ecol. 2013;27: 315–332.

Rohner PT, Blanckenhorn WU, Schäfer MA. Critical weight mediates sex-specific body size plasticity and sexual dimorphism in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera:Scathophagidae). Evolution and Development. 2017;19: 147–156. 10.1111/ede.12223 PubMed DOI

Lovich JE, Gibbons JW. A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth, Development and Aging 1992;56: 269–281. PubMed

Leraut P. Moths of Europe vol. 2 Geometrid moths. N. A. P. Editions, Verriè res-le-Buisson, France; 2009. pp. 189–190.

Vellau H, Tammaru T. Larval crowding leads to unusual reaction norms for size and time at maturity in a geometrid moth (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Eur J Entomol. 2012;109: 181–186.

Sandre SL, Kaasik A, Eulitz U, Tammaru T. Phenotypic plasticity in a generalist insect herbivore with the combined use of direct and indirect cues. Oikos. 2013;122: 1626–1635.

Porter J. The colour identification guide to caterpillars of the British Isles. Penguin UK; 1997.

Sandre SL, Kaart T, Morehouse N, Tammaru T. Weak and inconsistent associations between melanic darkness and fitness-related traits in an insect. J Evol Biol. 2018; 31: 1959–1968 10.1111/jeb.13387 PubMed DOI

Vellau H, Sandre SL, Tammaru T. Effect of host species on larval growth differs between instars: The case of a geometrid moth (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Eur J Entomol. 2013;110: 599–604.

Wiklund C, Stefanescu C, Friberg M. (2017) Host plant exodus and larval wandering behaviour in a butterfly: diapause generation larvae wander for longer than non-diapause generation larvae. Ecol Entomol. 2017;42; 531–534.

Scriber JM, Slansky FJ. Nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1981;26: 183–211.

Brett MT. When is a correlation between non-independent variables “spurious”? Oikos. 2004;105: 647–656.

Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA; 1996.

SAS 9.4. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA; 2017.

Bartoń K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.40.4. 2017. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

R Core Team 2017. R 3.4.3. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: http://www.R-project.org/

Gotthard K. Increased risk of predation as a cost of high growth rate: an experimental test in a butterfly. J Anim Ecol. 2000;69: 896–902. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00432.x PubMed DOI

Stoks R, De Block M, van de Meutter F, Johansson F. Predation cost of rapid growth: behavioural coupling and physiological decoupling. J Anim Ecol. 2005;4: 708–715.

Fischer K, Zeilstra V, Hetz SK, Fiedler K. Physiological costs of growing fast: does accelerated growth reduce pay-off in adult fitness? Evol Ecol. 2004;18: 343–353.

Stoks R, De Block M, McPeek MA. Physiological costs of compensatory growth in a damselfly. Ecology 2006;87: 1566–1574. PubMed

De Block M, Stoks R. Compensatory growth and oxidative stress in a damselfly. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]. 2008;275: 781–785. PubMed PMC

De Block M, Stoks R. Short-term larval food stress and associated compensatory growth reduce adult immune function in a damselfly. Ecol Entomol. 2008;33: 796–801.

Gotthard K, Nylin S, Wiklund C. Adaptive variation in growth rate: life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Oecol.1994;99: 281–289. PubMed

Blanckenhorn WU, Fairbairn DJ. Life-history adaptation along a latitudinal cline in the water strider Aquarius remigis (Heteroptera: Gerridae). J Evol Biol. 1995; 8: 21–41.

Wiklund C, Friberg C. Seasonal development and variation in abundance among four annual flight periods in a butterfly: a 20-year study of the speckled wood (Pararge aegeria). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2011;102:635–649.

Kivelä SM, Välimäki P, Mäenpää MI. Genetic and phenotypic variation in juvenile development in relation to temperature and developmental pathway in a geometrid moth. J Evol Biol. 2012;25:881–891. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02478.x PubMed DOI

Fischer K, Fiedler K (2001) Dimorphic growth patterns and sex-specific reaction norms in the butterfly Lycaena hippothoe sumadiensis. J Evol Biol. 14: 210–218.