Reimbursement Legislations and Decision Making for Orphan Drugs in Central and Eastern European Countries
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31139080
PubMed Central
PMC6518361
DOI
10.3389/fphar.2019.00487
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Central and East Europe, European Medicine Agency, conditional approval, exceptional circumstances, kappa coefficient of agreement, marketing authorisation, orphan drug, reimbursement policy,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Reimbursement policies influence access of patients to orphan drugs in the European countries. OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive description of orphan drug reimbursement policies and to assess reimbursement decision-making process in the EU-CEE countries as well as the impact of the type of approval and disease on reimbursement decisions. METHODS: For each drug, the information regarding conditional approval or approval under exceptional circumstances was obtained from the EMA website. The reimbursement status for analyzed drugs was collected in a questionnaire survey performed in a group of experts in reimbursement policy. The agreement between countries was assessed using the κ coefficient, nominal variables tests were compared using the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test. The impact of the EMA's conditional approval and approval under exceptional circumstances was assessed using logistic regression and presented as an odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: The analysis revealed that most orphan drugs were authorized for the treatment of oncological or metabolic diseases [36 drugs (38%) and 22 drugs (23%), respectively]. The shares of reimbursed orphan drugs varied significantly (p = 0.0031) from 6.3% in Latvia to 27.4% in Poland. No correlation (r = 0.02; p = 0.9583) with GDP per capita was observed. The highest agreement in reimbursement decisions was observed between Estonia and Lithuania, and the lowest - between Estonia and Latvia, with kappa of 0.69 and 0.11, respectively. Significant impact of the type of approval and reimbursement status was observed for Czechia, Lithuania and Slovakia where conditional approval and exceptional circumstances negatively influenced reimbursement decision. Type of disease has significant influence on reimbursement decision in 4 out of 10 analyzed countries with significant outweigh of positive decisions for oncological diseases. CONCLUSION: In considered countries specific regulations on reimbursement of orphan drugs are valid but in Lithuania and Romania no formal HTA process was employed; in case of some countries higher ICER values for orphans are used. The share of reimbursed orphan drugs varied significantly across the countries, but it was not associated with GDP per capita.
Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia Zagreb Croatia
Department of Biotechnology University of Rijeka Rijeka Croatia
Department of Pharmacoeconomics Institute of Mother and Child Warsaw Poland
Faculty of Pharmacy Medical University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria
Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicinal Products Sofia Bulgaria
National Institute of Health Insurance Fund Management Budapest Hungary
Pricing and Reimbursement Regulation Branch State Institute for Drug Control Prague Czechia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Czech M., Baran-Kooiker A., Holownia-Voloskova M., Kooiker C., Sykut-Cegielska J. (2018). Bridging East with West of Europe – a comparison of orphan drugs policies in Poland, Russia and the Netherlands.
European Commission (2006).
European Commission (2019).
European Medicines Agency (2018a).
European Medicines Agency (2018b).
European Medicines Agency (2007).
Gammie T., Lu C. Y., Babar Z. U. (2015). Access to orphan drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 Countries. PubMed DOI PMC
Iskrov G., Miteva-Katrandzhieva T., Stefanov R. (2012). Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: the case of Bulgaria. PubMed DOI
Iskrov G. G., Raycheva R. D., Stefanov R. S. (2013). Insight into reimbursement decision-making criteria in Bulgaria: implications for orphan drugs. PubMed
Jakovljevic M., Lazarevic M., Milovanovic O., Kanjevac T. (2016). The new and old Europe: East-West split in pharmaceutical spending. PubMed DOI PMC
Jakovljevic M., Yamada T. (eds) (2017). PubMed PMC
Kamusheva M., Manova M., Savova A. T., Petrova G. I., Mitov K., Harsányi A., et al. (2018). Comparative analysis of legislative requirements about patients’ access to biotechnological drugs for rare diseases in Central and Eastern European Countries. PubMed DOI PMC
Logviss K., Krievins D., Purvina S. (2014). Rare diseases and orphan drugs: latvian story. PubMed DOI PMC
Malinowski K. P., Kawalec P., Trabka W., Sowada C., Pilc A. (2018). Reimbursement of orphan drugs in Europe in relation to the type of authorization by the European medicines agency and the decision making based on health technology assessment. PubMed DOI PMC
Ministry of Health (2019).
Pavlović N., Stanimirov B., Stojanèević M., Paut-Kusturica M., Stoimenova A., Goloèorbin-Kon S., et al. (2012). An insight on differences in availability and reimbursement of orphan medicines among Serbia, Bulgaria and Sweden. DOI
Picavet E., Annemans L., Cleemput I., Cassiman D., Simoens S. (2012). Market uptake of orphan drugs–a European analysis. PubMed DOI
Szegedi M., Zelei T., Arickx F., Bucsics A., Cohn-Zanchetta E., Fürst J., et al. (2018). The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products. PubMed DOI PMC
Viera A. J., Garrett J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. PubMed
Winstone J., Chadda S., Ralston S., Sajosi P. (2015). Review and comparison of clinical evidence submitted to support European medicines agency market authorization of orphan-designated. PubMed DOI PMC
Zelei T., Molnár M. J., Szegedi M., Kaló Z. (2016). Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries. PubMed DOI PMC
Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs