A previous experiment showed that there was a strong correlation between conservatism/liberalism and brain activity, linked to an error response (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) in the USA political environment. We re-ran the experiment on a larger and age-homogeneous group (n = 100, 50 females and 50 males, aged 20-26 years) in the Czech Republic; a European country with a different sociocultural environment and history. We did not find a relationship between the brain activity connected to conflict monitoring and self-reported conservatism/liberalism orientation (ρ = -0.11, p = 0.297) or conservatism/liberalism validated for the USA agenda (ρ = -0.01, p = 0.910). Instead of replicating the previous study, we decided to test the hypothesis under a different socio-cultural context. Our results support a view of self-reported or validated, conservative or liberal attitudes as a complex behavioral pattern. Such a behavioral pattern cannot be determined with statistical significance, using a simple Go-NoGo detection task, without accounting for confounding factors such as age and socio-cultural conditions. Sufficiently powered studies are warranted to evaluate this neuro-political controversy.

Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Charles University Hradec Králové Czechia

Philosophical Faculty University of Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Altemeyer B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Amodio D. M., Jost J. T., Master S. L., Yee C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1246–1247. 10.1038/nn1979 PubMed DOI

Bell D. (2014). What is liberalism? Polit. Theory 42, 682–715. 10.1177/0090591714535103 DOI

Brázdil M., Roman R., Daniel P., Rektor I. (2005). Intracerebral error-related negativity in a simple Go/NoGo task. J. Psychophysiol. 19, 244–255. 10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.244 DOI

Button K. S., Ioannidis J. P. A., Mokrysz C., Nosek B. A., Flint J., Robinson E. S. J., et al. . (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365–376. 10.1038/nrn3475 PubMed DOI

Buttrick N. R., Oishi S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 11:e12304 10.1111/spc3.12304 DOI

Cichocka A., Bilewicz M., Jost J. T., Marrouch N., Witkowska M. (2016). On the grammar of politics—or why conservatives prefer nouns. Polit. Psychol. 37, 799–815. 10.1111/pops.12327 DOI

Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 155–159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 PubMed DOI

Conover P. J., Feldman S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 25, 617–645. 10.2307/2110756 DOI

Cornelis I., Van Hiel A., Roets A., Kossowska M. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. J. Pers. 77, 51–88. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x PubMed DOI

Danigelis N. L., Hardy M., Cutler S. J. (2007). Population aging, intracohort aging, and sociopolitical attitudes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72, 812–830. 10.1177/000312240707200508 DOI

Gehring W. J., Liu Y., Orr J. M., Carp J. (2012). “The error-related negativity (ERN/Ne),” in Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components, eds Luck S. J., Kappenman E. S. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 231–291.

Gerber A. S., Huber G. A., Doherty D., Dowling C. M., Ha S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: relationships across issue domains and political contexts. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104, 111–133. 10.1017/s0003055410000031 DOI

Hunter J. D. (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: BasicBooks.

Iannaccone R., Hauser T. U., Staempfli P., Walitza S., Brandeis D., Brem S. (2015). Conflict monitoring and error processing: new insights from simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neuroimage 105, 395–407. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.028 PubMed DOI

Inglehart R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Inzlicht M., McGregor I., Hirsh J. B., Nash K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychol. Sci. 20, 385–392. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02305.x PubMed DOI

Jost J. T. (2009). Elective affinities: on the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychol. Inq. 20, 129–141. 10.1080/10478400903028599 DOI

Jost J. T., Amodio D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motiv. Emot. 36, 55–64. 10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7 DOI

Jost J. T., Krochik M., Gaucher D., Hennes E. P. (2009). Can a psychological theory of ideological differences explain contextual variability in the contents of political attitudes? Psychol. Inq. 20, 183–188. 10.1080/10478400903088908 DOI

Jost J. T., Nam H. H., Amodio D. M., Van Bavel J. J. (2014). Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Polit. Psychol. 35, 3–42. 10.1111/pops.12162 DOI

Jussim L., Crawford J. T., Anglin S. M., Stevens S. T., Duarte J. L. (2016). Interpretations and methods: towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 66, 116–133. 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003 DOI

Kluegel J. R., Smith E. R. (2017). Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of What is and What Ought to Be. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Larson M. J., Clayson P. E., Clawson A. (2014). Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 93, 283–297. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007 PubMed DOI

Lass A. (1988). Romantic documents and political monuments: the meaning-fulfillment of history in 19th-century Czech nationalism. Am. Ethnol. 15, 456–471. 10.1525/ae.1988.15.3.02a00030 DOI

Nielsen J. H. (2016). Personality and euroscepticism: the impact of personality on attitudes towards the EU. J. Common Mark. Stud. 54, 1175–1198. 10.1111/jcms.12381 DOI

Nieuwenhuis S., Ridderinkhof K. R., Talsma D., Coles M. G. H., Holroyd C. B., Kok A., et al. . (2002). A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 19–36. 10.3758/cabn.2.1.19 PubMed DOI

Olvet D. M., Hajcak G. (2009). The stability of error-related brain activity with increasing trials. Psychophysiology 46, 957–961. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00848.x PubMed DOI

R Development Core Team (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. 3503 Available online at: http://www.r-project.org [Accessed April 2, 2019].

Schreiber D. (2017). Neuropolitics: twenty years later. Politics Life Sci. 36, 114–131. 10.1017/pls.2017.25 PubMed DOI

Scruton R. (1980). The Meaning of Conservatism. London: Macmillan.

Skitka L. J., Tetlock P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 1205–1223. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1205 DOI

Soenens B., Duriez B. (2012). Does conservatism have a self-esteem enhancing function? An examination of associations with contingent self-worth and ill-being in late adults. Pers. Individ. Dif. 52, 728–732. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.037 DOI

Stanley S. K., Wilson M. S., Milfont T. L. (2017). Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Pers. Individ. Dif. 108, 174–177. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.059 DOI

Tilley J., Evans G. (2014). Ageing and generational effects on vote choice: combining cross-sectional and panel data to estimate APC effects. Elect. Stud. 33, 19–27. 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.007 DOI

van Hiel A., Brebels L. (2011). Conservatism is good for you: cultural conservatism protects self-esteem in older adults. Pers. Individ. Dif. 50, 120–123. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.002 DOI

Vittorio Caprara G., Schwartz S., Capanna C., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C. (2006). Personality and politics: values, traits and political choice. Polit. Psychol. 27, 1–28. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00457.x DOI

Weissflog M., Choma B. L., Dywan J., van Noordt S. J. R., Segalowitz S. J. (2013). The political (and physiological) divide: political orientation, performance monitoring and the anterior cingulate response. Soc. Neurosci. 8, 434–447. 10.1080/17470919.2013.833549 PubMed DOI

Weissflog M., van Noordt S. J. R., Choma B. L. (2010). Machiavellianism, sociopolitical ideology and the ERN. Psychophysiology 47 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01111.x DOI

Wendell D. G. (2016). Loyola eCommons neural correlates of political attitudes: emotion and ideology in the brain. Available online at: http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2299. [Accessed April 2, 2019]

Wilson G. D., Patterson J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 7, 264–269. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x PubMed DOI

Young adults fall for non-democratic ideology regardless of their education and political leaning: a data report from a Czech physiological study