Post-marital residence patterns are an important aspect of human social organization. However, identifying such patterns in prehistoric societies is challenging since they leave almost no direct traces in archaeological records. Cross-cultural researchers have attempted to identify correlates of post-marital residence through the statistical analysis of ethnographic data. Several studies have demonstrated that, in agricultural societies, large dwellings (over ca. 65 m2) are associated with matrilocality (spouse resides with or near the wife's family), whereas smaller dwellings are associated with patrilocality (spouse resides with or near the husband's family). In the present study, we tested the association between post-marital residence and dwelling size (average house floor area) using phylogenetic comparative methods and a global sample of 86 pre-industrial societies, 22 of which were matrilocal. Our analysis included the presence of agriculture, sedentism, and durability of house construction material as additional explanatory variables. The results confirm a strong association between matrilocality and dwelling size, although very large dwellings (over ca. 200 m2) were found to be associated with all types of post-marital residence. The best model combined dwelling size, post-marital residence pattern, and sedentism, the latter being the single best predictor of house size. The effect of agriculture on dwelling size becomes insignificant once the fixity of settlement is taken into account. Our results indicate that post-marital residence and house size evolve in a correlated fashion, namely that matrilocality is a predictable response to an increase in dwelling size. As such, we suggest that reliable inferences about the social organization of prehistoric societies can be made from archaeological records.

Department of Archaeology Faculty of Arts Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czechia

Institute of Archaeology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Peoples J, Bailey G. Humanity: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, Ninth Edition Belmont, Canada: Cengage Learning; 2011.

Murdock GP. Ethnographic atlas: a summary. Ethnology. 1967;6:109–236.

Divale WT, Harris M. Population, Warfare, and the Male Supremacist Complex. American Anthropologist. 1976;78:521–38.

Marlowe FM. Marital Residence among Foragers. Current Anthropology. 2004;45(2):277–84.

Murdock GP. Social Structure. London: Macmillan Company; 1949.

Agarwal B. Who sows? Who reaps? Women and land rights in India. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 1988;15(4):531–81.

Korotayev A. Unilocal residence and unilineal descent: a reconsideration. World Cultures. 2004;15:79–110.

Korotayev A. Division of Labor by Gender and Postmarital Residence in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Reconsideration. Cross-Cultural Research. 2003;37(4):335–72.

Divale WT. Migration, External Warfare, and Matrilocal Residence. Behavior Science Research. 1974;9(2):75–133.

Ember M, Ember CR. The Conditions Favoring Matrilocal versus Patrilocal Residence. American Anthropologist. 1971;73(3):571–94.

Ember CR. An Evaluation of Alternative Theories of Matrilocal Versus Patrilocal Residence. Behavior Science Research. 1974;9(2):135–49.

Mattison SM, Shenk MK, Thompson ME, Mulder MB, Fortunato L. The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2019;374(1780):20190007. PubMed PMC

Jordan FM, Gray RD, Greenhill SJ, Mace R. Matrilocal residence is ancestral in Austronesian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2009;276:1957–64. PubMed PMC

Stojanowski CM, Schillaci MA. Phenotypic approaches for understanding patterns of intracemetery biological variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2006;131(S43):49–88. PubMed

Fortunato L. Reconstructing the History of Residence Strategies in Indo-European—Speaking Societies: Neo-, Uxori-, and Virilocality. Human Biology. 2011;83(1):107–28. 10.3378/027.083.0107 PubMed DOI

Allen WL, Richardson JB. The Reconstruction of Kinship from Archaeological Data: The Concepts, the Methods, and the Feasibility. American Antiquity. 1971;36(1):41–53.

Dumond DE. Science in Archaeology: The Saints Go Marching in. American Antiquity. 1977;42(3):330–49.

Bentley RA. Strontium Isotopes from the Earth to the Archaeological Skeleton: A Review. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2006;13(3):135–87.

