Crossing borders to facilitate live donor kidney transplantation: the Czech-Austrian kidney paired donation program - a retrospective study

. 2020 Oct ; 33 (10) : 1199-1210. [epub] 20200623

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32491249

Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a valuable tool to overcome immunological barriers in living donor transplantation. While small national registries encounter difficulties in finding compatible matches, multi-national KPD may be a useful strategy to facilitate transplantation. The Czech (Prague) and Austrian (Vienna) KPD programs, both initiated in 2011, were merged in 2015. A bi-national algorithm allowed for ABO- and low-level HLA antibody-incompatible exchanges, including the option of altruistic donor-initiated domino chains. Between 2011 and 2019, 222 recipients and their incompatible donors were registered. Of those, 95.7% (Prague) and 67.9% (Vienna) entered into KPD registries, and 81 patients received a transplant (95% 3-year graft survival). Inclusion of ABO-incompatible pairs in the Czech program contributed to higher KPD transplant rates (42.6% vs. 23.6% in Austria). After 2015 (11 bi-national match runs), the median pool size increased to 18 pairs, yielding 33 transplants (8 via cross-border exchanges). While matching rates doubled in Austria (from 9.1% to 18.8%), rates decreased in the Czech program, partly due to implementation of more stringent HLA antibody thresholds. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of merging small national KPD programs to increase pool sizes and may encourage the implementation of multi-national registries to expand the full potential of KPD.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Orandi BJ, Garonzik-Wang JM, Massie AB, et al. Quantifying the risk of incompatible kidney transplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 1573.

Manook M, Koeser L, Ahmed Z, et al. Post-listing survival for highly sensitised patients on the UK kidney transplant waiting list: a matched cohort analysis. Lancet 2017; 389: 727.

Gentry SE, Montgomery RA, Segev DL. Kidney paired donation: fundamentals, limitations, and expansions. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 57: 144.

Glorie K, Haase-Kromwijk B, van de Klundert J, Wagelmans A, Weimar W. Allocation and matching in kidney exchange programs. Transpl Int 2014; 27: 333.

Ferrari P, Weimar W, Johnson RJ, Lim WH, Tinckam KJ. Kidney paired donation: principles, protocols and programs. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30: 1276.

Leeser DB, Thomas AG, Shaffer AA, et al. Patient and kidney allograft survival with national kidney paired donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15: 228.

Rapaport FT. The case for a living emotionally related international kidney donor exchange registry. Transplant Proc 1986; 18: 5.

Kwak JY, Kwon OJ, Lee KS, Kang CM, Park HY, Kim JH. Exchange-donor program in renal transplantation: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 344.

Ferrari P, Fidler S, Wright J, et al. Virtual crossmatch approach to maximize matching in paired kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 272.

Cole EH, Nickerson P, Campbell P, et al. The Canadian kidney paired donation program: a national program to increase living donor transplantation. Transplantation 2015; 99: 985.

Flechner SM, Thomas AG, Ronin M, et al. The first 9 years of kidney paired donation through the National Kidney Registry: Characteristics of donors and recipients compared with National Live Donor Transplant Registries. Am J Transplant 2018; 18: 2730.

de Klerk M, Keizer KM, Claas FH, Witvliet M, Haase-Kromwijk BJ, Weimar W. The Dutch national living donor kidney exchange program. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2302.

Johnson RJ, Allen JE, Fuggle SV, Bradley JA, Rudge C. Early experience of paired living kidney donation in the United Kingdom. Transplantation 2008; 86: 1672.

Biro P, Haase-Kromwijk B, Andersson T, et al. Building kidney exchange programmes in Europe-an overview of exchange practice and activities. Transplantation 2019; 103: 1514.

Segev DL, Gentry SE, Warren DS, Reeb B, Montgomery RA. Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs. JAMA 2005; 293: 1883.

Viklicky O, Fronek J, Trunecka P, Pirk J, Lischke R. Organ transplantation in the Czech Republic. Transplantation 2017; 101: 2259.

Böhmig GA, Fidler S, Christiansen FT, Fischer G, Ferrari P. Transnational validation of the Australian algorithm for virtual crossmatch allocation in kidney paired donation. Hum Immunol 2013; 74: 500.

Böhmig GA, Fronek J, Slavcev A, Fischer GF, Berlakovich G, Viklicky O. Czech-Austrian kidney paired donation: first European cross-border living donor kidney exchange. Transpl Int 2017; 30: 638.

Wadstrom J, Biglarnia A, Gjertsen H, Sugitani A, Fronek J. Introducing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: learning curves and development based on 413 consecutive cases in four centers. Transplantation 2011; 91: 462.

Haidinger M, Schmaldienst S, Kormoczi G, et al. Vienna experience of ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2009; 121: 247.

Garonzik-Wang JM, Sullivan B, Hiller JM, et al. International kidney paired donation. Transplantation 2013; 96: e55.

Valentin MO, Garcia M, Costa AN, et al. International cooperation for kidney exchange success. Transplantation 2019; 103: e180.

Montgomery RA. Renal transplantation across HLA and ABO antibody barriers: integrating paired donation into desensitization protocols. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 449.

Ferrari P, Hughes PD, Cohney SJ, Woodroffe C, Fidler S, D'Orsogna L. ABO-incompatible matching significantly enhances transplant rates in kidney paired donation. Transplantation 2013; 96: 821.

Roodnat JI, van de Wetering J, Claas FH, Ijzermans J, Weimar W. Persistently low transplantation rate of ABO blood type O and highly sensitised patients despite alternative transplantation programs. Transpl Int 2012; 25: 987.

Blumberg JM, Gritsch HA, Reed EF, et al. Kidney paired donation in the presence of donor-specific antibodies. Kidney Int 2013; 84: 1009.

Schwaiger E, Eskandary F, Kozakowski N, et al. Deceased donor kidney transplantation across donor-specific antibody barriers: predictors of antibody-mediated rejection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 1342.

Carrero JJ, Hecking M, Chesnaye NC, Jager KJ. Sex and gender disparities in the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018; 14: 151.

Cowan N, Gritsch HA, Nassiri N, Sinacore J, Veale J. Broken chains and reneging: a review of 1748 kidney paired donation transplants. Am J Transplant 2017; 17: 2451.

Saidman SL, Roth AE, Sonmez T, Unver MU, Delmonico FL. Increasing the opportunity of live kidney donation by matching for two- and three-way exchanges. Transplantation 2006; 81: 773.

De Klerk M, Van Der Deijl WM, Witvliet MD, Haase-Kromwijk BJ, Claas FH, Weimar W. The optimal chain length for kidney paired exchanges: an analysis of the Dutch program. Transpl Int 2010; 23: 1120.

Ashlagi I, Gilchrist DS, Roth AE, Rees MA. Nonsimultaneous chains and dominos in kidney- paired donation-revisited. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 984.

Allen R, Pleass H, Clayton PA, Woodroffe C, Ferrari P. Outcomes of kidney paired donation transplants in relation to shipping and cold ischaemia time. Transpl Int 2016; 29: 425.

Gill J, Rose C, Joffres Y, Kadatz M, Gill J. Cold ischemia time up to 16 hours has little impact on living donor kidney transplant outcomes in the era of kidney paired donation. Kidney Int 2017; 92: 490.

Treat E, Chow EKH, Peipert JD, et al. Shipping living donor kidneys and transplant recipient outcomes. Am J Transplant 2018; 18: 632.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...