Lactococcus lactis is a food-grade lactic acid bacterium that is used in the dairy industry as a cell factory and as a host for recombinant protein expression. The nisin-controlled inducible expression (NICE) system is frequently applied in L. lactis; however new tools for its genetic modification are highly desirable. In this work NICE was adapted for dual protein expression. Plasmid pNZDual, that contains two nisin promoters and multiple cloning sites (MCSs), and pNZPolycist, that contains a single nisin promoter and two MCSs separated by the ribosome binding site, were constructed. Genes for the infrared fluorescent protein and for the human IgG-binding DARPin were cloned in all possible combinations to assess the protein yield. The dual promoter plasmid pNZDual enabled balanced expression of the two model proteins. It was exploited for the development of a single-plasmid inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system (pNZCRISPR) by using a nisin promoter, first to drive Cas9 expression and, secondly, to drive single guide RNA transcription. sgRNAs against htrA and ermR directed Cas9 against genomic or plasmid DNA and caused changes in bacterial growth and survival. Replacing Cas9 by dCas9 enabled CRISPR interference-mediated silencing of the upp gene. The present study introduces a new series of plasmids for advanced genetic modification of lactic acid bacterium L. lactis.

Department of Biotechnology Jožef Stefan Institute Jamova 39 SI 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia

Faculty of Pharmacy Charles University Prague 500 05 Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Faculty of Pharmacy University of Ljubljana Aškerčeva 7 SI 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia

Graduate School of Biomedicine Faculty of Medicine University of Ljubljana SI 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Laroute, V. et al. From genome to phenotype: An integrative approach to evaluate the biodiversity of Lactococcus lactis. Microorganisms5, doi:10.3390/microorganisms5020027 (2017). PubMed PMC

Song AA, In LL, Lim SH, Rahim RA. A review on Lactococcus lactis: from food to factory. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0669-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Ballal SA, et al. Host lysozyme-mediated lysis of Lactococcus lactis facilitates delivery of colitis-attenuating superoxide dismutase to inflamed colons. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:7803–7808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501897112. PubMed DOI PMC

Berlec A, Ravnikar M, Strukelj B. Lactic acid bacteria as oral delivery systems for biomolecules. Die Pharmazie. 2012;67:891–898. PubMed

de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM. Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1996;62:3662–3667. PubMed PMC

Kuipers OP, de Ruyter PGGA, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM. Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 1998;64:15–21. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00100-X. DOI

Mierau I, Kleerebezem M. 10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005;68:705–717. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0107-6. PubMed DOI

Chen H, Huang R, Zhang YP. Systematic comparison of co-expression of multiple recombinant thermophilic enzymes in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101:4481–4493. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8206-8. PubMed DOI

Kim KJ, et al. Two-promoter vector is highly efficient for overproduction of protein complexes. Protein Sci. 2004;13:1698–1703. doi: 10.1110/ps.04644504. PubMed DOI PMC

Tan S. A modular polycistronic expression system for overexpressing protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Protein Expres. Purif. 2001;21:224–234. doi: 10.1006/prep.2000.1363. PubMed DOI

Tolia NH, Joshua-Tor L. Strategies for protein coexpression in Escherichia coli. Nat. Methods. 2006;3:55–64. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0106-55. PubMed DOI

Barrangou R, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315:1709–1712. doi: 10.1126/science.1138140. PubMed DOI

Choi KR, Lee SY. CRISPR technologies for bacterial systems: Current achievements and future directions. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016;34:1180–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.002. PubMed DOI

Selle K, Barrangou R. Harnessing CRISPR-Cas systems for bacterial genome editing. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.008. PubMed DOI

Jakociunas T, Jensen MK, Keasling JD. CRISPR/Cas9 advances engineering of microbial cell factories. Metab. Eng. 2016;34:44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.003. PubMed DOI

Luo ML, Leenay RT, Beisel CL. Current and future prospects for CRISPR-based tools in bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113:930–943. doi: 10.1002/bit.25851. PubMed DOI PMC

