BACKGROUND: Reimbursement policies influence access of patients to orphan drugs in the European countries. OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive description of orphan drug reimbursement policies and to assess reimbursement decision-making process in the EU-CEE countries as well as the impact of the type of approval and disease on reimbursement decisions. METHODS: For each drug, the information regarding conditional approval or approval under exceptional circumstances was obtained from the EMA website. The reimbursement status for analyzed drugs was collected in a questionnaire survey performed in a group of experts in reimbursement policy. The agreement between countries was assessed using the κ coefficient, nominal variables tests were compared using the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test. The impact of the EMA's conditional approval and approval under exceptional circumstances was assessed using logistic regression and presented as an odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: The analysis revealed that most orphan drugs were authorized for the treatment of oncological or metabolic diseases [36 drugs (38%) and 22 drugs (23%), respectively]. The shares of reimbursed orphan drugs varied significantly (p = 0.0031) from 6.3% in Latvia to 27.4% in Poland. No correlation (r = 0.02; p = 0.9583) with GDP per capita was observed. The highest agreement in reimbursement decisions was observed between Estonia and Lithuania, and the lowest - between Estonia and Latvia, with kappa of 0.69 and 0.11, respectively. Significant impact of the type of approval and reimbursement status was observed for Czechia, Lithuania and Slovakia where conditional approval and exceptional circumstances negatively influenced reimbursement decision. Type of disease has significant influence on reimbursement decision in 4 out of 10 analyzed countries with significant outweigh of positive decisions for oncological diseases. CONCLUSION: In considered countries specific regulations on reimbursement of orphan drugs are valid but in Lithuania and Romania no formal HTA process was employed; in case of some countries higher ICER values for orphans are used. The share of reimbursed orphan drugs varied significantly across the countries, but it was not associated with GDP per capita.

Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia Zagreb Croatia

Bioinformatics and Public Health Department Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University Kraków Poland

Department of Biotechnology University of Rijeka Rijeka Croatia

Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia

Department of Pathology Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania

Department of Pharmacoeconomics Institute of Mother and Child Warsaw Poland

Faculty of Pharmacy Medical University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria

Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

Institute of Public Health Faculty of Health Sciences Jagiellonian University Medical College Kraków Poland

National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicinal Products Sofia Bulgaria

National Institute of Health Insurance Fund Management Budapest Hungary

Pricing and Reimbursement Regulation Branch State Institute for Drug Control Prague Czechia

The National Health Service Riga Latvia

Titu Maiorescu University Bucharest Romania

See more in PubMed

Czech M., Baran-Kooiker A., Holownia-Voloskova M., Kooiker C., Sykut-Cegielska J. (2018). Bridging East with West of Europe – a comparison of orphan drugs policies in Poland, Russia and the Netherlands. Acta Pol. Pharm. Drug Res. 75 1409–1422.

European Commission (2006). Commission Regulation (Ec) No 507/2006 of 29 March 2006 on the Conditional Marketing Authorisation for Medicinal Products for Human Use Falling within the Scope of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/reg_2006_507/reg_2006_507_en.pdf (accessed November 20, 2018).

European Commission (2019). The Burden of Healthcare on Households’ Budgets. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20190219-1?fbclid = IwAR1hFC33WqT4FE93RhXxfHjd7BLcCn9galpeQbejyOO-tcj2wvY9G6xflOo (accessed March 31, 2019).

European Medicines Agency (2018a). European Medicines Agency Pre-Authorisation Procedural Advice for Users of the Centralised Procedure. EMA/821278/2015. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/european-medicines-agency-pre-authorisation-procedural-advice-users-centralised-procedure_en-0.pdf (accessed January 12, 2018)

European Medicines Agency (2018b). Meeting Highlights from the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) 8-11 April 2019. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ (accessed November 20, 2018)

European Medicines Agency (2007). Orphan Drugs and Rare Diseases at a Glance. EMEA/290072/2007. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2010/01/WC500069805.pdf (accessed January 12, 2018)

Gammie T., Lu C. Y., Babar Z. U. (2015). Access to orphan drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 Countries. PLoS One 10:e0140002. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140002 PubMed DOI PMC

Iskrov G., Miteva-Katrandzhieva T., Stefanov R. (2012). Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: the case of Bulgaria. Health Policy 108 10–18. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.013 PubMed DOI

Iskrov G. G., Raycheva R. D., Stefanov R. S. (2013). Insight into reimbursement decision-making criteria in Bulgaria: implications for orphan drugs. Folia Med. 55 80–86. PubMed

Jakovljevic M., Lazarevic M., Milovanovic O., Kanjevac T. (2016). The new and old Europe: East-West split in pharmaceutical spending. Front. Pharmacol. 7:18. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00018 PubMed DOI PMC

Jakovljevic M., Yamada T. (eds) (2017). Role of Health Economic Data in Policy Making and Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies. Lausanne: Frontiers Media. PubMed PMC

Kamusheva M., Manova M., Savova A. T., Petrova G. I., Mitov K., Harsányi A., et al. (2018). Comparative analysis of legislative requirements about patients’ access to biotechnological drugs for rare diseases in Central and Eastern European Countries. Front. Pharmacol. 9:795 10.3389/fphar.2018.00795 PubMed DOI PMC

Logviss K., Krievins D., Purvina S. (2014). Rare diseases and orphan drugs: latvian story. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 9:147. 10.1186/s13023-014-0147-z PubMed DOI PMC

Malinowski K. P., Kawalec P., Trabka W., Sowada C., Pilc A. (2018). Reimbursement of orphan drugs in Europe in relation to the type of authorization by the European medicines agency and the decision making based on health technology assessment. Front. Pharmacol. 9:1263. 10.3389/fphar.2018.01263 PubMed DOI PMC

Ministry of Health (2019). National Medicines Policy 2018-2022. Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/rada-ministrow-przyjela-dokument-polityka-lekowa-panstwa-20182022 (accessed January 26, 2019).

Pavlović N., Stanimirov B., Stojanèević M., Paut-Kusturica M., Stoimenova A., Goloèorbin-Kon S., et al. (2012). An insight on differences in availability and reimbursement of orphan medicines among Serbia, Bulgaria and Sweden. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Eq. 26 3236–3241. 10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0085 DOI

Picavet E., Annemans L., Cleemput I., Cassiman D., Simoens S. (2012). Market uptake of orphan drugs–a European analysis. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 37 664–667. 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01364.x PubMed DOI

Szegedi M., Zelei T., Arickx F., Bucsics A., Cohn-Zanchetta E., Fürst J., et al. (2018). The European challenges of funding orphan medicinal products. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 13:184. 10.1186/s13023-018-0927-y PubMed DOI PMC

Viera A. J., Garrett J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam. Med. 37 360–363. PubMed

Winstone J., Chadda S., Ralston S., Sajosi P. (2015). Review and comparison of clinical evidence submitted to support European medicines agency market authorization of orphan-designated. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 10:139. 10.1186/s13023-015-0349-z PubMed DOI PMC

Zelei T., Molnár M. J., Szegedi M., Kaló Z. (2016). Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 11:72. 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Clinical aspects of reimbursement policies for orphan drugs in Central and Eastern European countries

COVID-19 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter analysis by the Czech CLL study group

Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs

Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe