The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176.

Cardiocenter 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Srobarova 50 Prague 100 34 Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Sakatani T, Sakamoto A, Kawamura K, Tanigaki T, Tsubakimoto Y, Isodono K, Kimura S, Matsuo A, Inoue K, Kitamura M, Fujita H.. Clinical outcome after permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with a high percentage of ventricular pacing. Int Heart J 2015;56:622–625. PubMed

Tse HF, Lau CP.. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:744–749. PubMed

Choudhary D, Chaurasia A, Kumar SM, Arulkumar A, Thajudeen A, Namboodiri N, Sanjay G, Abhilash SP, Ajitkumar VK, Ja T.. Radial left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking in apical versus non apical right ventricular pacing- evidence of dyssynchrony on medium term follow up. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2016;8:20–25. PubMed PMC

Zhang X-H, Chen HUA, Siu C-W, Yiu K-H, Chan W-S, Lee KL, Chan H-W, Lee SW, Fu G-S, Lau C-P, Tse H-F.. New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:136–141. PubMed

Lieberman R, Grenz D, Mond HG, Gammage MD.. Selective site pacing: defining and reaching the selected site. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:883–886. PubMed

Domenichini G, Sunthorn H, Fleury E, Foulkes H, Stettler C, Burri H.. Pacing of the interventricular septum versus the right ventricular apex: a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Intern Med 2012;23:621–627. PubMed

Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Amit G.. Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Europace 2012;14:81–91. PubMed

Cano O, Osca J, Sancho-Tello M-J, Sánchez JM, Ortiz V, Castro JE, Salvador A, Olagüe J.. Comparison of effectiveness of right ventricular septal pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1426–1432. PubMed

Mizukami A, Matsue Y, Naruse Y, Kowase S, Kurosaki K, Suzuki M, Matsumura A, Nogami A, Aonuma K, Hashimoto Y.. Implications of right ventricular septal pacing for medium-term prognosis: propensity-matched analysis. Int J Cardiol 2016;220:214–218. PubMed

Victor F, Mabo P, Mansour H, Pavin D, Kabalu G, Place CD, Leclercq C, Daubert JC.. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:238–242. PubMed

Osmancik P, Stros P, Herman D, Curila K, Petr R.. The insufficiency of left anterior oblique and the usefulness of right anterior oblique projection for correct localization of a computed tomography-verified right ventricular lead into the midseptum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:719–725. PubMed

Pang BJ, Joshi SB, Lui EH, Tacey MA, Ling L-H, Alison J, Seneviratne SK, Cameron JD, Mond HG.. Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014;37:495–504. PubMed

Ng AC, Allman C, Vidaic J, Tie H, Hopkins AP, Leung DY.. Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1096–1101. PubMed

McGavigan AD, Roberts-Thomson KC, Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, Mond HG.. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: radiographic and electrocardiographic correlates of lead position. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:1063–1068. PubMed

Burri H, Park C-I, Zimmermann M, Gentil-Baron P, Stettler C, Sunthorn H, Domenichini G, Shah D.. Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping. Europace 2011;13:82–86. PubMed

Mond HG, Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, McGavigan AD.. The right ventricular outflow tract: the road to septal pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:482–491. PubMed

P. O. Right Ventricular Apical Versus True Mid-septal Pacing (MS-R). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02412176. 2015. https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/record/NCT02412176?term=osmancik&rank=1 (accepted 9 April 2015).

Rowe MK, Moore P, Pratap J, Coucher J, Gould PA, Kaye GC.. Surface ECG and fluoroscopy are not predictive of right ventricular septal lead position compared to cardiac CT. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2017;40:537–544. PubMed

Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, Mond HG.. The right ventricular outflow tract: a comparative study of septal, anterior wall, and free wall pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:942–947. PubMed

Pastore G, Zanon F, Baracca E, Rigatelli G, Corbucci G, Mazza A, Noventa F, Roncon L.. How can we identify the optimal pacing site in the right ventricular septum? A simplified method applicable during the standard implantation procedure. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 2013;34:264–272. PubMed PMC

Burri H, Domenichini G, Sunthorn H, Ganière V, Stettler C.. Comparison of tools and techniques for implanting pacemaker leads on the ventricular mid-septum. Europace 2012;14:847–852. PubMed

See more in PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02412176