Schwartz C, Frogue K, Ramesh A, Misa J, Wheeldon I. CRISPRi repression of nonhomologous end-joining for enhanced genome engineering via homologous recombination in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114:2896–2906. doi: 10.1002/bit.26404. PubMed DOI

Cobb RE, Wang Y, Zhao H. High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of Streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR/Cas system. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015;4:723–728. doi: 10.1021/sb500351f. PubMed DOI PMC

Wu, M. Y., Sung, L. Y., Li, H., Huang, C. H. & Hu, Y. C. Combining CRISPR and CRISPRi systems for metabolic engineering of E. coli and 1,4-BDOBiosynthesis. ACS Synth. Biol., doi:10.1021/acssynbio.7b00251 (2017). PubMed

Oh JH, van Pijkeren JP. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e131. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku623. PubMed DOI PMC

Lemay, M. L., Tremblay, D. M. & Moineau, S. Genome engineering of virulent lactococcal phages using CRISPR-Cas9. ACS Synth. Biol., doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00388 (2017). PubMed

Filonov GS, et al. Bright and stable near-infrared fluorescent protein for in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:757–761. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1918. PubMed DOI PMC

Steiner D, Forrer P, Pluckthun A. Efficient selection of DARPins with sub-nanomolar affinities using SRP phage display. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;382:1211–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.085. PubMed DOI

Zadravec P, Strukelj B, Berlec A. Improvement of LysM-mediated surface display of designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) in recombinant and nonrecombinant strains of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:2098–2106. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03694-14. PubMed DOI PMC

de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, Beerthuyzen MM, van Alen-Boerrigter I, de Vos WM. Functional analysis of promoters in the nisin gene cluster of Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 1996;178:3434–3439. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.12.3434-3439.1996. PubMed DOI PMC

Perez-Arellano I, Zuniga M, Perez-Martinez G. Construction of compatible wide-host-range shuttle vectors for lactic acid bacteria and Escherichia coli. Plasmid. 2001;46:106–116. doi: 10.1006/plas.2001.1531. PubMed DOI

Berlec A, Zavrsnik J, Butinar M, Turk B, Strukelj B. In vivo imaging of Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum and Escherichia coli expressing infrared fluorescent protein in mice. Microb. Cell Fact. 2015;14:181. doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0376-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Dieye Y, Usai S, Clier F, Gruss A, Piard JC. Design of a protein-targeting system for lactic acid bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:4157–4166. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4157-4166.2001. PubMed DOI PMC

Steen A, et al. Cell wall attachment of a widely distributed peptidoglycan binding domain is hindered by cell wall constituents. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:23874–23881. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211055200. PubMed DOI

Skrlec K, Strukelj B, Berlec A. Non-immunoglobulin scaffolds: a focus on their targets. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.012. PubMed DOI

Jinek M, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829. PubMed DOI PMC

Li B, Qiu Y, Shi H, Yin H. The importance of lag time extension in determining bacterial resistance to antibiotics. The Analyst. 2016;141:3059–3067. doi: 10.1039/C5AN02649K. PubMed DOI

Qi LS, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell. 2013;152:1173–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022. PubMed DOI PMC

Martinussen J, Hammer K. Powerful methods to establish chromosomal markers in Lactococcus lactis: an analysis of pyrimidine salvage pathway mutants obtained by positive selections. Microbiology. 1995;141(Pt 8):1883–1890. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-8-1883. PubMed DOI

Song L, et al. Construction of upp deletion mutant strains of Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis based on counterselective system using temperature-sensitive plasmid. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2014;102:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.04.011. PubMed DOI

Kimmel SA, Roberts RF. Development of a growth medium suitable for exopolysaccharide production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus RR. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998;40:87–92. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00023-3. PubMed DOI

Xu T, et al. Efficient genome editing in Clostridium cellulolyticum via CRISPR-Cas9 nickase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:4423–4431. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00873-15. PubMed DOI PMC

Baranyi J, Roberts TA. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994;23:277–294. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0. PubMed DOI

Herigstad B, Hamilton M, Heersink J. How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2001;44:121–129. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00241-4. PubMed DOI

Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R19. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19. PubMed DOI PMC