Bentley RA, Bickle P, Fibiger L, Nowell GM, Dale CW, Hedges REM, et al. Community differentiation and kinship among Europe’s first farmers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(24):9326–30. PubMed PMC

Haak W, Brandt G, Jong HNd, Meyer C, Ganslmeier R, Heyd V, et al. Ancient DNA, Strontium isotopes, and osteological analyses shed light on social and kinship organization of the Later Stone Age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(47):18226. PubMed PMC

Sjögren K-G, Price TD, Kristiansen K. Diet and Mobility in the Corded Ware of Central Europe. PloS one. 2016;11(5):e0155083 10.1371/journal.pone.0155083 PubMed DOI PMC

Mittnik A, Massy K, Knipper C, Wittenborn F, Friedrich R, Pfrengle S, et al. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science. 2019;366(6466):731–34. 10.1126/science.aax6219 PubMed DOI

Bentley RA, Pietrusewsky M, Douglas MT, Atkinson Tim C. Matrilocality during the prehistoric transition to agriculture in Thailand? Antiquity. 2005;79(306):865–81.

Bentley RA, Tayles N, Higham C, Macpherson C, Atkinson Tim C. Shifting Gender Relations at Khok Phanom Di, Thailand: Isotopic Evidence from the Skeletons. Current Anthropology. 2007;48(2):301–14.

Oota H, Settheetham-Ishida W, Tiwawech D, Ishida T, Stoneking M. Human mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation is correlated with matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Nature Genetics. 2001;29:20–1. 10.1038/ng711 PubMed DOI

Lalueza-Fox C, Rosas A, Estalrrich A, Gigli E, Campos PF, García-Tabernero A, et al. Genetic evidence for patrilocal mating behavior among Neandertal groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(1):250–3. PubMed PMC

Bolnick DA, Smith DG. Migration and Social Structure among the Hopewell: Evidence from Ancient DNA. American Antiquity. 2007;72(4):627–44.

Vigilant L, Langergraber KE. Inconclusive evidence for patrilocality in Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(18):E87. PubMed PMC

Kumar V, Langstieh BT, Madhavi KV, Naidu VM, Singh HP, Biswas S, et al. Global Patterns in Human Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosome Variation Caused by Spatial Instability of the Local Cultural Processes. PLOS Genetics. 2006;2(4):e53 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020053 PubMed DOI PMC

Ly G, Alard B, Laurent R, Lafosse S, Toupance B, Monidarin C, et al. Residence rule flexibility and descent groups dynamics shape uniparental genetic diversities in South East Asia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2018;165(3):480–91. 10.1002/ajpa.23374 PubMed DOI

Gunnarsdóttir ED, Nandineni MR, Li M, Myles S, Gil D, Pakendorf B, et al. Larger mitochondrial DNA than Y-chromosome differences between matrilocal and patrilocal groups from Sumatra. Nature Communications. 2011;2:228 10.1038/ncomms1235 PubMed DOI

Karmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Sayres MAW, Järve M, Talas UG, et al. A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Research. 2015;25(4):459–66. 10.1101/gr.186684.114 PubMed DOI PMC

Zeng TC, Aw AJ, Feldman MW. Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):2077 10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Mace R, Pagel M. The Comparative Method in Anthropology. Current Anthropology. 1994;35(5):549–564.

Nunn CL. The Comparative Approach in Evolutionary Anthropology and Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011.

Fortunato L, Jordan F. Your place or mine? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of marital residence in Indo-European and Austronesian societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2010;365:3913–22. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0017 PubMed DOI PMC

Opie C, Shultz S, Atkinson QD, Currie T, Mace R. Phylogenetic reconstruction of Bantu kinship challenges Main Sequence Theory of human social evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:17414–9. PubMed PMC

Walker RS, Wichmann S, Mailund T, Atkisson CJ. Cultural phylogenetics of the Tupi language family in lowland South America. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(4): e35025 10.1371/journal.pone.0035025 PubMed DOI PMC

Moravec JC, Atkinson Q, Bowern C, Greenhill SJ, Jordan FM, Ross RM, et al. Post-marital residence patterns show lineage-specific evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2018;29(6):594–601.

Jordan F. A comparative phylogenetic approach to Austronesian cultural evolution. Ph.D. Thesis, University College London. 2007. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1446081/

Surowiec A, Snyder KT, Creanza N. A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2019;374(1780):20180077. PubMed PMC

Walker RS, Flinn MV, Hill KR. Evolutionary history of partible paternity in lowland South America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(45):19195–200. PubMed PMC

Ember CR, Ember M. Cross-Cultural Research Methods. Lanham: AltaMire Press; 2009.

Ember M. An archaeological indicator of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. American Antiquity. 1973;38(2):177–82.

Divale WT. Living floor area and marital residence: A replication. Behavior Science Research. 1977;12(2):109–15.

