A previous experiment showed that there was a strong correlation between conservatism/liberalism and brain activity, linked to an error response (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) in the USA political environment. We re-ran the experiment on a larger and age-homogeneous group (n = 100, 50 females and 50 males, aged 20-26 years) in the Czech Republic; a European country with a different sociocultural environment and history. We did not find a relationship between the brain activity connected to conflict monitoring and self-reported conservatism/liberalism orientation (ρ = -0.11, p = 0.297) or conservatism/liberalism validated for the USA agenda (ρ = -0.01, p = 0.910). Instead of replicating the previous study, we decided to test the hypothesis under a different socio-cultural context. Our results support a view of self-reported or validated, conservative or liberal attitudes as a complex behavioral pattern. Such a behavioral pattern cannot be determined with statistical significance, using a simple Go-NoGo detection task, without accounting for confounding factors such as age and socio-cultural conditions. Sufficiently powered studies are warranted to evaluate this neuro-political controversy.

Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Charles University Hradec Králové Czechia

Philosophical Faculty University of Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czechia

See more in PubMed

Altemeyer B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Amodio D. M., Jost J. T., Master S. L., Yee C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1246–1247. 10.1038/nn1979 PubMed DOI

Bell D. (2014). What is liberalism? Polit. Theory 42, 682–715. 10.1177/0090591714535103 DOI

Brázdil M., Roman R., Daniel P., Rektor I. (2005). Intracerebral error-related negativity in a simple Go/NoGo task. J. Psychophysiol. 19, 244–255. 10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.244 DOI

Button K. S., Ioannidis J. P. A., Mokrysz C., Nosek B. A., Flint J., Robinson E. S. J., et al. . (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365–376. 10.1038/nrn3475 PubMed DOI

Buttrick N. R., Oishi S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 11:e12304 10.1111/spc3.12304 DOI

Cichocka A., Bilewicz M., Jost J. T., Marrouch N., Witkowska M. (2016). On the grammar of politics—or why conservatives prefer nouns. Polit. Psychol. 37, 799–815. 10.1111/pops.12327 DOI

Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 155–159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 PubMed DOI

Conover P. J., Feldman S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 25, 617–645. 10.2307/2110756 DOI

Cornelis I., Van Hiel A., Roets A., Kossowska M. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. J. Pers. 77, 51–88. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x PubMed DOI

Danigelis N. L., Hardy M., Cutler S. J. (2007). Population aging, intracohort aging, and sociopolitical attitudes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72, 812–830. 10.1177/000312240707200508 DOI

Gehring W. J., Liu Y., Orr J. M., Carp J. (2012). “The error-related negativity (ERN/Ne),” in Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components, eds Luck S. J., Kappenman E. S. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 231–291.

Gerber A. S., Huber G. A., Doherty D., Dowling C. M., Ha S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: relationships across issue domains and political contexts. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104, 111–133. 10.1017/s0003055410000031 DOI

Hunter J. D. (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: BasicBooks.

Iannaccone R., Hauser T. U., Staempfli P., Walitza S., Brandeis D., Brem S. (2015). Conflict monitoring and error processing: new insights from simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neuroimage 105, 395–407. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.028 PubMed DOI

Inglehart R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Inzlicht M., McGregor I., Hirsh J. B., Nash K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychol. Sci. 20, 385–392. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02305.x PubMed DOI

Jost J. T. (2009). Elective affinities: on the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychol. Inq. 20, 129–141. 10.1080/10478400903028599 DOI

Jost J. T., Amodio D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motiv. Emot. 36, 55–64. 10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7 DOI

Jost J. T., Krochik M., Gaucher D., Hennes E. P. (2009). Can a psychological theory of ideological differences explain contextual variability in the contents of political attitudes? Psychol. Inq. 20, 183–188. 10.1080/10478400903088908 DOI

Jost J. T., Nam H. H., Amodio D. M., Van Bavel J. J. (2014). Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Polit. Psychol. 35, 3–42. 10.1111/pops.12162 DOI

Jussim L., Crawford J. T., Anglin S. M., Stevens S. T., Duarte J. L. (2016). Interpretations and methods: towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 66, 116–133. 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003 DOI

Kluegel J. R., Smith E. R. (2017). Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of What is and What Ought to Be. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Larson M. J., Clayson P. E., Clawson A. (2014). Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 93, 283–297. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007 PubMed DOI

Lass A. (1988). Romantic documents and political monuments: the meaning-fulfillment of history in 19th-century Czech nationalism. Am. Ethnol. 15, 456–471. 10.1525/ae.1988.15.3.02a00030 DOI

Nielsen J. H. (2016). Personality and euroscepticism: the impact of personality on attitudes towards the EU. J. Common Mark. Stud. 54, 1175–1198. 10.1111/jcms.12381 DOI

Nieuwenhuis S., Ridderinkhof K. R., Talsma D., Coles M. G. H., Holroyd C. B., Kok A., et al. . (2002). A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 19–36. 10.3758/cabn.2.1.19 PubMed DOI

Olvet D. M., Hajcak G. (2009). The stability of error-related brain activity with increasing trials. Psychophysiology 46, 957–961. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00848.x PubMed DOI

R Development Core Team (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. 3503 Available online at: http://www.r-project.org [Accessed April 2, 2019].

Schreiber D. (2017). Neuropolitics: twenty years later. Politics Life Sci. 36, 114–131. 10.1017/pls.2017.25 PubMed DOI

Scruton R. (1980). The Meaning of Conservatism. London: Macmillan.

Skitka L. J., Tetlock P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 1205–1223. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1205 DOI

Soenens B., Duriez B. (2012). Does conservatism have a self-esteem enhancing function? An examination of associations with contingent self-worth and ill-being in late adults. Pers. Individ. Dif. 52, 728–732. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.037 DOI

Stanley S. K., Wilson M. S., Milfont T. L. (2017). Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Pers. Individ. Dif. 108, 174–177. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.059 DOI

Tilley J., Evans G. (2014). Ageing and generational effects on vote choice: combining cross-sectional and panel data to estimate APC effects. Elect. Stud. 33, 19–27. 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.007 DOI

van Hiel A., Brebels L. (2011). Conservatism is good for you: cultural conservatism protects self-esteem in older adults. Pers. Individ. Dif. 50, 120–123. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.002 DOI

Vittorio Caprara G., Schwartz S., Capanna C., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C. (2006). Personality and politics: values, traits and political choice. Polit. Psychol. 27, 1–28. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00457.x DOI

Weissflog M., Choma B. L., Dywan J., van Noordt S. J. R., Segalowitz S. J. (2013). The political (and physiological) divide: political orientation, performance monitoring and the anterior cingulate response. Soc. Neurosci. 8, 434–447. 10.1080/17470919.2013.833549 PubMed DOI

Weissflog M., van Noordt S. J. R., Choma B. L. (2010). Machiavellianism, sociopolitical ideology and the ERN. Psychophysiology 47 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01111.x DOI

Wendell D. G. (2016). Loyola eCommons neural correlates of political attitudes: emotion and ideology in the brain. Available online at: http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2299. [Accessed April 2, 2019]

Wilson G. D., Patterson J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 7, 264–269. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x PubMed DOI

Young adults fall for non-democratic ideology regardless of their education and political leaning: a data report from a Czech physiological study