The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of gender and gender stereotype traits (masculinity, femininity) in cyber victimization behaviors (cyber relational victimization, cyber verbal victimization, hacking) through different technologies (mobile phones, gaming consoles, social networking sites). There were 456 8th graders (226 females; M age = 13.66, SD = 0.41) from two midwestern middle schools in the United States included in this study. They completed questionnaires on their endorsement of masculine and feminine traits, and self-reported cyber victimization through different technologies. The findings revealed main effects of types of cyber victimization for boys and of technology for girls. In particular, boys with feminine traits experienced the most victimization by cyber verbal aggression, cyber relational aggression, and hacking when compared to the other groups of boys. Girls with feminine traits experienced the most cyber victimization through social networking sites, gaming consoles, and mobile phones in comparison to the other groups of girls. For girls with feminine traits, they reported more cyber relational victimization and cyber verbal victimization through mobile phones and social networking sites, as well as more hacking via social networking sites. Such findings underscore the importance of considering gender stereotype traits, types of victimization, and technologies when examining cyber victimization.

Department of Educational Studies University of Potsdam 14476 Potsdam Germany

Department of Psychology Pennsylvania State University State College PA 16802 USA

Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University 60200 Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Kowalski R.M., Limber S.P., McCord A. A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggress. Violence Behav. 2019;45:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009. DOI

Bauman S., Toomey R.B., Walker J.L. Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. J. Adolesc. 2013;36:341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001. PubMed DOI

Connell N.M., Schell-Busey N.M., Pearce A.N., Negro P. Badgrlz? Exploring sex differences in cyberbullying behaviors. Youth Violence Juv. Justice. 2014;13:209–228. doi: 10.1177/1541204013503889. DOI

Smith P.K., Lopez-Castro L., Robin S., Goerzig A. Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys. Aggress. Violence Behav. 2019;45:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.04.006. DOI

Sun S., Fan X., Du J. Cyberbullying perpetration: A meta-analysis of gender differences. Int. J. Internet Sci. 2016;11:61–81.

Juvonen J., Gross E.F. Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J. Sch. Health. 2008;78:496–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x. PubMed DOI

Wright M.F., Li Y. The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. J. Youth Adolesc. 2013;42:662–674. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3. PubMed DOI

Underwood M.K., Rosen L.H. Gender and bullying: Moving beyond mean differences to consider conceptions of bullying, processes by which bullying unfolds, and cyber bullying. In: Espelage D., Swearer S., editors. Bullying in North American Schools. Routledge; New York, NY, USA: 2011. pp. 33–42.

Dehue F., Bolman C., Vollink T. Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perceptions. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2008;11:217–223. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0008. PubMed DOI

Ortega R., Elipe P., Mora-Merchan J.A., Calmaestra J., Vega E. The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. J. Psychol. 2009;217:224–226. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.197. DOI

Bussey K., Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of gender development and functioning. In: Eagly H., Beall A., Sternberg R., editors. A the Psychology of Gender. Guilford; New York, NY, USA: 2004. pp. 92–119.

Eagly A.H., Wood W. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Am. Psychol. 1999;54:408–423. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408. DOI

Bayraktar F. A step toward understanding cross-national and cross-cultural variances in cyberbullying. In: Rosen L.D., Cheever N.A., Carrier L.M., editors. The Wiley Handbook of Psychology, Technology, and Society. Wiley; New York, NY, USA: 2015. pp. 158–175.

Kritsotakis G., Papanikolaou M., Androulakis E., Philalithis A.E. Associations of bullying and cyberbullying with substance use and sexual risk taking in young adults. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2017;49:360–370. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12299. PubMed DOI

McInroy L.B., Mishna F. Cyberbullying on online gaming platforms for children and youth. Child Adolesc. Soc. Work J. 2017;34:597–607. doi: 10.1007/s10560-017-0498-0. DOI

Vieira C.C., Matos A., Amado J., Freire I., Simao M.V. Boys’ and girls’ cyberbullying behaviors in Portugal: Exploring sex differences in adolescence using gender lenses. Ex Aequo. 2017;34:143–159. doi: 10.22355/exaequo.2016.34.10. DOI

Menesini E., Nocentini A., Palladino B.E., Frisen A., Berne S.L., Ortega-Ruiz R., Calmaestra J., Scheithauer H.L., Schultze-Krumbholz A., Luik P.L., et al. Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2012;15:455–463. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0040. PubMed DOI PMC

Palladino B.E., Menesini E., Nocentini A., Luik P., Naruskov K., Ucanok Z., Dogan A.L., Schultze-Krumbholz A., Hess M., Scheithauer H. Perceived severity of cyberbullying: Differences and similarities across four countries. Front. Psychol. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01524. PubMed DOI PMC

Finkelhor D., Mitchell K.J., Wolak J. Online victimization: What youth tell us. In: Cooper S.W., Estes R.J., Giardino A.P., Kellogg N.D., Vieth V.I., editors. Medical, Legal, and Social Science Aspects of Child Sexual Exploitation: A Comprehensive Review of Pornography, Prostitution, and Internet Crimes. GW Medical Publishing Inc.; St Louis, MO, USA: 2005. pp. 437–467.

Rivers I., Noret N. ‘I h 8 u’: Findings form a five-year study of text and e-mail bullying. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2010;36:543–571. doi: 10.1080/01411920903071918. DOI

Guimetti G.W., Kowalski R.M. Cyberbullying matters: Examining the incremental impact of cyberbullying on outcomes over and above traditional bullying in North America. In: Navarro R., Yubero S., Larranaga E., editors. Cyberbullying Across the Globe. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2017. pp. 117–130.

Huang Y., Chou C. An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010;26:1581–1590. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005. DOI

Erdur-Baker O. Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender, and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc. 2010;12:109–125. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341260. DOI

Wachs S., Junger M., Sittichai R. Traditional, Cyber and Combined Bullying Roles: Differences in Risky Online and Offline Activities. Societies. 2015;5:109–135. doi: 10.3390/soc5010109. DOI

Bauman S. Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. J. Early Adolesc. 2010;30:803–833. doi: 10.1177/0272431609350927. DOI

König A., Gollwitzer M., Steffgen G. Cyberbullying as an act of revenge? Aust. J. Guid. Couns. 2010;20:210–224. doi: 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210. DOI

Raskauskas J., Stoltz A.D. Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev. Psychol. 2007;43:564–575. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564. PubMed DOI

Görzig A., Frumkin L. Cyberbullying experiences on-the-go: When social media can become distressing. Cyberpsychol. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace. 2013;7 doi: 10.5817/CP2013-1-4. DOI

Raskauskas J. Multiple peer victimization among elementary school students: Relations with social-emotional problems. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2010;13:523–539. doi: 10.1007/s11218-010-9124-0. DOI

Vandebosch H., Van Cleemput K. Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media Soc. 2009;11:1349–1371. doi: 10.1177/1461444809341263. DOI

Popovic-Citic B., Djuric S., Cvetkovic V. The prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents: A case study of middle schools in Serbia. Sch. Psychol. Int. 2011;32:412–424. doi: 10.1177/0143034311401700. DOI

Terman L.M., Miles C.C. Sex and Personality. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 1936.

Maccoby E.E. The Two Sexes: Growing up Apart, Coming Together. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1998.

Richardson D., Hammock G. Social context of human aggression: Are we paying too much attention to gender? Aggress. Violent Behav. 2007;12:417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.11.001. DOI

Underwood M.K., Galen B.R., Paquette J.A. Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can’t we all just get along? Soc. Dev. 2001;10:248–266. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00162. DOI

Navarro R., Larranaga E., Yubero S. Bullying-victimization problems and aggressive tendencies in Spanish secondary school students: The role of gender stereotypical traits. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2011;14:457–473. doi: 10.1007/s11218-011-9163-1. DOI

Bem S.L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1974;42:155–162. doi: 10.1037/h0036215. PubMed DOI

Britsch B., Wakefield W.D. The influence of ethnic identity status and gender-role identity on social anxiety and avoidance in Latina adolescents; Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting on the American Educational Research Association; San Diego, CA, USA. 17 April 1998.

Keung M. The relation of gender-role classifications to the prosocial and antisocial behavior of Chinese adolescents. J. Genet. Psychol. Res. Theory Hum. Dev. 2005;166:189–201. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.166.2.189-202. PubMed DOI

Ferrer-Cascales R., Albaladejo-Blazquiz N., Sanchez-SanSegndo M., Portilla-Tamarit I., Lordan O., Ruiz-Robledillo N. Effectiveness of the TEI program for bullying and cyberbullying reduction and school climate improvement. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:580. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040580. PubMed DOI PMC