Comparison of divergent breeding management strategies in two species of semi-captive eland in Senegal
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
32483255
PubMed Central
PMC7264215
DOI
10.1038/s41598-020-65598-6
PII: 10.1038/s41598-020-65598-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Antelopes genetics growth & development MeSH
- Breeding MeSH
- Microsatellite Repeats genetics MeSH
- Polymorphism, Genetic MeSH
- Conservation of Natural Resources * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Senegal MeSH
Breeding management of small populations may have a critical influence on the development of population characteristics in terms of levels of genetic diversity and inbreeding. Two populations of antelope sister species - Critically Endangered Western Derby eland (Tauroragus derbianus derbianus) and non-native Least Concern Cape eland (Taurotragus oryx oryx) bred under different management strategies were studied in Senegal, Western Africa. The aims of the study were to compare the population genetic parameters of the two species and to test for the presence of interspecific hybrids. In total, blood and tissue samples from 76 Western Derby elands and 26 Cape elands were investigated, using 12 microsatellite markers. No hybrid individuals were detected in the sampled animals within the multispecies enclosure in Bandia Reserve, Senegal. The parameters of genetic polymorphism indicated much lower genetic diversity in Western Derby elands compared to Cape elands. On the other hand, the coefficient of inbreeding was low in both species. It is hypothesized that this could be a positive effect of strict population management of Western Derby elands, which, despite the loss of genetic diversity, minimizes inbreeding.
See more in PubMed
Primack, R. B. A primer of Conservation Biology. (Sinauer Associates, 2000).
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. & Briscoe, D. A. Introduction to conservation genetics. 617 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Frankham R. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Molecular Ecology. 2008;17:325–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03399.x. PubMed DOI
Lande, R. & Barrowclough, G. F. in Viable Populations for Conservation (ed Michael E Soulé) 87–124 (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D. & Conroy, M. J. Analysis and Management of Animal Populations. 817 (Academic Press, 2002).
Zemanová H, Černá Bolfíková B, Hulva P, Hejcmanová P, Brandlová K. Conservation genetics of the Western Derby eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal: Integration of pedigree and microsatellite data. Mammalian Biology. 2015;80:328–332. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2015.02.002. DOI
Wespi, B. et al. in International Conference on Diseases of Zoo and Wild Animals (eds G Wibbelt, P Kretzschmar, & H Hofer) 340–344 (Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, 2009).
Uzans AJ, Lucas Z, McLeod BA, Frasier TR. Small Ne of the Isolated and Unmanaged Horse Population on Sable Island. Journal of Heredity. 2015;106:660–665. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esv051. PubMed DOI
Thévenon S, Couvet D. The impact of inbreeding depression on population survival depending on demographic parameters. Animal Conservation. 2002;5:53–60. doi: 10.1017/S1367943002001075. DOI
EAZA. 177 (Amsterdam: European Association of Zoos and Aquaria. Available from, https://www.eaza.net/assets/Uploads/Governing-documents/201702-EAZA-Population-Management-Manual-V1.07-Council-approved-20131401.pdf (accessed on April 2018), 2012.
WAZA. (ed Peter J S Olney) 72 (WAZA Executive Office).
AZA. in Sixth Edition (eds Martha Fischer et al.) 180 (AZA, 2014).
Moreno E, Perez-Gonzalez J, Carranza J, Moya-Larano J. Better Fitness in Captive Cuvier’s Gazelle despite Inbreeding Increase: Evidence of Purging? Plos One. 2015;10:15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145111. PubMed DOI PMC
Pemberton JM. Wild pedigrees: the way forward. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2008;275:613–621. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1531. PubMed DOI PMC
Ito H, Ogden R, Langenhorst T, Inoue-Murayama M. Contrasting Results From Molecular and Pedigree-Based Population Diversity Measures in Captive Zebra Highlight Challenges Facing Genetic Management of Zoo Populations. Zoo Biology. 2017;36:87–94. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21342. PubMed DOI
Witzenberger KA, Hochkirch A. Ex situ conservation genetics: a review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2011;20:1843–1861. doi: 10.1007/s10531-011-0074-4. DOI
Grobler JP, et al. Management of hybridization in an endemic species: decision making in the face of imperfect information in the case of the black wildebeest-Connochaetes gnou. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2011;57:997–1006. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0567-1. DOI
Benirschke, K. in An International Conference at Dartmouth Medical School. Comparative Aspects of Reproductive Failure (ed K Benirschke) 218-234 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1967).
Dalton DL, et al. Interspecific hybridization between greater kudu and nyala. Genetica. 2014;142:265–271. doi: 10.1007/s10709-014-9772-7. PubMed DOI
Hosey, G., Melfi, V. & Pankhurst, S. Zoo Animals: Behaviour, Management, and Welfare. 696 (Oxford University Press, 2013).
IUCN. (Accessed 2018-01-24, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T22056A50197188.en, 2017).
Brandlová, K. et al. (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, 2017).
East, R. 434 (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 1999).
Nežerková P, Verner PH, Antonínová M. The conservation programme of the Western giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal – Czech Aid Development Project. Gazella. 2004;31:87–182.
Koláčková K, Hejcmanová P, Antonínová M, Brandl P. Population management as a tool in the recovery of the critically endangered Western Derby eland Taurotragus derbianus in Senegal, Africa. Wildlife Biology. 2011;17:299–310. doi: 10.2981/10-019. DOI
Brandlová, K. et al. Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) Conservation Strategy. 1st edn, 111 (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 2013).
Antonínová M, Nežerková P, Vincke X, Al-Ogoumrabe N. Herd Structure of the Giant Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in the Bandia Reserve, Senegal. Agricultira Troppica et Subtropica. 2004;37:1–5.
