The Profile and Development of the Lower Limb in Setswana-Speaking Children between the Ages of 2 and 9 Years
Language English Country Switzerland Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
32384742
PubMed Central
PMC7246802
DOI
10.3390/ijerph17093245
PII: ijerph17093245
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- hip anteversion angle, lower limb development, quadriceps-angle, tibiofemoral angle,
- MeSH
- Asian People MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Femur * growth & development MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Tibia * growth & development MeSH
- Interior Design and Furnishings MeSH
- Child Development MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- South Africa MeSH
Profile data on normal lower limb development and specifically tibiofemoral angle development in black, Setswana-speaking South African children are lacking. This study aimed to provide profiles on the development of the tibiofemoral angle, hip anteversion angle and tibial torsion angles in two- to nine-year-old children. Measurements of the tibiofemoral angle, intercondylar distances or intermalleolar distances, quadriceps-angle, hip anteversion- and tibial torsion angle were clinically obtained from 691 healthy two- to nine-year-old children. Two-year-old children presented with closest to genu varum at -3.4° (±3.4°). At three years, a peak of -5.7° (±2.3°) genu valgum was seen, which plateaued at -4.5° (±2.1°) at age nine years. Intermalleolar distance results support tibiofemoral angle observations. Small quadricep-angles were observed in the two-year-old group, (-3.81° ± 3.77°), which increased to a mean peak of -9.2° (±4.4°) in nine-year-olds. From the age of four years old, children presented with neutral tibial torsion angles, whilst two- and three-year-olds presented with internal tibial torsion angles. Anteversion angles were the greatest in three-year-olds at 77.6° ± 13.8° and decreased to a mean angle of 70.8° ± 6.9° in nine-year-olds. The tibiofemoral angle developed similarly to those tested in European, Asian and Nigerian children, but anteversion- and internal tibial torsion angles were greater in the Setswana population than angles reported in European children. Our findings indicate that lower limb development differs in different environments and traditions of back-carrying may influence the development, which requires further investigation.
See more in PubMed
Cheng J.C., Chan P., Chiang S., Hui P. Angular and rotational profile of the lower limb in 2630 Chinese children. J. Pediatric Orthop. 1991;11:154–161. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199103000-00003. PubMed DOI
Farr S., Kranzl A., Pablik E., Kaipel M., Ganger R. Functional and radiographic consideration of lower limb malalignment in children and adolescents with idiopathic genu valgum. J. Orthop. Res. 2014;32:1362–1370. doi: 10.1002/jor.22684. PubMed DOI
Saini U.C., Bali K., Sheth B., Gahlot N., Gahlot A. Normal development of the knee angle in healthy Indian children: A clinical study of 215 children. J. Child. Orthop. 2010;4:579–586. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0297-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Heath C., Staheli L. Normal limits of knee angle in white children--genu varum and genu valgum. J. Pediatric Orthop. 1993;13:259–262. PubMed
Oyewole O.O., Akinpelu A.O., Odole A.C. Development of the tibiofemoral angle in a cohort of Nigerian children during the first 3 years of life. J. Child. Orthop. 2013;7:167–173. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0478-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Omololu B., Tella A., Ogunlade S., Adeyemo A., Adebisi A., Alonge T., Salawu S., Akinpelu A. Normal values of knee angle, intercondylar and intermalleolar distances in Nigerian children. West Afr. J. Med. 2003;22:301–304. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v22i4.28051. PubMed DOI
Cahuzac J., Vardon D., de Gauzy J.S. Development of the clinical tibiofemoral angle in normal adolescents. A study of 427 normal subjects from 10 to 16 years of age. Bone Jt. J. 1995;77:729–732. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.77B5.7559698. PubMed DOI
Kaspiris A., Zaphiropoulou C., Vasiliadis E. Range of variation of genu valgum and association with anthropometric characteristics and physical activity: Comparison between children aged 3–9 years. J. Pediatric Orthop. B. 2013;22:296–305. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328360f9a5. PubMed DOI
Arazi M., Ögün T.C., Memik R. Normal development of the tibiofemoral angle in children: A clinical study of 590 normal subjects from 3 to 17 years of age. J. Pediatric Orthop. 2001;21:264–267. doi: 10.1097/01241398-200103000-00027. PubMed DOI
Bafor A., Omota B., Ogbemudia A.O. Correlation between clinical tibiofemoral angle and body mass index in normal Nigerian children. Int. Orthop. 2012;36:1247–1253. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1451-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Mathew S., Madhuri V. Clinical tibiofemoral angle in South Indian children. Bone Jt. Res. 2013;2:155–161. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.28.2000157. PubMed DOI PMC
Yoo J.H., Choi I.H., Cho T.-J., Chung C.Y., Yoo W.J. Development of tibiofemoral angle in Korean children. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2008;23:714–717. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.4.714. PubMed DOI PMC
Kumar D., Gopichand P.V., Puri N. Study of knee angle in tribal children of Andhra Pradesh. Asian J. Med. Sci. 2016;7:75–81. doi: 10.3126/ajms.v7i6.15261. DOI
Ginesin E., Norman D., Peskin B. Knee Alignment and Its Significance: Is It Really Different in Various Population Groups? Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2018;20:109. PubMed
Salenius P., Vankka E. The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. Vol. 1975;57:259–261. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197557020-00021. PubMed DOI
Prajapati A. Measurement of tibiofemoral angle in Nepalese children: A clinical study in normal subjects between ages of 1-8 years. J. Chitwan Med. Coll. 2018;8:22–26. doi: 10.3126/jcmc.v8i4.23764. DOI
Kaspiris A., Grivas T., Vasiliadis E. Physiological alignment of the lower limbs changes during childhood: A clinical study in south-west Greece. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2010;1:249–251.