Brown BM. Population estimation from floor area: A restudy of “Naroll’s Constant”. Behavior Science Research. 1987;21:1–49.

Porčić M. House Floor Area as a Correlate of Marital Residence Pattern: A Logistic Regression Approach. Cross-Cultural Research. 2010;44(4):405–24.

Hart JP. Maize, Matrilocality, Migration, and Northern Iroquoian Evolution. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2001;8(2):151–82.

Peregrine PN. Matrilocality, Corporate Strategy, and the Organization of Production in the Chacoan World. American Antiquity. 2001;66(1):36–46.

Schillaci MA, Stojanowski CM. A Reassessment of Matrilocality in Chacoan Culture. American Antiquity. 2002;67(2):343–56.

Peregrine PN, Ember M. Response to Schillaci and Stojanowski. American Antiquity. 2002;67(2):357–9.

Schillaci MA, Stojanowski CM. Postmarital Residence and Biological Variation at Pueblo Bonito. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2003;120(1):1–15. 10.1002/ajpa.10147 PubMed DOI

Ensor BE. The Archaeology of Kinship: Advancing Interpretation and Contributions to Theory. Tuscon: The University of Arizona Press; 2013.

Ensor BE. Testing Ethnological Theories on Prehistoric Kinship. Cross-Cultural Research. 2017;51(3):1–29.

Souvatzi S. Kinship and Social Archaeology. Cross-Cultural Research. 2017;51(2):172–95.

Ember M. The Emergence of Neolocal Residence. New York Academy of Sciences, Transactions. 1967;30(2):291–302. PubMed

Ember CR, Ember M. The Conditions Favoring Multilocal Residence. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. 1972;28(4):382–400.

Tylor EB. On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1889;18:245–72.

Murdock GP, White DR. Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. Ethnology. 1969;8(4):329–69.

Dow MM, Eff EA. Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross-Cultural Research. 2008;42(2):148–71.

Minocher R, Duda P, Jaeggi AV. Explaining marriage patterns in a globally representative sample through socio-ecology and population history: A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using a new supertree. Evol Hum Behav. 2019;40(2):176–87.

Kohler TA, Smith ME, Bogaard A, Feinman GM, Peterson CE, Betzenhauser A, et al. Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica. Nature. 2017;551(7682):619–22. 10.1038/nature24646 PubMed DOI PMC

Duda P, Zrzavý J. Human population history revealed by a supertree approach. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:10 10.1038/s41598-016-0003-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Duda P, Zrzavý J. Towards a global phylogeny of human populations based on genetic and linguistic data In: Sahle Y, Reyes-Centeno H, Bentz C, editors. Modern Human Origins and Dispersal. Words, Bones, Genes, Tools: DFG Center for Advanced Studies Series. 1 ed Tübingen: Kerns Verlag; 2019. p. 331–59.

Kirby KR, Gray RD, Greenhill SJ, Jordan FM, Gomes-Ng S, Bibiko H-J, et al. D-PLACE: A Global Database of Cultural, Linguistic and Environmental Diversity. PloS one. 2016;11(7):e0158391 10.1371/journal.pone.0158391 PubMed DOI PMC

Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999;401:877–84. 10.1038/44766 PubMed DOI

Fritz SA, Purvis A. Selectivity in Mammalian Extinction Risk and Threat Types: a New Measure of Phylogenetic Signal Strength in Binary Traits. Conservation Biology. 2010;24(4):1042–51. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x PubMed DOI

Revell LJ. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;3(2):217–23.

Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T. The caper package: comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R package version 5.2. 2013;1–36.

Pagel M. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1994;255(1342):37–45.

Llamas B, Fehren-Schmitz L, Valverde G, Soubrier J, Mallick S, Rohland N, et al. Ancient mitochondrial DNA provides high-resolution time scale of the peopling of the Americas. Science Advances. 2016;2(4):e1501385 10.1126/sciadv.1501385 PubMed DOI PMC

Kapches M. The Iroquoian longhouse: architectural and cultural identity In: Kerber JE, editor. Archaeology of the Iroquois: Selected readings and research sources. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press; 2007. p. 174–88.

Linton R. The Origin of the Plains Earth Lodge. American Anthropologist. 1924;26(2):247–57.

Stewart H. Cedar: Tree of Life to the Northwest Coast Indians. Vancouver: Douglas & Mclntyre; 1984.

