Hospital reforms in 11 Central and Eastern European countries between 2008 and 2019: a comparative analysis
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
32113666
DOI
10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.02.003
PII: S0168-8510(20)30038-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- cross-country comparison, hospital, hospital governance, hospital payment, reform,
- MeSH
- Hospitals * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Geographicals
- Bulgaria MeSH
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Croatia MeSH
- Estonia MeSH
- Lithuania MeSH
- Latvia MeSH
- Hungary MeSH
- Poland MeSH
- Romania MeSH
- Slovakia MeSH
- Slovenia MeSH
- Europe, Eastern MeSH
This paper aims to: (1) provide a brief overview of hospital sector characteristics in 11 Central and Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia); (2) compare recent (2008 - 2019) hospital reforms in these countries; and (3) identify common trends, success factors and challenges for reforms. Methods applied involved five stages: (1) a theoretical framework of hospital sector reforms was developed; (2) basic quantitative data characterizing hospital sectors were compared; (3) a scoping review was performed to identify an initial list of reforms per country; (4) the list was sent to national researchers who described the top three reforms based on a standardized questionnaire; (5) received questionnaires were analysed and validated with available literature. Results indicate that the scope of conducted reforms is very broad. Yet, reforms related to hospital sector governance and changes in purchasing and payment systems are much more frequent than reforms concerning relations with other providers. Most governance reforms aimed at transforming hospital infrastructure, improving financial management and/or improving quality of care, while purchasing and payment reforms focused on limiting hospital activities and/or on incentivising a shift to ambulatory/day care. Three common challenges included the lack of a comprehensive approach; unclear outcomes; and political influence. Given similar reform areas across countries, there is considerable potential for shared learning.
Health Services Management Training Centre Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University Prague Czech Republic
international health financing consultant Tallinn Estonia
Medical University of Varna Bulgaria
Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic Bratislava Slovakia
National Institute of Public Health Ljubljana Slovenia
National School of Public Health Management and Professional Development Bucharest Romania
References provided by Crossref.org