Trial protocol for the validation of the 'Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life (TASQ) Questionnaire' in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the TASQ registry
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
31218003
PubMed Central
PMC6546188
DOI
10.1136/openhrt-2019-001008
PII: openhrt-2019-001008
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement, quality of life, questionnaire, transcatheter,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) have a reduced life expectancy and quality of life (QoL), owing to advanced age and the presence of multiple comorbidities. Currently, there is no AS-specific QoL measurement tool, which prevents an accurate assessment of how this chronic condition and its treatment affect patients. The Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) was developed in order to address this deficiency. METHODS: The present trial protocol was designed to enable validation of the TASQ, which has been produced in five languages (English, French, German, Italian and Spanish) to increase usability. Patients with severe AS who are undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) will be asked to complete the TASQ and, for comparative purposes, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and the general health-related QoL Short Form-12 questionnaire. The questionnaires will be completed prior to the intervention, at discharge, as well as at 30 days and 3 months follow-up. A total of 290 patients will be recruited across one Canadian and nine European centres. Overall, the protocol validation aims to include 120 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI), 120 undergoing SAVR and up to 50 being treated medically. The primary objective of the registry is to validate the TASQ in five different languages. The secondary objective is to assess the utility of the TASQ for assessing differences in QoL outcome between patients undergoing TF-TAVI, SAVR or medical management for their AS. DISCUSSION: Validation and roll-out of the TASQ will enable clinicians to capture an accurate assessment of how AS and its management affects the QoL of patients and will help them to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for individual patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03186339.
Department of Cardiology Barts Heart Centre St Bartholomew's Hospital London London UK
Department of Cardiology Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital Paris France
Department of Cardiology Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Juan Canalejo Coruña Spain
Department of Cardiology Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
Department of Psychiatry University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada
Departmentof Cardiac Surgery Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Departmentof Internal Medicine 3 partner site Hamburg Kiel Lübeck Kiel Germany
Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Verona Verona Italy
Edwards Lifesciences Nyon Switzerland
Edwards Lifesciences Prague Czech Republic
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine Cloppenburg Germany
See more in PubMed
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. . 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391 PubMed DOI
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. . Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2010;363:1597–607. 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232 PubMed DOI
Bonaros N, Petzina R, Cocchieri R, et al. . Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a first-line choice or as a last resort? An analysis based on the route registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:919–26. 10.1093/ejcts/ezw406 PubMed DOI
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Lei Y, et al. . How to define a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conceptual framework and empirical observations from the placement of aortic transcatheter valve (partner) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013;6:591–7. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000354 PubMed DOI PMC
Kundi H, Strom JB, Valsdottir LR, et al. . Trends in Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement According to Hospital-Based Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Volumes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:2148–56. 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.002 PubMed DOI
Lancellotti P, Magne J, Dulgheru R, et al. . Outcomes of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3152 PubMed DOI PMC
Shi S, Afilalo J, Lipsitz LA, et al. . Frailty phenotype and deficit accumulation frailty index in predicting recovery after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A 2018;62 10.1093/gerona/gly196 PubMed DOI PMC
Devins GM. Using the illness intrusiveness ratings scale to understand health-related quality of life in chronic disease. J Psychosom Res 2010;68:591–602. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.05.006 PubMed DOI
Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, et al. . Development and evaluation of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1245–55. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3 PubMed DOI
Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. . Development and evaluation of the Seattle angina questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:333–41. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9 PubMed DOI
Rector TS, Cohn JN. Assessment of patient outcome with The Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. pimobendan multicenter Research Group. Am Heart J 1992;124:1017–25. 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90986-6 PubMed DOI
Dixon T, Lim LLY, Oldridge NB. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life Instrument: reference data for users. Qual Life Res 2002;11:173–83. 10.1023/A:1015005109731 PubMed DOI
Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33. PubMed
EuroQol Group EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 PubMed DOI
Arnold SV, Reynolds MR, Wang K, et al. . Health status after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk: results from the CoreValve us pivotal trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:1207–17. 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.018 PubMed DOI PMC
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Lei Y, et al. . Use of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire for monitoring health status in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6:61–7. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.970053 PubMed DOI
Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Vemulapalli S, et al. . Quality-of-life outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an unselected population: a report from the STS/ACC transcatheter valve therapy registry. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:409–16. 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5302 PubMed DOI PMC
Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Scale (TASQ) Development and psychometric quality of life properties in TAVI patients. Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Scale, 2017.
Folkmann S, Gorlitzer M, Weiss G, et al. . Quality-of-life in octogenarians one year after aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;11:750–3. 10.1510/icvts.2010.240085 PubMed DOI
Oliveira SM, Correia AS, Paiva M, et al. . Long-term survival, autonomy, and quality of life of elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2012;27:20–3. 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01360.x PubMed DOI
Biermann J, Horack M, Kahlert P, et al. . The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on quality of life: results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. Clin Res Cardiol 2015;104:877–86. 10.1007/s00392-015-0857-9 PubMed DOI
Bona V, Khawaja MZ, Bapat V, et al. . Early and late changes in quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the transfemoral and transapical approaches. EuroIntervention 2015;11:221–9. 10.4244/EIJV11I2A41 PubMed DOI
Fairbairn TA, Meads DM, Mather AN, et al. . Serial change in health-related quality of life over 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictors of health outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1672–80. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.035 PubMed DOI
Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Wang K, et al. . Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the partner (placement of aortic transcatheter valve) trial (cohort a). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:548–58. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.075 PubMed DOI
Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, et al. . Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2011;124:1964–72. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.040022 PubMed DOI
Díez-Villanueva P, Salamanca J, Rojas A, et al. . Importance of frailty and comorbidity in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Geriatr Cardiol 2017;14:379–82. 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.06.005 PubMed DOI PMC
Aortic valve replacement: validation of the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03186339