Safety assessment of a novel thermostable phytase
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33437655
PubMed Central
PMC7787994
DOI
10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.12.015
PII: S2214-7500(20)30460-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 2AA, 2-aminoanthracene, 6-phytase, 9AA, 9-aminoacridine, AAFCO, Association of American Feed Control Officials, ANOVA, analysis of variance, DMSO, Dimethyl sulfoxide, GLP, Good Laboratory Practice, Genotoxicity, IACUC, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, MMS, methylmethanesulfonate, MPCE, polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei, NOAEL, no observed adverse effect level, NPD, 4-nitro-12-phenylenediamine, OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation, OptiPhos PLUS, PCE, polychromatic erythrocyte, Phytase TSP, SAZ, sodium azide, Subchronic toxicity, Thermostable phytase, Toxicity, bw, body weight,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
A novel 6-phytase (Phytase TSP, trade name OptiPhos® PLUS) with improved thermostability has been developed for use in animal feed. The safety of the new phytase was evaluated by testing for genotoxicity and subchronic toxicity. In in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays Phytase TSP concentrate was not mutagenic and did not induce biologically or statistically significant increases in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes. In a subchronic toxicity study, male and female rats administered 100, 500 or 1000 mg/kg body weight/day of Phytase TSP concentrate via oral gavage for 90 days had no mortalities, and no treatment-related effects on body weight, food consumption, clinical observations or ophthalmology. Furthermore, there were no changes in haematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, gross pathology, organ weights or histopathology that could be attributed to the test article. Several endpoints exhibited statistically significant effects, but none was dose-related or considered to be of toxicological relevance. Based on these results, Phytase TSP concentrate (OptiPhos® PLUS) was not genotoxic and the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for male and female rats was 1000 mg/kg body weight/day.
Huvepharma EOOD 39 Petar Rakov Street 4550 Peshtera Bulgaria
Huvepharma N 5 Uitbreidingstraat 80 2600 Antwerp Belgium
Leveret GmbH Aberenrain 30 6340 Baar Switzerland
MediTox s r o Pod Zamkem 279 281 25 Konarovice Czech Republic
Toxi COOP Toxicological Research Center ZRT Balatonfüred Arácsi út 97 8230 Hungary
Zobrazit více v PubMed
R. Greiner, U. Konietzny, Phytases: biochemistry, enzymology and characteristics relevant to animal feed use, Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition, pp. 96–128.
Greiner R., Konietzny U. Phytase for food application. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2006;44:125–140.
Vats P., Banerjee U.C. Production studies and catalytic properties of phytases (myo-inositolhexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): an overview. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2004;35:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.03.010. DOI
Casey A., Walsh G. Identification and characterization of a phytase of potential commercial interest. J. Biotechnol. 2004;110:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.03.001. PubMed DOI
Rodriguez E., Han Y., Lei X.G. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of an Escherichia coli acid phosphatase/phytase gene (appA2) isolated from pig colon. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;257:117–123. PubMed
Rodriguez E., Wood Z.A., Karplus P.A., Lei X.G. Site-directed mutagenesis improves catalytic efficiency and thermostability of Escherichia coli pH 2.5 acid phosphatase/phytase expressed in Pichia pastoris. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000;382:105–112. PubMed
Dassa J., Marck C., Boquet P.L. The complete nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli gene appA reveals significant homology between pH 2.5 acid phosphatase and glucose-1-phosphatase. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:5497–5500. PubMed PMC
Jigami Y. Yeast glycobiology and its application. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008;72:637–648. PubMed
Dersjant-Li Y., Awati A., Schulze H., Partridge G. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: a critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015;95:878–896. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6998. PubMed DOI PMC
Ladics G.S., Han K.-H., Jang M.S., Park H., Marshall V., Dersjant-Li Y., Sewalt V.J. Safety evaluation of a novel variant of consensus bacterial phytase. Toxicol. Rep. 2020;7:844–851. PubMed PMC
Ciofalo V., Barton N., Kretz K., Baird J., Cook M., Shanahan D. Safety evaluation of a phytase, expressed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, intended for use in animal feed. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003;37:286–292. PubMed
Zyla K. Phytase applications in poultry feeding: selected issues. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2001;10:247–258.
Sewalt V., Shanahan D., Gregg L., La Marta J., Carrillo R. The generally recognized as Safe (GRAS) process for industrial microbial enzymes. Ind. Biotechnol. 2016;12:295–302.
Kozlowski K., Nollet L., Lanckriet A., Vanderbeke E., Mielnik P., Outchkourov N., Petkov S. Effect of different phytases derived from E. coli AppA gene on the performance, bone mineralisation and nutrient digestibility of broiler chicken. J. Appl. Anim. Nutr. 2019;7:1–9.
Wiśniewska Z., Nollet L., Lanckriet A., Vanderbeke E., Petkov S., Outchkourov N., Kasprowicz-Potocka M., Zaworska-Zakrzewska A., Kaczmarek S.A. Effect of phytase derived from the E. coli AppA gene on weaned piglet performance, apparent total tract digestibility and bone mineralization. Animals. 2020;10:121. PubMed PMC
Pariza M.W., Foster E.M. Determining the safety of enzymes used in food processing. J. Food Prot. 1983;46:453–468. PubMed
Aureli R., Faruk M.U., Cechova I., Pedersen P.B., Elvig-Joergensen S.G., Fru F., Broz J. The efficacy of a novel microbial 6-phytase expressed in Aspergillus oryzae on the performance and phosphorus utilization in broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2011;10:160–168.
Lichtenberg J., Pedersen P.B., Elvig-Joergensen S.G., Skov L.K., Olsen C.L., Glitsoe L.V. Toxicological studies on a novel phytase expressed from synthetic genes in Aspergillus oryzae. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2011;60:401–410. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.05.010. PubMed DOI