European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel

. 2021 Apr ; 79 (4) : 480-488. [epub] 20210106

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33419683
Odkazy

PubMed 33419683
DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033
PII: S0302-2838(20)31019-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s. OBJECTIVE: To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004-2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary. PATIENT SUMMARY: The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule.

Department of Health Evidence Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands

Department of Pathology Caritas St Josef Medical Center University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Pathology Città della Salute e della Scienza University of Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy

Department of Pathology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

Department of Pathology Fundacio Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Pathology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain

Department of Pathology General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic

Department of Pathology Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain

Department of Pathology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Department of Pathology Pitié Salpétrière Hospital AP HP Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School Sorbonne University Paris France

Department of Pathology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands

Department of Pathology Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Royal Free Hospital London UK

Department of Pathology Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic

Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Surgical Oncology University Health Network Princess Margaret Cancer Center University of Toronto Toronto Canada

Department of Urology Amsterdam University Medical Center Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology Amsterdam University Medical Center Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology Caritas St Josef Medical Center University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Urology Città della Salute e della Scienza University of Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Fundacio Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Fundacio Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain; Department of Urology Città della Salute e della Scienza University of Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy

Department of Urology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain

Department of Urology General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain

Department of Urology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Department of Urology Pitié Salpétrière Hospital AP HP Sorbonne University Paris France

Department of Urology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands

Department of Urology Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Royal Free Hospital London UK

Department of Urology Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Tenon Hospital AP HP Sorbonne University Paris France

Department of Urology The Stokes Centre for Urology Royal Surrey Hospital Guildford UK

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Arnhem The Netherlands

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Pathology Tenon Hospital AP HP Sorbonne University Paris France

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology University Health Network Princess Margaret Cancer Center University of Toronto Toronto Canada

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Caritas St Josef Medical Center University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Città della Salute e della Scienza University of Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Fundacio Puigvert Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia Spain

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Pitié Salpétrière Hospital AP HP Sorbonne University Paris France

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Royal Free Hospital London UK

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Praha Prague Czech Republic; Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

European Association of Urology Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Arnhem The Netherlands; Department of Urology The Stokes Centre for Urology Royal Surrey Hospital Guildford UK

Laboratory Medicine Program University Health Network Princess Margaret Cancer Center University of Toronto Toronto Canada

Komentář v

PubMed

Erratum v

PubMed

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...