• This record comes from PubMed

Pediatric dens anatomy and its implications for fracture treatment: an anatomical and radiological study

. 2021 Feb ; 30 (2) : 416-424. [epub] 20200611

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
00064203 Ministry of Health (CZ)

Links

PubMed 32529523
DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06490-9
PII: 10.1007/s00586-020-06490-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources

PURPOSE: Separation of C2 growth plates and dens fractures are the most common types of injuries to the axis (C2) in children. Operative treatment of these injuries with the use of direct osteosynthesis requires a profound knowledge of detailed anatomy and dimensions of the axis. The main issue addressed by the study was the age at which the size of the dens is adequate at all levels to accommodate two screws, and the size of the posterior dens angulation angle (PDAA) in a healthy child in individual age periods. METHODS: Dimensions and angles of the dens and C2 in individual age categories in both boys and girls were measured in a series of 203 CT scans of individuals 0-18 years old and on anatomical specimens (42 samples). In addition, 5 histological series of this region from the fetal period were reviewed. RESULTS: Dimensions of the dens gradually increase with age, with a considerable acceleration during growth spurt periods that are different in boys and girls. PDAA is markedly changing with age; in the fetal period, the dens shows a slight anterior angulation which gradually transforms into posterior angulation, as early as between 4 and 6 years of age. The screw insertion angle changes accordingly. CONCLUSION: During growth, there occur changes in PDAA that should be respected in evaluation of transformation of anterior into posterior angulation, as shown by imaging methods. Dens dimensions theoretically allow insertion of two 3.5 mm screws as early as from the age of 1 year.

See more in PubMed

Babu RA, Arivazhagan A, Devi BI et al (2016) Peculiarities and patterns of cervical spine injuries in children and adolescents: a retrospective series of 84 patients from a single institute. Pediatr Neurosurg 51:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000439540 PubMed DOI

Fassett DR, McCall T, Brockmeyer DL (2006) Odontoid synchondrosis fractures in children. Neurosurg Focus 20:E7. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2006.20.2.8 PubMed DOI

Fulkerson DH, Hwang SW, Patel AJ, Jea A (2012) Open reduction and internal fixation for angulated, unstable odontoid synchondrosis fractures in children: a safe alternative to halo fixation? J Neurosurg Pediatr 9:35–41. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.10.PEDS11256 PubMed DOI

Tokunaga S, Ishii Y, Aizawa T et al (2011) Remodeling capacity of malunited odontoid process fractures in kyphotic angulation in infancy: an observation up to maturity in three patients. Spine 36:E1515–E1518. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820f6da6 PubMed DOI

Huber H, Ramseier LE, Boos N (2010) Open mouth digital reduction of an odontoid synchondrosis fracture: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop 30:115–118. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181cefe45 PubMed DOI

Godard J, Hadji M, Raul JS (1997) Odontoid fractures in the child with neurological injury. Direct anterior osteosynthesis with a cortico-spongious screw and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 13:105–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810050054 PubMed DOI

Wang J, Vokshoor A, Kim S et al (1999) Pediatric atlantoaxial instability: management with screw fixation. Pediatr Neurosurg 30:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028766 PubMed DOI

Castellana C, Kósa F (1999) Morphology of the cervical vertebrae in the fetal-neonatal human skeleton. J Anat 194:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19410147.x PubMed DOI PMC

Ogden JA (1984) Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. XII. The second cervical vertebra. Skelet Radiol 12:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00361083 DOI

Çokluk C, Aydın K, Rakunt C et al (2006) The borders of the odontoid process of c2 in adults and in children including the estimation of odontoid/body ratio. Eur Spine J 15:278–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0946-y PubMed DOI

Lee HJ, Kim JT, Shin MH et al (2015) Quantification of pediatric cervical spine growth at the cranio-vertebral junction. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 57:276–282. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.4.276 PubMed DOI PMC

Koebke J, Saternus K-S (1986) Inclination of the odontoid process in children and adults—an anatomical and functional investigation. In: Wenker H, Klinger M, Brock M, Reuter F (eds) Spinal cord tumors experimental neurosurgery neurosurgical intensive care: advances in neurosurgery, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–169 DOI

Tubbs RS, Wellons JC, Blount JP et al (2003) Inclination of the odontoid process in the pediatric Chiari I malformation. J Neurosurg 98:43–49. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2003.98.1.0043 PubMed DOI

Ladner TR, Dewan MC, Day MA et al (2015) Posterior odontoid process angulation in pediatric Chiari I malformation: an MRI morphometric external validation study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16:138–145. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.PEDS14475 PubMed DOI

Štulík J, Hodasová G, Podhráský M et al (2019) Anatomy of the dens and its implications for fracture treatment: an anatomical and radiological study. Eur Spine J 28:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5793-8 PubMed DOI

Baumann F, Ernstberger T, Neumann C et al (2015) Pediatric cervical spine injuries: a rare but challenging entity. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E377–E384. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000307 PubMed DOI

Piatt JH, Grissom LE (2011) Developmental anatomy of the atlas and axis in childhood by computed tomography. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:235–243. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.PEDS11187 PubMed DOI

Gore PA, Chang S, Theodore N (2009) Cervical spine injuries in children: attention to radiographic differences and stability compared to those in the adult patient. Semin Pediatr Neurol 16:42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spen.2009.03.003 PubMed DOI

Karwacki GM, Schneider JF (2012) Normal ossification patterns of atlas and axis: a CT study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1882–1887. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3105 PubMed DOI

Hosalkar HS, Greenbaum JN, Flynn JM et al (2009) Fractures of the odontoid in children with an open basilar synchondrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.22173 PubMed DOI

Rusin JA, Ruess L, Daulton RS (2015) New C2 synchondrosal fracture classification system. Pediatr Radiol 45:872–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3224-5 PubMed DOI

Gupta R, Narayan S (2015) Sublaminar wiring for odontoid synchondrotic fracture stabilization in a 4-year-old: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst 31:2185–2187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2770-y PubMed DOI

Labbe J, Peres O, Leclair O et al (2016) Posterior C1–C2 fixation using absorbable suture for type II odontoid fracture in 2-year-old child: description of a new technique and literature review. J Pediatr Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000637 PubMed DOI

Bapuraj JR, Bruzek AK, Tarpeh JK et al (2019) Morphometric changes at the craniocervical junction during childhood. J Neurosurg Pediatr 24:227–235. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.PEDS1968 DOI

Krmpotić-Nemanić J, Keros P (1972) Functional significance of adaptation of dens axis in the human. Verh Anat Ges 67:393–397 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...