Association of preoperative serum De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32962909
DOI
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.013
PII: S1078-1439(20)30380-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CSS, Cytoreductive nephrectomy, De Ritis ratio, OS, mRCC,
- MeSH
- alanintransaminasa krev MeSH
- aspartátaminotransferasy krev MeSH
- cytoredukční chirurgie * MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk krev mortalita sekundární chirurgie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory ledvin krev mortalita patologie chirurgie MeSH
- nefrektomie metody MeSH
- předoperační období MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- alanintransaminasa MeSH
- aspartátaminotransferasy MeSH
PURPOSE: Identifying which patients are likely to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is important. We tested the association between preoperative serum De Ritis ratio (DRR, Aspartate Aminotransferase/Alanine Aminotransferase) and overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival (CSS) in mRCC patients treated with CN. MATERIAL AND METHODS: mRCC patients treated with CN at different institutions were included. After assessing for the optimal pretreatment DRR cut-off value, we found 1.2 to have the maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into 2 DRR groups using this cut-off (low, <1.2 vs. high, ≥1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the association between DRR and OS as well as CSS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index). The clinical value of the DRR was evaluated with decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Among 613 mRCC patients, 239 (39%) patients had a DRR ≥1.2. Median follow-up was 31 (IQR 16-58) months. On univariable analysis, high DRR was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.46, P = 0.04) and CSS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.47, P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, high DRR remained significantly associated with both OS (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04-1.52, P = 0.02) and CSS (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.53, P = 0.01). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.633 vs. C-index = 0.629). On decision curve analysis, the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit beyond that obtained by established subgroup analyses stratified by IMDC risk groups, type of systemic therapy, body mass index and sarcomatoid features, did not reveal any prognostic value to DRR. CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant association between DRR and OS as well as CSS in mRCC patients treated with CN, DRR does not seem to add any further prognostic value beyond that obtained by currently available features.
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org