Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Combined Analysis of European Biologics Databases
Language English Country Canada Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
32238520
DOI
10.3899/jrheum.190815
PII: jrheum.190815
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- TNF inhibitor, comparative effectiveness, drug survival, methotrexate, psoriatic arthritis,
- MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents * therapeutic use MeSH
- Biological Products * therapeutic use MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors MeSH
- Drug Therapy, Combination MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Arthritis, Psoriatic * drug therapy MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antirheumatic Agents * MeSH
- Biological Products * MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) is more effective for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and/or improves TNFi drug survival compared to TNFi monotherapy. METHODS: Five PsA biologics cohorts were investigated between 2000 and 2015: the ATTRA registry (Czech Republic); the Swiss Clinical Quality Management PsA registry; the Hellenic Registry of Biologics Therapies (Greece); the University of Bari PsA biologics database (Italy); and the Bath PsA cohort (UK). Drug persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and equality of survival using log-rank tests. Comparative effectiveness was investigated using logistic regression with propensity scores. Separate analyses were performed on (1) the combined Italian/Swiss cohorts for change in rate of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28); and (2) the combined Italian, Swiss, and Bath cohorts for change in rate of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). RESULTS: In total, 2294 patients were eligible for the drug survival analysis. In the Swiss (P = 0.002), Greek (P = 0.021), and Bath (P = 0.014) databases, patients starting TNFi in combination with methotrexate had longer drug survival compared to monotherapy, while in Italy the monotherapy group persisted longer (P = 0.030). In eligible patients from the combined Italian/Swiss dataset (n = 1056), there was no significant difference between treatment arms in rate of change of DAS28. Similarly, when also including the Bath cohort (n = 1205), there was no significant difference in rate of change of HAQ. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of a TNFi with a csDMARD does not appear to affect improvement of disease activity or HAQ versus TNFi monotherapy, but it may improve TNFi drug survival.
A Nightingale PhD Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology University of Bath Bath UK
A Scherer PhD SCQM Foundation Zürich Switzerland N McHugh and A Nightingale are joint senior authors
C Cavill BSc R Holland MD Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Bath UK
F Iannone MD PhD G Lapadula MD S Lopriore MD Rheumatology Unit DETO University of Bari Bari Italy
G Shaddick PhD Department of Mathematics University of Exeter Exeter UK
J Závada MD PhD K Pavelka MD PhD Institute of Rheumatology Prague Czech Republic
M J Nissen MBBS FRACP Department of Rheumatology University Hospital Geneva Geneva Switzerland
M L Thomas PhD Department of Mathematical Science University of Bath Bath UK
References provided by Crossref.org