Murphy RF. Headhunter's heritage: social and economic change among the Mundurucú Indians. Berkley: University of California Press; 1960.

Wagley C, Galvão E. The Tapirapé In: Steward JH, editor. Handbook of South American Indians, Vol 3, The Tropical Forest Tribes. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institute; 1948. p. 167–78.

Métraux A. The Tupinamba In: Steward JH, editor. Handbook of South American Indians, Vol 3, The Tropical Forest Tribes. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution; 1948. p. 95–133.

Marlowe FW. Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 2005;14(2):54–67.

Ames KM. The Northwest Coast: Complex Hunter-Gatherers, Ecology, and Social Evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1994;23:209–29.

Metcalf P. The Life of the Longhouse: An Archaeology of Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

Holmberg AR. Nomads of the Long Bow: The Siriono of Eastern Bolivia. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.; 1950.

Lamphere L. Strategies, Cooperation, and Conflict Among Women in Domestic Groups In: Rosaldo MZ, Lamphere L, editors. Woman, Culture, and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1974. p. 97–112.

Harrell S. Human Families: Social Change in Global Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press; 1999.

Burbank VK. Female Aggression in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Behavior Science Research. 1987;21(1–4):70–100.

Walker RS. Human Residence Patterns In: Scott RA, Kosslyn SM, editors. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 1–8.

Veniaminov I. Zapiski ob ostravach Unalaᘜkinskago otděla. St. Petersburg: Tip. Imp. Rossijskoj Akad.; 1840.

Freeman D. The family system of the Iban of Borneo In: Goody J, editor. The developmental cycle in domestic groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1958. p. 15–52.

Holden CJ, Sear R, Mace R. Matriliny as daughter-biased investment. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2003;24(2):99–112.

Aberlee DF. Matrilineal descent in cross-cultural perspective In: Schneider DM, Gough K, editors. Matrilineal Kinship. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1961.

Holden CJ, Mace R. Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa: a coevolutionary analysis. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1532):2425–33. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2535 PubMed DOI PMC

Hartung J. Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1985;8(4):661–70.

Flinn M. Uterine vs. agnatic kinship variability and associated cross-cousin marriage preferences: an evolutionary biological analysis In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW, editors. Natural selection and social behavior. New York: Chiron Press; 1981. p. 439–75.

Lantis M. The Aleut Social System: 1750 to 1810, from Early Historical Sources In: Lantis M, editor. Ethnohistory in Southwestern Alaska and the Southern Yukon: Method and Content. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press; 1970. p. 139–301.

Burling R. Rengsanggri: Family and kinship in a Garo village. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1963.

Playfair A. The Garos. London: David Nutt; 1909.

Fulop M. Aspectos de la Cultura Tukana: Cosmogonía. Revista Colombiana de Antropologia. 1954;3:97–137.

Silva ABAd. A civilizaçao indigena do Uaupés. Sao Paulo: Centro de Pesquisas de Iauareté; 1962.

Goldman I. The Cubeo: Indians of the Northwest Amazon. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press; 1963.

Baumgarten K. Some Notes on the History of the German Hall House. Vernacular Architecture. 1976;7(1):15–20.

Kohler TA, Smith ME, editors. Ten Thousand Years of Inequality: The Archaeology of Wealth Differences. Tuscon: The Univesity of Arizona Press; 2018.

Walker RS, Beckerman S, Flinn MV, Gurven M, von Rueden CR, Kramer KL, et al. Living with Kin in Lowland Horticultural Societies. Current Anthropology. 2013;54(1):96–103.

Barnes JA. Marriage and Residential Continuity. American Anthropologist. 1960;62(5):850–66.

Castro EBVd. From the Enemy's Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazonian Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1992.

Ember M, Ember CR. Worldwide Cross-Cultural Studies and Their Relevance for Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1995;3(1):87–111.

Rasmussen S, Allentoft Morten E, Nielsen K, Orlando L, Sikora M, Sjögren K-G, et al. Early Divergent Strains of Yersinia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 Years Ago. Cell. 2015;163(3):571–82. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.009 PubMed DOI PMC

Helm J. Bilaterality in the Socio-Territorial Organization of the Arctic Drainage Dene. Ethnology. 1965;4(4):361–85.

Furholt M. Translocal Communities –Exploring Mobility and Migration in Sedentary Societies of the European Neolithic and Early Bronze Age. Praehistorische Zeitschrift. 2017;92(2):304–21.