Antonínová, M. et al. Immobilization and transport of Western giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) from the Bandia reserve to the Fathala reserve in Senegal. Gazella33 (2006).
Kingdon, J. East African Mammals: An Atlas of Evolution in Africa, Volume 3, Part C: Bovids. 404 (University of Chicago Press, 1988).
Jorge W, Butler S, Benirschke K. Studies on a male eland x kudu hybrid. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1976;46:13–16. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0460013. PubMed DOI
Koulischer L, Tijskens J, Mortelmans J. Chromosome studies of a fertile mammalian hybrid: the offspring of the cross bongo × sitatunga (Bovoidea) Chromosoma. 1973;41:265–270. doi: 10.1007/BF00344021. PubMed DOI
Wirtu, G. Developing Embryo Technologies for the Eland Antelope (Taurotragus oryx) [PhD]. 159 (Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2004).
Abdul-Muneer PM. Application of Microsatellite Markers in Conservation Genetics and Fisheries Management: Recent Advances in Population Structure Analysis and Conservation Strategies. Genetics Research International. 2014;2014:691759. doi: 10.1155/2014/691759. PubMed DOI PMC
Qiagen. (Accessed on 2018-01-27, Available at, https://www.qiagen.com/us/resources/download.aspx?id=a541a49c-cd06-40ca-b1d2-563d0324ad6c<=en, 2010).
Matschiner M, Salzburger W. TANDEM: integrating automated allele binning into genetics and genomics workflows. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1982–1983. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp303. PubMed DOI
Castagneyrol B, Lagache L, Giffard B, Kremer A, Jactel H. Genetic Diversity Increases Insect Herbivory on Oak Saplings. Plos One. 2012;7:10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044247. PubMed DOI PMC
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2004;4:535–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x. DOI
Rousset FGENEPOP. 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2008;8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. PubMed DOI
Yang BZ, Zhao HY, Kranzler HR, Gelernter J. Practical population group assignment with selected informative markers: characteristics and properties of Bayesian clustering via STRUCTURE. Genetic Epidemiology. 2005;28:302–312. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20070. PubMed DOI
Earl DA, Vonholdt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources. 2012;4:359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7. DOI
Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N. & Bonhomme, F. (Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France), 1996-2004).
Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460. PubMed DOI PMC
Goudet J. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics. Journal of Heredity. 1995;86:485–486. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627. DOI
Hopkins, P. G. Kenana Handbook Of Sudan. 932 (Routledge, 2014).
IUCN. (Accessed on 2018-01-28, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T44172A50197518.en, 2017).
IUCN. (Accessed on 2018-01-25, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22055A50196938.en, 2017).
Fernandez MH, Vrba ES. A complete estimate of the phylogenetic relationships in Ruminantia: a dated species-level supertree of the extant ruminants. Biological Reviews. 2005;80:269–302. doi: 10.1017/s1464793104006670. PubMed DOI
Brandlová, K. et al. in Antelope, Giraffe, Hippo in the 21st Century: Conservation Action in Africa. Book of Abstracts. (eds K Brandlová et al.) 79 (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague).
Pinto PV, Beja P, Ferrand N, Godinho R. Hybridization following population collapse in a critically endangered antelope. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0002-7. PubMed DOI PMC
van Wyk AM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of hybridization and the impact on biodiversity conservation. Ecology and Evolution. 2017;7:320–330. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2595. PubMed DOI PMC
Komers, P. E., Curman, G. P., Birgersson, B. & Ekvall, K. in Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk Vol. 1 (ed L M Darling) 179–188 (Kamloops, 2000).
Kaseda Y, Khalil AM. Harem size and reproductive success of stallions in Misaki feral horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1996;47:163–173. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00675-3. DOI
Bro-Jorgensen J. Intra- and Intersexual Conflicts and Cooperation in the Evolution of Mating Strategies: Lessons Learnt From Ungulates. Evolutionary Biology. 2011;38:28–41. doi: 10.1007/s11692-010-9105-4. DOI
Hoshino, A. A., Bravo, J. P., Nobile, P. M. & Morelli, K. A. in Genetic Diversity in Microorganisms (ed Mahmut Caliskan) 149-170 (InTech, http://www.intechopen.com/books/genetic-diversity-in-microorganisms/microsatellites-as-tools-for-genetic-diversity-analysis, 2012).
Putman AI, Carbone I. Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecology and Evolution. 2014;4:4399–4428. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1305. PubMed DOI PMC
Vaz Pinto, P. Oustanding rescue of the giant sable antelope!! IUCN (2009).
Roldan, E. R. S., Cassinello, J., Abaigar, T. & Gomendio, M. in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 243-248 (The Royal Society). PubMed
Harley EH, de Waal M, Murray S, O’Ryan C. Comparison of whole mitochondrial genome sequences of northern and southern white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum): the conservation consequences of species definitions. Conservation Genetics. 2016;17:1285–1291. doi: 10.1007/s10592-016-0861-2. DOI
Hedrick PW, Fredrickson R. Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conservation Genetics. 2010;11:615–626. doi: 10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5. DOI
Jessup DA, DeJesus SR, Clark WE, Bleich VC. Evolution of ungulate capture techniques in California. California Fish and Game. 2014;100:491–526.
Ochoa A, et al. Can captive populations function as sources of genetic variation for reintroductions into the wild? A case study of the Arabian oryx from the Phoenix Zoo and the Shaumari Wildlife Reserve, Jordan. Conservation Genetics. 2016;17:1145–1155. doi: 10.1007/s10592-016-0850-5. DOI
CPSG. The One Plan Approach to Conservation, 2018).
Gusset, M., Dick, G., Lees, C. M., Wilcken, J. & Sherley, R. B.
Brandlová, K. et al. Vol. 1177 (University of Life Sciences Prague, 2018).