In the present study, we analyzed the morphology of three genetic types of the bird-infecting acanthocephalan Polymorphus cf. minutus (PspT1, PspT2, PspT3), mainly based on the cystacanth-stage obtained from amphipods (Gammarus fossarum, Gammarus pulex, Gammarus roeselii, Echinogammarus spp.). Males and females were pooled as there was no considerable difference between the sexes concerning the hook measurements. Additionally, we conducted a laboratory infection of one domestic duck for each Polymorphus type, to compare their performance and localization in this host species, and to obtain adult specimens for morphological comparison. The recovery rate from the ducks 4 weeks after infection was 16% for PspT1, 23.8% for PspT2, and 25% for PspT3. The adult worms were gravid, and the females contained mature eggs. Hook size did not differ considerably between cystacanths and adults of the respective type. The three Polymorphus types could be distinguished based on the cystacanth stage by a linear discriminant analysis that included hook measurements, proboscis length, proboscis width, and number of longitudinal hook rows and hooks per row. Furthermore, PspT3 was more different from PspT1 and PspT2 than the latter types from each other. Mainly the number of longitudinal hook rows differed in PspT3 from the existing descriptions of P. minutus (mainly 14 vs. mainly 16 rows). Potentially, PspT3 could be a non-indigenous parasite that was introduced with G. roeselii and that adapted to use the indigenous G. pulex as a host, while PspT2 might have been introduced to central Europe together with Echinogammarus spp.

Aquatic Ecology and Centre for Water and Environmental Research University of Duisburg Essen Universitätsstr 5 45141 Essen Germany

Department of Parasitology Charles University Viničná 7 CZ 128 44 Prague 2 Czechia

Department of Zoology University of Johannesburg PO Box 524 Auckland Park Johannesburg 2006 South Africa

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Infect Genet Evol. 2011 Jul;11(5):1083-90 PubMed

Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1958 Mar;52(1):36-47 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2007 Feb;37(2):191-8 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2010 Apr;96(2):453-64 PubMed

Parasitology. 2018 Sep;145(11):1421-1429 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Oct;127:30-45 PubMed

Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019 Feb 01;8:135-144 PubMed

Parasitology. 2012 Jun;139(7):945-55 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2019 May;49(6):429-435 PubMed

Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2018 Jan 04;7(1):34-43 PubMed

Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jun 03;8:300 PubMed

J Helminthol. 2018 Mar;92(2):197-202 PubMed

Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019 Feb 02;8:145-155 PubMed

Parasitology. 1968 Feb;58(1):231-46 PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2004 Oct;59(2):147-57 PubMed