Psychological treatment of problematic sexual interests: cross-country comparison
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords
- Psychotherapy, cross-cultural, paraphilia, problematic sexual interest, sexual offence, treatment,
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Paraphilic Disorders prevention & control therapy MeSH
- Psychotherapy * MeSH
- Cross-Cultural Comparison * MeSH
- Criminals legislation & jurisprudence psychology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- North America MeSH
- United Kingdom MeSH
This paper reviews the use of psychotherapeutic approaches to treat individuals who have committed sex crimes and/or have problematic sexual interests (PSI); including types of psychotherapy used, descriptions of preventive and reintegration programmes, and highlighting specific theoretical controversies. In the second part, experts from Canada, the Czech Republic, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, who participated in an International Consensus Meeting held in Prague (2017), summarize treatment programmes in their countries. The comparison revealed some general findings: each country has variability between its own programmes; most countries have different programmes for people who are in custody and who are in the community; the state-directed treatment programmes are primarily focused on criminal individuals, while non-criminal individuals are treated in preventive programmes and/or in special clinics or are untreated; the presence of PSI in patients is acknowledged in most programmes, although specific programmes exclusively for individuals with PSI rarely exist. Studies on effectiveness are difficult to compare due to methodologic, political, and cultural differences. Further communication between more countries to share knowledge about successful treatments and preventive approaches is needed, especially enhanced international collaboration between researchers and clinicians to verify the effectiveness of current clinical and experimental program, rs.
b Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Bishop Grosseteste University Lincoln UK
e San Francisco Forensic Institute San Francisco CA USA
f Institute of Sexology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
g Sexual Behaviours Clinic The Royal and University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada
References provided by Crossref.org