Peritoneal Dialysis Use and Practice Patterns: An International Survey Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32800844
DOI
10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.032
PII: S0272-6386(20)30891-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Epidemiology, RRT modality, access to health care, affordability of health care, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), global survey, health care delivery, health care disparities, health policy, home dialysis, international differences, kidney failure, peritoneal dialysis (PD), renal replacement therapy (RRT),
- MeSH
- chronické selhání ledvin terapie MeSH
- dostupnost zdravotnických služeb * MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče MeSH
- internacionalita * MeSH
- kvalita zdravotní péče MeSH
- lékaři MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náklady a analýza nákladů MeSH
- nefrologie MeSH
- nefrologové MeSH
- peritoneální dialýza * MeSH
- podíl na nákladech MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- rozvojové země MeSH
- správní úředníci MeSH
- výdaje na zdravotnictví MeSH
- vyspělé země MeSH
- zdravotní politika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Approximately 11% of people with kidney failure worldwide are treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study examined PD use and practice patterns across the globe. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders including clinicians, policy makers, and patient representatives in 182 countries convened by the International Society of Nephrology between July and September 2018. OUTCOMES: PD use, availability, accessibility, affordability, delivery, and reporting of quality outcome measures. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Responses were received from 88% (n=160) of countries and there were 313 participants (257 nephrologists [82%], 22 non-nephrologist physicians [7%], 6 other health professionals [2%], 17 administrators/policy makers/civil servants [5%], and 11 others [4%]). 85% (n=156) of countries responded to questions about PD. Median PD use was 38.1 per million population. PD was not available in 30 of the 156 (19%) countries responding to PD-related questions, particularly in countries in Africa (20/41) and low-income countries (15/22). In 69% of countries, PD was the initial dialysis modality for≤10% of patients with newly diagnosed kidney failure. Patients receiving PD were expected to pay 1% to 25% of treatment costs, and higher (>75%) copayments (out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients) were more common in South Asia and low-income countries. Average exchange volumes were adequate (defined as 3-4 exchanges per day or the equivalent for automated PD) in 72% of countries. PD quality outcome monitoring and reporting were variable. Most countries did not measure patient-reported PD outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Low responses from policy makers; limited ability to provide more in-depth explanations underpinning outcomes from each country due to lack of granular data; lack of objective data. CONCLUSIONS: Large inter- and intraregional disparities exist in PD availability, accessibility, affordability, delivery, and reporting of quality outcome measures around the world, with the greatest gaps observed in Africa and South Asia.
Department of Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong
Department of Nephrology General University Hospital Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Nephrology Kidney Foundation Hospital and Research Institute Dhaka Bangladesh
Department of Renal Medicine Singapore General Hospital Singapore
Dialysis Unit CASMU IAMPP Montevideo Uruguay
Division of Nephology and Hypertension Department of Medicine Saint Louis University Saint Louis MO
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension University of California Irvine Medical Center Orange CA
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa
Division of Nephrology Bezmialem Vakif University Istanbul Turkey
George Institute for Global Health UNSW New Delhi India
Nephrology Development Clinical Center Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia
Nephrology Division Department of Internal Medicine The Specialty Hospital Amman Jordan
Oxford Kidney Unit Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org