Metastasis-directed therapy and prostate-targeted therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, systematický přehled
PubMed
32550632
DOI
10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03779-0
PII: S0393-2249.20.03779-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cílená molekulární terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
- metastázy nádorů farmakoterapie MeSH
- nádory prostaty farmakoterapie patologie chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on the role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and/or prostate-targeted therapy (PTT) in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The following keywords were used: ("prostate cancer" OR "prostate carcinoma" OR "prostate neoplasm" OR "prostate tumor") AND ("oligometastatic" OR "oligometastasis" OR "PSMA") AND ("surgery" OR "prostatectomy" OR "radical prostatectomy" OR "cytoreductive" OR "local treatment" OR "radiotherapy" OR "stereotactic" OR "stereotaxic") AND ("survival" OR "mortality"). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: After evaluating the selection criteria, 81 studies were evaluated for our endpoints. We included 22 studies for PTT of synchronous mPCa. There have been no randomized studies on cytoreductive prostatectomy (cRP). Four prospective studies showed that cRP was feasible but did not contribute to a positive effect on overall survival (OS). Regarding PTT-radiotherapy, two randomized controlled phase 3 trials showed that OS was improved in men with a low metastatic burden. Regarding MDT of metachronous lymph node recurrence, we included 29 retrospective studies. For MDT of oligometastases, we included 30 studies. One randomized phase 2 trial showed that androgen deprivation therapy-free survival improved with stereotactic body radiation therapy compared to that with surveillance; however, benefits on OS remain unclear. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a comprehensive overview of the current literature on MDT and PTT. The feasibility of MDT and PTT is supported by several retrospective studies. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of high-quality trials to prove its survival benefits. Results from ongoing prospective trials data are awaited.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Campus Bio Medico University Rome Italy
Department of Urology Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine Ehime Japan
Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University Hospital of Tours Tours France
Department of Urology University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
EAU Young Urologist Office Arnhem the Netherlands
European Association of Urology Research Foundation Arnhem the Netherlands
European Society of Residents in Urology Arnhem the Netherlands
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org