The effect on motor paralysis of a deviation in the stun shot placement from the ideal point on cattle skulls was monitored in 627 bovine animals (271 bulls and 356 cows) stunned with a captive bolt during slaughter in a slaughterhouse. The number of animals that experienced motor paralysis and the necessary fall of the animal in the stunning box were recorded after the stun shot. Subsequently, the position of the stun shot was measured on the skull of the slaughtered cattle in relation to the ideal point on the skull, and at a deviation from the ideal point, the quadrant on the skull in which the bullet was located was determined. The results show that with the increasing distance of the placement of the stun shot from the ideal point on the skull, the incidence of failure to induce motor paralysis in cattle increases significantly (p < 0.01) from 2.4% (within 3 cm of deviation) to 72.2% (at deviations ˃ 7 cm). There was a significant increase in the failure to induce motor paralysis in bulls as well as in cows, but this was more frequent in bulls regardless of the magnitude of the deviation from the ideal point (with the exception of a distance greater than 7 cm where the chances of inducing motor paralysis in bulls and cows are equally low). The incidence of failure to induce motor paralysis in cattle was not dependent on the placement of a stun shot in various quadrants on the skull. With the increasing deviation in any direction from the ideal point, the likelihood of effective stunning of cattle decreases. The results are important from the animal welfare point of view of the slaughter of cattle, and demonstrate the necessity of optimum placement of the stunning shot on the bovine skull in order to achieve the successful motor paralysis of cattle during their stunning at the slaughterhouse.

Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno 612 42 Brno Czech Republic

Department of Food Hygiene and Technology and Gastronomy Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno 612 42 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Terlouw E.M.C., Bourguet C., Deiss V., Mallet C. Origins of movements following stunning and during bleeding in cattle. Meat Sci. 2015;110:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.07.010. PubMed DOI

Oliveira S.E.O., Gregory N.G., Costa F.A.D., Gibson T.J., Costa O.A.D., da Costa M.J.R.P. Effectiveness of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolts in stunning cattle. Meat Sci. 2018;140:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.010. PubMed DOI

Kamenik J., Paral V., Pyszko M., Voslarova E. Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review. Anim. Sci. J. 2019;90:307–316. doi: 10.1111/asj.13168. PubMed DOI

Fries R., Schrohe K., Lotz F., Arndt G. Application of captive bolt to cattle stunning – a survey of stunner placement under practical conditions. Animal. 2012;6:1124–1128. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002667. PubMed DOI

Gregory N.G., Lee C.J., Widdicombe J.P. Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Sci. 2007;77:499–503. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.026. PubMed DOI

Atkinson S., Velarde A., Algers B. Assessment of stun quality at commercial slaughter in cattle shot with captive bolt. Anim. Welf. 2013;22:473–481. doi: 10.7120/09627286.22.4.473. DOI

Von Wenzlawowicz M., von Holleben K., Eser E. Identifying reasons for stun failures in slaughterhouses for cattle and pigs: A field study. Anim. Welf. 2012;21:51–60. doi: 10.7120/096272812X13353700593527. DOI

Grandin T. Making abattoirs more humane for cattle, pigs, and sheep. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2013;1:491–512. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103713. PubMed DOI

Grandin T. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants. J. Am. Vet. Med. A. 2002;221:1258–1261. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.1258. PubMed DOI

Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 2010.

Von Holleben K. Intelligent prevention of fail stunning. Fleischwirtsch. Int. 2009;27:26–30.

European Union Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2009;303:1–30.

Daly C.C., Gregory N.G., Wotton S.B. Captive bolt stunning of cattle—Effects on brain-function and role of bolt velocity. Brit. Vet. J. 1987;143:574–580. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(87)90049-2. PubMed DOI

Gouveia K.G., Ferreira P.G., Roque de Costa J.C., Vaz-Pires P., Martins da Costa P. Assessment of the efficiency captive-bolt stunning in cattle and feasibility of associated behavioural signs. Anim. Welf. 2009;18:171–175.

Terlouw C., Bourguet C., Deiss V. Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing. Meat Sci. 2016;118:133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.011. PubMed DOI