Natural course of pineal cysts-a radiographic study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
32922893
PubMed Central
PMC7398253
DOI
10.1186/s41016-018-0142-7
PII: 142
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Magnetic resonance imaging, Natural history, Neurosurgery, Pineal cyst,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Pineal cysts (PCs) are a benign lesion of the pineal gland that have been known to the medical community for a long time. With a prevalence rate of approximately 1% in the general population, PC is often a reason for medical counseling. The natural course of PC morphology has not been well described. In this study, we present a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of patients with PCs, with special focus on those who showed an increase or decrease in PC size. METHODS: We enrolled all patients with a PC who were referred to our department between January 2000 and January 2018. Each patient underwent a clinical examination, and the patient's age, sex, and presenting signs and symptoms were noted. MRI was performed during periodic examinations, and a clinical and radiological course was reassessed. RESULTS: In total, 133 patients (99 women, 34 men) were enrolled. The mean maximum diameter was 12.7 ± 5.2 mm (range 7-35 mm). PCs increased in size during the follow-up in seven patients (5.3%) and decreased in size in 10 (7.5%). The remaining cysts (n = 116, 87.2%) were stable over the follow-up period. Analyzing patients according to cyst size change, we found a significant difference in the mean age between the PC progression group and PC regression group (p = 0.01). The mean size of the PCs at the time of diagnosis did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.81). We diagnosed two cases of pineal apoplexy. CONCLUSION: We found that PCs are a dynamic structure that may change in size during the patient's lifetime. Patients with an increase in PC size were significantly younger than patients with a decrease in size. Therefore, PC growth in the first, second, and third decennium is normal and does not justify medical intervention. Surgery is indicated in cases of hydrocephalus and Parinaud's syndrome or in atypical cysts when neoplasia is suspected. The size of a PC does not predict PC behavior in terms of a future increase or decrease in size.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Virchow R. Die Krankhaften Geschwülste. Berlin: Verlag von August Hirschwald; 1865.
Campbell AW. Notes of two cases of dilatation of central cavity or ventricle of the pineal gland. Tr Path Soc. 1899;50:15–17.
Pussep L. Die operative Entfernung einer Zyste der Glandula pinealis. Neurol Zentralbl. 1914;33:560–563.
Bregant T, Rados M, Derganc M, Neubauer D, Kostovic I. Pineal cysts - a benign consequence of mild hypoxia in a near-term brain? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32:663–666. PubMed
Ozmen E, Derinkuyu B, Samanci C, Akmaz Unlu H, Hakan Demirkan T, Hasiloglu ZI, et al. The prevalence of pineal cyst in patients with cerebral palsy. Diagnostic Interv Radiol. 2015;21:262–266. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14329. PubMed DOI PMC
Koenigsberg RA, Faro S, Marino R, Turz A, Goldman W. Imaging of pineal apoplexy. Clin Imaging. 1996;20:91–94. doi: 10.1016/0899-7071(94)00079-4. PubMed DOI
McNeely PD, Howes WJ, Mehta V. Pineal apoplexy: is it a facilitator for the development of pineal cysts? Can J Neurol Sci. 2003;30:67–71. doi: 10.1017/S031716710000247X. PubMed DOI
Tapp E, Huxley M. The histological appearance of the human pineal gland from puberty to old age. J Pathol. 1972;108:137–144. doi: 10.1002/path.1711080207. PubMed DOI
Cooper ER. The human pineal gland and pineal cysts. J Anat. 1932;67:28–46. PubMed PMC
Al-Holou WN, Terman SW, Kilburg C, Garton HJL, Muraszko KM, Chandler WF, et al. Prevalence and natural history of pineal cysts in adults. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:1106–1114. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.JNS11506. PubMed DOI
Al-Holou WN, Maher CO, Muraszko KM, Garton HJL. The natural history of pineal cysts in children and young adults. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5:162–166. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.PEDS09297. PubMed DOI
Nevins Edward J., Das Kumar, Bhojak Maneesh, Pinto Rohan S., Hoque Mohammed N., Jenkinson Michael D., Chavredakis Emmanuel. Incidental Pineal Cysts: Is Surveillance Necessary? World Neurosurgery. 2016;90:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.092. PubMed DOI
Sawamura Y, Ikeda J, Ozawa M, Minoshima Y, Saito H, Abe H. Magnetic resonance images reveal a high incidence of asymptomatic pineal cysts in young women. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:11–5–6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199507000-00002. PubMed DOI
Berhouma M, Ni H, Delabar V, Tahhan N, Memou Salem S, Mottolese C, et al. Update on the management of pineal cysts: case series and a review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61:201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2013.08.010. PubMed DOI
Májovský M, Netuka D, Beneš V. Clinical management of pineal cysts: a worldwide online survey. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:663–669. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2726-3. PubMed DOI
Márquez J, Rivero M. Pineal cysts. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8:422. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.PEDS11161. PubMed DOI
Starke Robert M., Cappuzzo Justin M., Erickson Nicholas J., Sherman Jonathan H. Pineal cysts and other pineal region malignancies: determining factors predictive of hydrocephalus and malignancy. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;127(2):249–254. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16220. PubMed DOI
Barboriak DP, Lee L, Provenzale JM. Serial MR imaging of pineal cysts: implications for natural history and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:737–743. doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760737. PubMed DOI
Kang H-S, Kim DG, Han DH. Large glial cyst of the pineal gland: a possible growth mechanism. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:138–140. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0138. PubMed DOI
Klein P, Rubinstein LJ. Benign symptomatic glial cysts of the pineal gland: a report of seven cases and review of the literature. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:991–995. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.8.991. PubMed DOI PMC
Patel AJ, Fuller GN, Wildrick DM, Sawaya R. Pineal cyst apoplexy: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E1066. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000179990.46401.66. PubMed DOI
Richardson JK, Hirsch CS. Sudden, unexpected death due to “pineal apoplexy”. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1986;7:64–68. doi: 10.1097/00000433-198603000-00014. PubMed DOI