Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
29035
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
PubMed
31534192
PubMed Central
PMC6995780
DOI
10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0
PII: 10.1038/s41409-019-0676-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- benzylaminy MeSH
- cyklamy MeSH
- heterocyklické sloučeniny * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * terapie MeSH
- mobilizace hematopoetických kmenových buněk MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- benzylaminy MeSH
- cyklamy MeSH
- heterocyklické sloučeniny * MeSH
- plerixafor MeSH Prohlížeč
Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventional registry study (NCT01362972), evaluated long-term outcomes for MM patients who received plerixafor versus other mobilization regimens. The comparisons were: G-CSF + plerixafor (G-CSF + P) versus G-CSF-; G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G-CSF + C); and G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after transplantation. After propensity matching, 77 versus 41 patients in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF cohorts, 129 versus 129 in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + C cohorts, and 117 versus 117 in the G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C cohorts were matched, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in a smaller sample size and imbalances were not completely overcome. For both PFS and OS, the upper limits of the hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals exceeded prespecified boundaries; noninferiority was not demonstrated. CIR rates were higher in the plerixafor cohorts. G-CSF + P remains an option for the mobilization of HSCs in poor mobilizers with MM with no substantial differences in PFS, OS, and CIR in comparison with other regimens.
Charles University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Leiden The Netherlands
Hospital Saint Antoine Paris France
Imperial College London London UK
Institut Paoli Calmettes Marseille France
Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Nottingham University Nottingham UK
Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Skanes University Hospital Lund Sweden
St James Hospital Dublin Ireland
University Hospital Hamburg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
DiPersio JF, Uy GL, Yasothan U, Kirkpatrick P. Plerixafor. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:105–6. doi: 10.1038/nrd2819. PubMed DOI
Nervi B, Link DC, DiPersio JF. Cytokines and hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. J Cell Biochem. 2006;99:690–705. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21043. PubMed DOI
Fruehauf S, Seeger T. New strategies for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells. Future Oncol. 2005;1:375–83. doi: 10.1517/14796694.1.3.375. PubMed DOI
Lapidot T, Dar A, Kollet O. How do stem cells find their way home? Blood. 2005;106:1901–10. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1417. PubMed DOI
Pirracchio R, Resche-Rigon M, Chevret S. Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-70. PubMed DOI PMC
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452. DOI
Brioli A, Perrone G, Patriarca F, Pezzi A, Nobile F, Ballerini F, et al. Successful mobilization of PBSCs predicts favorable outcomes in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents and autologous transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2015;50:673–8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.322. PubMed DOI
Shah N, Callander N, Ganguly S, Gul Z, Hamadani M, Costa L, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:1155–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.03.002. PubMed DOI
Lee KH, Jung SK, Kim SJ, Jang JH, Kim K, Kim WS, et al. Incidence and risk factors of poor mobilization in adult autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a single-centre experience. Vox Sang. 2014;107:407–15. doi: 10.1111/vox.12183. PubMed DOI
Sancho JM, Morgades M, Grifols JR, Junca J, Guardia R, Vives S, et al. Predictive factors for poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and peak CD34(+) cell count to guide pre-emptive or immediate rescue mobilization. Cytotherapy. 2012;14:823–9. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2012.681042. PubMed DOI
Wuchter P, Ran D, Bruckner T, Schmitt T, Witzens-Harig M, Neben K, et al. Poor mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells-definitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2010;16:490–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.012. PubMed DOI
Cook G, Williams C, Brown JM, Cairns DA, Cavenagh J, Snowden JA, et al. High-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation as consolidation therapy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after previous autologous stem-cell transplantation (NCRI Myeloma X Relapse [Intensive trial]): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:874–85. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70245-1. PubMed DOI
Giralt S, Garderet L, Durie B, Cook G, Gahrton G, Bruno B, et al. American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network, and International Myeloma Working Group Consensus Conference on salvage hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21:2039–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.016. PubMed DOI PMC
Maybury B, Cook G, Pratt G, Yong K, Ramasamy K. Augmenting autologous stem cell transplantation to improve outcomes in myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2016;22:1926–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.06.004. PubMed DOI
Pratt G, Morris TC. Review of the NICE guidelines for multiple myeloma. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017;39:3–13. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12581. PubMed DOI
Kim JS, Yoon DH, Park S, Yoon SS, Cho SG, Min CK, et al. Prognostic factors for re-mobilization using plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma previously failing mobilization with G-CSF with or without chemotherapy: the Korean multicenter retrospective study. Ann Hematol. 2016;95:603–11. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2589-y. PubMed DOI
Sheppard D, Bredeson C, Huebsch L, Allan D, Tay J. A plerixafor-based strategy allows adequate hematopoietic stem cell collection in poor mobilizers: results from the Canadian Special Access Program. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2014;49:751–5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.33. PubMed DOI
Spoerl S, Peter R, Wascher D, Gotze K, Verbeek M, Peschel C, et al. Patients’ outcome after rescue plerixafor administration for autologous stem cell mobilization: a single-center retrospective analysis. Transfusion. 2017;57:115–21. doi: 10.1111/trf.13883. PubMed DOI
Micallef IN, Stiff PJ, Nademanee AP, Maziarz RT, Horwitz ME, Stadtmauer EA, et al. Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with non-hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up report. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2018;24:1187–95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.01.039. PubMed DOI PMC
Nahi H, Celanovic M, Liu Q, Lund J, Peceliunas V. A pilot, exploratory, randomized, phase ii safety study evaluating tumor cell mobilization and apheresis product contamination in patients treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone or plus plerixafor. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2019;25:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.020. PubMed DOI
Chang H, Qi XY, Samiee S, Yi QL, Chen C, Trudel S, et al. Genetic risk identifies multiple myeloma patients who do not benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2005;36:793–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705131. PubMed DOI
Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, Charbonnel C, Garban F, Hulin C, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood. 2007;109:3489–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-040410. PubMed DOI
Shaughnessy JD, Jr., Zhan F, Burington BE, Huang Y, Colla S, Hanamura I, et al. A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood. 2007;109:2276–84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038430. PubMed DOI
Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, Roza K, Meier DE, Morrison RS, et al. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014;49:1701–20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182. PubMed DOI PMC
Costa LJ, Abbas J, Hogan KR, Kramer C, McDonald K, Butcher CD, et al. Growth factor plus preemptive (‘just-in-time’) plerixafor successfully mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells in multiple myeloma patients despite prior lenalidomide exposure. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2012;47:1403–8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.60. PubMed DOI
Wehr VH, Corneau JM. Efficacy and cost analysis of a plerixafor protocol for peripheral blood stem-cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma or non-hodgkin lymphoma. J Hematol Oncol Pharm. 2016;6:139–43.
Micallef IN, Sinha S, Gastineau DA, Wolf R, Inwards DJ, Gertz MA, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-adapted algorithm of plerixafor use for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2013;19:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.010. PubMed DOI
Douglas KW, Gilleece M, Hayden P, Hunter H, Johnson PRE, Kallmeyer C, et al. UK consensus statement on the use of plerixafor to facilitate autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection to support high-dose chemoradiotherapy for patients with malignancy. J Clin Apher. 2018;33:46–59. doi: 10.1002/jca.21563. PubMed DOI
Duong HK, Savani BN, Copelan E, Devine S, Costa LJ, Wingard JR, et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2014;20:1262–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.003. PubMed DOI
Moreb JS, Byrne M, Shugarman I, Zou F, Xiong S, May WS, et al. Poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization affects long-term outcomes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. J Clin Apher. 2018;33:29–37. doi: 10.1002/jca.21556. PubMed DOI
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01362972