Riegger-Krugh C., Keysor J.J. Skeletal malalignments of the lower quarter: Correlated and compensatory motions and postures. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1996;23:164–170. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1996.23.2.164. PubMed DOI
Magee D.J. Orthopedic Physical Assessment, 2006. 4th ed. Saunders Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2006.
France L., Nester C. Effect of errors in the identification of anatomical landmarks on the accuracy of Q angle values. Clin. Biomech. 2001;16:710–713. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00045-6. PubMed DOI
WHO World Health Organization. [(accessed on 25 March 2019)]; Available online: http://apps.who.int/nutrition/landscape/report.aspx?iso=zaf.
Eberhard D.M., Simons G.F., Fennig C.D. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. [(accessed on 7 August 2019)]; Available online: https://www.ethnologue.com/language/tsn.
Peterson-Kendall F., Kendall-McCreary E., Geise-Provance P., McIntyre-Rodgers M., Romani W. Muscles Testing and Function with Posture and Pain. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore, MD, USA: 2005.
Espandar R., Mortazavi S.M.-J., Baghdadi T. Angular deformities of the lower limb in children. Asian J. Sports Med. 2010;1:46–53. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.34871. PubMed DOI PMC
Mohd-Karim M., Sulaiman A., Munajat I., Syurahbil A. Clinical measurement of the tibio-femoral angle in Malay children. Malays. Orthop. J. 2015;9:9. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1507.005. PubMed DOI PMC
Baruah R., Kumar S., Harikrishnan S. Developmental pattern of tibiofemoral angle in healthy north-east Indian children. J. Child. Orthop. 2017;11:339–347. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.170047. PubMed DOI PMC
Hahn T., Foldspang A. The Q angle and sport. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 1997;7:43–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00116.x. PubMed DOI
Raveendranath V., Nachiket S., Sujatha N., Priya R., Rema D. Bilateral variability of the quadriceps angle (Q angle) in an adult Indian population. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2011;14:465. PubMed PMC
Bhalara A., Talsaniya D., Nikita G.N. Q angle in children population aged between 7 to 12 years. Int. J. Health Sci. Res. 2013;3:57–64.
Bayraktar B., Yucesir I., Ozturk A., Cakmak A.K., Taskara N., Kale A., Demiryurek D., Bayramoglu A., Camlica H. Change of quadriceps angle values with age and activity. Saudi Med. J. 2004;25:756–760. PubMed
Mooney J.F. Lower extremity rotational and angular issues in children. Pediatric Clin. 2014;61:1175–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.006. PubMed DOI
Lincoln T.L., Suen P.W. Common rotational variations in children. Jaaos-J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2003;11:312–320. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200309000-00004. PubMed DOI
Svenningsen S., Apalset K., Terjesen T., Anda S. Regression of femoral anteversion: A prospective study of intoeing children. Acta Orthopædica Scand. 1989;60:170–173. doi: 10.3109/17453678909149246. PubMed DOI
Reikerås O. Patellofemoral characteristics in patients with increased femoral anteversion. Skelet. Radiol. 1992;21:311–313. doi: 10.1007/BF00241771. PubMed DOI
Jacquemier M., Glard Y., Pomero V., Viehweger E., Jouve J.-L., Bollini G. Rotational profile of the lower limb in 1319 healthy children. Gait Posture. 2008;28:187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.011. PubMed DOI
Fabry G., Cheng L.X., Molenaers G. Normal and abnormal torsional development in children. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1994;302:22–26. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199405000-00005. PubMed DOI
Kozic S., Gulan G., Matovinovic D., Nemec B., Sestan B., Ravlic-Gulan J. Femoral anteversion related to side differences in hip rotation: Passive rotation in 1140 children aged 8–9 years. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1997;68:533–536. doi: 10.3109/17453679708999021. PubMed DOI
Shultz S.J., Nguyen A.-D., Schmitz R.J. Differences in lower extremity anatomical and postural characteristics in males and females between maturation groups. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2008;38:137–149. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2645. PubMed DOI
Gruskay J.A., Fragomen A.T., Rozbruch S.R. Idiopathic rotational abnormalities of the lower extremities in children and adults. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Rev. 2019;7:e3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00016. PubMed DOI
Souza R.B., Powers C.M. Concurrent criterion-related validity and reliability of a clinical test to measure femoral anteversion. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2009;39:586–592. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2996. PubMed DOI
Back-Carrying in Children Is Related to Lower Limb Development