Revisiting the "fallacy of averages" in ecology: Expected gain per unit time equals expected gain divided by expected time
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
31491495
DOI
10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.109993
PII: S0022-5193(19)30341-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Diet choice model, Fallacy of averages, Functional response, Hamilton’s rule, Prisoner’s dilemma game,
- MeSH
- Models, Biological * MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Diet MeSH
- Ecology * MeSH
- Feeding Behavior MeSH
- Game Theory MeSH
- Choice Behavior MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Fitness is often defined as the average payoff an animal obtains when it is engaged in several activities, each taking some time. We point out that the average can be calculated with respect to either the time distribution, or to the event distribution of these activities. We show that these two averages lead to the same fitness function. We illustrate this result through two examples from foraging theory, Holling II functional response and the diet choice model, and one game-theoretic example of Hamilton's rule applied to the time-constrained Prisoner's dilemma (PD). In particular, we show that in these models, fitness defined as expected gain per unit time equals fitness defined as expected gain divided by expected time. We also show how these fitnesses predict the optimal outcome for diet choice and the prevalence of cooperation in the repeated PD game.
Department of Mathematics City University of London London UK
Department of Mathematics Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo Ontario Canada
References provided by Crossref.org