• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Bipolar ablation with contact force-sensing of swine ventricles shows improved acute lesion features compared to sequential unipolar ablation

F. Soucek, G. Caluori, F. Lehar, J. Jez, M. Pesl, J. Wolf, A. Wojtaszczyk, S. Belaskova, Z. Starek

. 2020 ; 31 (5) : 1128-1136. [pub] 20200302

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21020580

INTRODUCTION: Despite technical progress, ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after unipolar ablation remains relatively high (12%-47%). Bipolar ablation has been proposed as an appealing solution that may overcome limitations associated with unipolar ablation settings. We designed an animal study to compare bipolar (BPA) vs sequential unipolar ablation (UPA) using contact force-sensing technology on both ablation catheters. METHODS: Twenty large white female pigs (6-months-old, 50-60 kg) underwent multiple RF ablations (30 W, 60 seconds, 30 mL/min irrigation) on the ventricular myocardium from the epicardial and endocardial sides. The hearts were fixed and scanned with high-resolution cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Thermal lesions were located and characterized in volume, depth, width, and transmurality. RESULTS: Lesion volume was calculated as the sum of epicardial or endocardial conjoined/isolated lesions at one location. Linear dimensions (width and depth) were measured twice for each location, on the endocardial and epicardial side. We evaluated 35 lesions across the intraventricular septum (UPA, N = 17 vs BPA, N = 18). No difference in volume, linear dimensions or impedance drop was observed in this area between UPA and BPA. However, BPA required half RF time and showed an increased transmurality trend. We then analyzed 73 lesions from the endocardial side (UPA, N = 35 vs BPA, N = 38) and 50 from the epicardial side (UPA, N = 11 vs BPA N = 39) of the ventricular free walls. Lesion transmurality was markedly improved by BPA (P = .030, odds ratio, 23.73 [4.71,31.96]). Ventricular BPA lesions were significantly deeper on the epicardial side (P < .0001) and endocardial side (P = .015). CONCLUSION: Bipolar ablation is more likely to create transmural and epicardial lesions in the ventricle wall. Half the time is needed for the creation of comparably deep and large lesions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020580
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211029091130.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jce.14407 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32083360
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Soucek, Filip $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St Anne's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Bipolar ablation with contact force-sensing of swine ventricles shows improved acute lesion features compared to sequential unipolar ablation / $c F. Soucek, G. Caluori, F. Lehar, J. Jez, M. Pesl, J. Wolf, A. Wojtaszczyk, S. Belaskova, Z. Starek
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Despite technical progress, ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after unipolar ablation remains relatively high (12%-47%). Bipolar ablation has been proposed as an appealing solution that may overcome limitations associated with unipolar ablation settings. We designed an animal study to compare bipolar (BPA) vs sequential unipolar ablation (UPA) using contact force-sensing technology on both ablation catheters. METHODS: Twenty large white female pigs (6-months-old, 50-60 kg) underwent multiple RF ablations (30 W, 60 seconds, 30 mL/min irrigation) on the ventricular myocardium from the epicardial and endocardial sides. The hearts were fixed and scanned with high-resolution cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Thermal lesions were located and characterized in volume, depth, width, and transmurality. RESULTS: Lesion volume was calculated as the sum of epicardial or endocardial conjoined/isolated lesions at one location. Linear dimensions (width and depth) were measured twice for each location, on the endocardial and epicardial side. We evaluated 35 lesions across the intraventricular septum (UPA, N = 17 vs BPA, N = 18). No difference in volume, linear dimensions or impedance drop was observed in this area between UPA and BPA. However, BPA required half RF time and showed an increased transmurality trend. We then analyzed 73 lesions from the endocardial side (UPA, N = 35 vs BPA, N = 38) and 50 from the epicardial side (UPA, N = 11 vs BPA N = 39) of the ventricular free walls. Lesion transmurality was markedly improved by BPA (P = .030, odds ratio, 23.73 [4.71,31.96]). Ventricular BPA lesions were significantly deeper on the epicardial side (P < .0001) and endocardial side (P = .015). CONCLUSION: Bipolar ablation is more likely to create transmural and epicardial lesions in the ventricle wall. Half the time is needed for the creation of comparably deep and large lesions.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a srdeční katétry $7 D062906
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D017115
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční komory $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D006352
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a myokard $x patologie $7 D009206
650    _2
$a Sus scrofa $7 D034421
650    12
$a měniče tlakové $7 D014160
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Caluori, Guido $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u Nanobiotechnology, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lehar, František $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St Anne's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $7 xx0104182
700    1_
$a Jez, Jiri $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St Anne's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pesl, Martin $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St Anne's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Wolf, Jiri $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St Anne's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Wojtaszczyk, Adam $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u 3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Belaskova, Silvie $u Biostatistics, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Starek, Zdenek $u Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Internal Medicine/Cardioangiology, St Anne's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002569 $t Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $x 1540-8167 $g Roč. 31, č. 5 (2020), s. 1128-1136
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32083360 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211029091139 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691204 $s 1141026
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 31 $c 5 $d 1128-1136 $e 20200302 $i 1540-8167 $m Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $n J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol $x MED00002569
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace